Is Taiwan already lost to China, with upcoming worldwide semiconductor supply chain and grave international economic consequences? From what we are learning from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the answer is a resounding yes. Businesses and the world community better get ready.
It is without doubt that Chinese President Xi intends to absorb Taiwan during his reign. Lessons from Ukraine are not easy to apply given clear differences. But two things are apparent: Taiwan is the most important semiconductor player in the world and Chinese control, or destruction of that capacity would have worldwide crippling impacts on supply chains and our day-to-day economy. International sanctions against China would likely have far more consequences to the world community than those imposed on Russia.
Ukraine, a struggling democracy, is recognized worldwide and previously by Russia as a sovereign nation. Taiwan, a vibrant democracy, is considered by China, the United States, and most nations a part of China, not a sovereign nation.
The United States does not have a defense treaty with Ukraine but supports it because it is a democracy and sovereign nation. It is also concerned about spillover to NATO allies bordering Ukraine, who it is obligated to militarily defend. The United States does not have a treaty obligation to militarily defend Taiwan, an island with no one on its borders. The United States, however, is obligated to support it until such time as the Taiwanese desire to peacefully unite with China.
The Ukrainian people have demonstrated a hard-core willingness to fight to the death while suffering a humanitarian crisis, but the jury is out as to the willingness, much less the ability of the Taiwanese to do the same.
The international community has come to the aid of Ukraine but its warnings to Putin neither detered him, nor have the sanctions caused him to stop the devastation. What will happen with Taiwan?
The U.S. administration has made clear it will not directly militarily engage Russia over Ukraine to avoid a potential World War III. Without direct military intervention by the United States and its allies, Taiwan cannot deny a Chinese invasion. Despite the U.S. official position of “strategic ambiguity” as to whether it will militarily fight China to prevent a successful invasion, the lesson President Xi will likely draw is that the United States will not do so.
Recommended for you
In military circles, there are debates about whether an invasion of Taiwan can be prevented through either the appearance of demonstrated capability to impose unacceptable military costs to the Chinese or by using that capability in the event of an invasion, as compared to merely punishing China after the fact. One lesson from Ukraine is that if an invasion is not prevented, devastation may follow.
If there is a fight, the Taiwanese and the United States would bear the brunt of actual fighting if it chose to militarily engage. Many U.S. military leaders believe neither Taiwan nor the United States currently has the military capability to “deny” an invasion, even assuming the United States would try.
While the Chinese military has been built up for years aimed at a successful invasion, and Chinese military leaders believe it can be accomplished at “an acceptable cost,” the timeline is unclear. But seasoned observers think it is anywhere from a few years from now to a decade.
Putin, long ago, made clear his intentions but the international community did not make the geopolitical, military and economic decisions to “deny” or mitigate the consequences. President Xi has made clear China’s destiny is to absorb Taiwan during his reign. What decisions will we make?
Time is short for Taiwan. For any possibility to successfully deter an invasion, the United States, Taiwan and its allies must come to consensus on a fighting strategy and the defense budgets must focus on the practical, readily available, useful weapons and training.
Though sanctions would undoubtedly hurt China, so too the rest of the world. Sanctions imposed after the fact will not work.
U.S. business and the international community better get prepared for the “loss” of Taiwan and the consequences to follow.
Jim Hartnett is an attorney, consultant, former member of Naval Security Group, certificate holder from Harvard Kennedy School on programs in national and international security, and cybersecurity. He is the former general manager and CEO of the San Mateo County Transit District.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Hartnett. When treasonous Biden took a knee and gave Afghanistan, along with aid and comfort, to the Taliban, it was a green light for any other country having designs on expanding their influence. They all know they can take Biden behind the woodshed - Russia already has and it remains to be seen whether China will. If China does, it won’t be a great surprise. Sadly, we’ll be treated to more hot air and impotence from bumbling Biden and the mainstream media either apologizing, or ignoring Biden’s ineffectiveness in global affairs.
