Nanci Nishimura

Nanci Nishimura

Like any developed society, we must never forget that wrongs occurred, learn from the past and not allow history to repeat itself. On our Peninsula, one example was the forced removal of Americans of Japanese descent to Tanforan Racetrack in San Bruno following Japan’s brutal attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, followed by their transfer to prison camps during World War II. Now 80 years later, we must remember what happened.

On Feb. 19, 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which authorized the wholesale relocation of approximately 120,000 people to 10 prison camps hastily constructed in remote and inhospitable locations to prevent these citizens or their family members from allegedly aiding Imperial Japan.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(7) comments

willallen

Interesting about the Italians. News to a lot of people. As for "German" submarines, they were sinking anything that moved off the East coast. Out here it was the Japanese subs that were sinking ships. Informative piece. Well done. However, wish she had mentioned the 442nd made up of Japanese Americans. Overall a sad chapter that makes us live up to our ideals - I hope. Seems today, however, some people use history as a weapon rather than learning from it.

Dirk van Ulden

Thank you Ms. Nishimura for your excellent description of what happened to the Japanese community in California. My former American-Japanese neighbor, now deceased, told me much about his experience and how he also enlisted to get out of the camp. He was the only one in his direct family who could own anything such a car or a house. He was eventually assigned to General MacArthur's staff, also as an interpreter after he had been sent to Japanese language school at UC Davis. Apparently, his English was much better than his Japanese language skills. You undermined your otherwise excellent article by stating that slavery in the Colonies started in 1619. This is a myth perpetrated by revisionists. As a clearly educated person you ought to be careful before you make such pronouncements. The 1619 myth is another example of what we have been trying to overcome, unsolicited racism, which is ironically now endorsed by you.

Mr. van Ulden - it is a clearly, well documented fact that African slaves were brought to Jamestown Colony in 1619. However, there is some documentation that the first African slaves brought to what would later become the United States arrived in 1526. Either way, stating the facts of our history, as Ms. Nishimura so eloquently did in her piece, is not "unsolicited racism". The racism here is trying to erase the ugly portions of American history because it makes you uncomfortable. I am thankful that Ms. Nishimura endorses the truth.

Dirk van Ulden

Dear Reverend - I am not uncomfortable because I know a farce when I see it. The 1619 Project asserts that the US was founded with slavery in mind. You should know that this is completely bogus but it seems to make you comfortable. So, please keep on dwelling on nonsense and misinform those around you.

Tafhdyd

Dirk,

I re-read the LTE from Ms. Nishimura and she does not mention the "1619 Project". She states that the first slaves brought to the colonies were brought in 1619. That information is widely available through several respected historical sources. Rev. Owens comment that some slaves were in what is now the United States as early as 1526 is also correct. She also does not mention the "1619 Project".

The 20 odd slaves brought to Virginia were captured by an English privateer operating under Dutch authority. They were captured from a Portuguese slave trading ship that was transporting them to Mexico. One of the 1619 Project authors states that "protecting the institution of slavery was a primary motive for the American Revolution" which is the item that has generated the controversy about the Project, not the fact that slaves were brought here before the Mayflower in 1619.

Terence Y

Mr. van Ulden - it’s amazing that the debunked 1619 Project is still being referenced, and even the year 1619, especially since 1619 is well before our Declaration of Independence and the beginning of our American history.

Tommy Tee

Yes--it is well documented, and Ms. Nishimura was eloquent in her piece. Alas, we still have people among us who push historical revisionism.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here