I was extremely pleased to read that the Daily Journal has endorsed Charles Stone for San Mateo County supervisor concluding: “Stone is a natural for District 2 supervisor. He is progressive, but practical. His experience, knowledge, communication skills, and impressive drive for constituent service simply make him the best choice.”
Charles Stone’s breadth of experience, knowledge of our county government, policy chops, and legislative track record, coupled with his empathy and robust engagement with constituents and stakeholders is unmatched.
Our communities of San Mateo, Foster City and Belmont will be well served by Charles Stone as we have been through his work as a member of both the Caltrain and SamTrans boards, as well as his work to establish the three-city fire agency now serving our communities. His years of success in Belmont and countywide are a testament to both his political skill and passion for service.
I look forward to voting for Charles Stone for supervisor and I encourage my neighbors to do the same.
As residents of Belmont know, Stone has almost no empathy or engagement with the 50% of residents who disagree with him. He usually shuts them out completely and refuses to discuss the merits of the issues they raise. When he does respond, it is usually in a condescending and dismissive manner. He doesn't have the temperament to be an effective public servant and should be defeated in November.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
As residents of Belmont know, Stone has almost no empathy or engagement with the 50% of residents who disagree with him. He usually shuts them out completely and refuses to discuss the merits of the issues they raise. When he does respond, it is usually in a condescending and dismissive manner. He doesn't have the temperament to be an effective public servant and should be defeated in November.
Similar to your most recent hit piece - you have issues with men that are compassionate, empathetic, articulate, enthusiastic and competent.
Now that it’s down to Stone or Corzo, the option for anyone who cares about fairness and justice is clear. Stone is the obvious choice.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.