Yes Jim, elections have consequences. Xi's CCP would not have dared even touching Taiwan if Trump had been reelected. The weakness of the Biden Administration is also a major reason Putin invaded the Ukraine. And remember that our worst enemies are White Supremacists and parents who question school board decisions. Let's call a spade a spade. Three more years of misery and despair.
You may be right. If Trump were in office China wouldn't worry about Taiwan because dictator wannabe, DJT, would be more valuable to them by his loose lips and the secrets given to them. Just like Russia had no need for Ukraine until Donald, Vlad's BFF, was out of office. Why buy the cow when the milk is free? I probably will not live long enough and you may not either, but history will show the the real treasonous Trump and his family of grifters.
Taffy - come again? Who gave secrets to the CCP? Wasn't it Clinton who gave away our missile target technology. Wasn't it Trump who tried to stop the Chinese students and scientists in this country to spy and transfer our knowledge capital? Who placed the CCP in the WTO? Come on, Trump was the first one to stand up to the CCP and you dare to call him a dictator wannabe? How so, because he was trying to secure the border? Do you feel safer now than 3 years ago? How about your grocery bill? But, if you can even produce one iota of proof that Trump had designs on becoming a dictator I am waiting with baited breath.
Sorry, I guess you can't see the forest for the trees. If you couldn't see it in Trump's words and actions over the past five years I won't be able to explain it to you in these comments.
Good job Dirk, calling Taffy’s bluff. It would likely take Taffy over five years to fashion a factual response to explain his balderdash accusations regarding our great President Trump. Meanwhile, in a minute, we can easily list bumbling Biden’s failures. Something Taffy could do if he started living in the present.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(8) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Hartnett. When treasonous Biden took a knee and gave Afghanistan, along with aid and comfort, to the Taliban, it was a green light for any other country having designs on expanding their influence. They all know they can take Biden behind the woodshed - Russia already has and it remains to be seen whether China will. If China does, it won’t be a great surprise. Sadly, we’ll be treated to more hot air and impotence from bumbling Biden and the mainstream media either apologizing, or ignoring Biden’s ineffectiveness in global affairs.
Yes Jim, elections have consequences. Xi's CCP would not have dared even touching Taiwan if Trump had been reelected. The weakness of the Biden Administration is also a major reason Putin invaded the Ukraine. And remember that our worst enemies are White Supremacists and parents who question school board decisions. Let's call a spade a spade. Three more years of misery and despair.
Dirk,
You may be right. If Trump were in office China wouldn't worry about Taiwan because dictator wannabe, DJT, would be more valuable to them by his loose lips and the secrets given to them. Just like Russia had no need for Ukraine until Donald, Vlad's BFF, was out of office. Why buy the cow when the milk is free? I probably will not live long enough and you may not either, but history will show the the real treasonous Trump and his family of grifters.
Hunter Biden? James Biden?
Taf, Yep!
Taffy - come again? Who gave secrets to the CCP? Wasn't it Clinton who gave away our missile target technology. Wasn't it Trump who tried to stop the Chinese students and scientists in this country to spy and transfer our knowledge capital? Who placed the CCP in the WTO? Come on, Trump was the first one to stand up to the CCP and you dare to call him a dictator wannabe? How so, because he was trying to secure the border? Do you feel safer now than 3 years ago? How about your grocery bill? But, if you can even produce one iota of proof that Trump had designs on becoming a dictator I am waiting with baited breath.
Dirk,
Sorry, I guess you can't see the forest for the trees. If you couldn't see it in Trump's words and actions over the past five years I won't be able to explain it to you in these comments.
Good job Dirk, calling Taffy’s bluff. It would likely take Taffy over five years to fashion a factual response to explain his balderdash accusations regarding our great President Trump. Meanwhile, in a minute, we can easily list bumbling Biden’s failures. Something Taffy could do if he started living in the present.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.