Like any developed society, we must never forget that wrongs occurred, learn from the past and not allow history to repeat itself. On our Peninsula, one example was the forced removal of Americans of Japanese descent to Tanforan Racetrack in San Bruno following Japan’s brutal attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, followed by their transfer to prison camps during World War II. Now 80 years later, we must remember what happened.
On Feb. 19, 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which authorized the wholesale relocation of approximately 120,000 people to 10 prison camps hastily constructed in remote and inhospitable locations to prevent these citizens or their family members from allegedly aiding Imperial Japan.
One day they were well-regarded members of American society, but with a swirl of the president’s pen, they became “alien enemies.” Virtually overnight, children were expelled from school, adults were fired from their jobs, and they were forced to sell or abandon their businesses at great loss. These were Americans of Japanese descent — who lost their property, their rights and their freedom — they took what they could carry to one of 15 “assembly centers” — converted horse stalls at race tracks — until they could be transported to a prison camp under armed guards. Tanforan Racetrack was one of 12 California assembly centers that housed more than 7,000 Bay Area Americans of Japanese descent for more than seven months before they were shipped to prison camp — called “War Relocation Centers” or “internment camps.”
In Los Angeles, the largest assembly center was at Santa Anita Racetrack, which, at its peak, housed nearly 19,000 Americans of Japanese descent. My entire family, including both sets of grandparents and my parents, Tokiko and Minoru, who were children at the time, were forced to leave their homes in Hollywood, relocate to the race track, and later endure a lengthy train ride with covered windows to the desolation of Heart Mountain, Wyoming, where they were held for several years.
After the war, my father joined the U.S. Army, including others from the camps, where they served with distinction and honor. My father was deployed to occupied Japan where he worked as an interpreter. In the 1980s, the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C., held an exhibition on the “internment camps.” Upon seeing a “replica” of their housing barracks with frilly window curtains and furniture — my mother burst into tears — there were no curtains in the horse stalls and the “replica” failed to reproduce the stench of horse manure.
Recommended for you
While Americans of Japanese descent were imprisoned, other “alien enemies” included Italian citizens were merely watched. For example, in 1941, Leo Giorgetti came home to the coast in Half Moon Bay on leave from the Pacific where he was proudly serving in the U.S. Navy, only to discover that his mother, an Italian citizen, was forced to leave their coastside farm at sundown to sleep 1 mile inland because the government feared that Italian citizens might aid German U-Boats off the coast with signal lights!
The imprisonment of Americans of Japanese descent during World War II is one of the most disgraceful events in our history and was never taught in schools. What happened must be acknowledged and included in our educational curriculum. The same is true with remembering and teaching the history of African enslavement that began in 1619, before the Mayflower arrived from Europe in Plymouth, Massachusetts, in 1620. And we must not forget the wholesale genocide and indoctrination of Native Americans throughout history and into the 20th century. Future generations must be allowed learn, encouraged to think critically, and grow with empathy and humanity. It is the only way the sins of history will not repeat itself.
Sadly, violent attacks on Asians in the Bay Area and nationwide are increasing and we must speak up and act on this problem. History cannot be allowed to condone the resurgence of enactments like the Chinese Exclusion laws and the National Origins quota systems. We must act together to stop attacks on citizens because of their race, religion, gender or color of their skin. We are all immigrants or the children of immigrants in our country.
Only through acknowledgement of America’s ignoble history can we become the country our constitution intended. Words are not enough — it is only through direct and swift action by us all together can we be the country we claim to be. Violence and repressive conduct against any of our citizens, including immigrants, must be stopped. Otherwise, we cannot survive as a democratic society. We do not need another executive order like 9066. We are, after all, the United States of America.
Nanci E. Nishimura is co-chair of the Leaders Forum, from the White House Initiative on Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders. She is also a trial attorney and partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy.
Interesting about the Italians. News to a lot of people. As for "German" submarines, they were sinking anything that moved off the East coast. Out here it was the Japanese subs that were sinking ships. Informative piece. Well done. However, wish she had mentioned the 442nd made up of Japanese Americans. Overall a sad chapter that makes us live up to our ideals - I hope. Seems today, however, some people use history as a weapon rather than learning from it.
Thank you Ms. Nishimura for your excellent description of what happened to the Japanese community in California. My former American-Japanese neighbor, now deceased, told me much about his experience and how he also enlisted to get out of the camp. He was the only one in his direct family who could own anything such a car or a house. He was eventually assigned to General MacArthur's staff, also as an interpreter after he had been sent to Japanese language school at UC Davis. Apparently, his English was much better than his Japanese language skills. You undermined your otherwise excellent article by stating that slavery in the Colonies started in 1619. This is a myth perpetrated by revisionists. As a clearly educated person you ought to be careful before you make such pronouncements. The 1619 myth is another example of what we have been trying to overcome, unsolicited racism, which is ironically now endorsed by you.
Mr. van Ulden - it is a clearly, well documented fact that African slaves were brought to Jamestown Colony in 1619. However, there is some documentation that the first African slaves brought to what would later become the United States arrived in 1526. Either way, stating the facts of our history, as Ms. Nishimura so eloquently did in her piece, is not "unsolicited racism". The racism here is trying to erase the ugly portions of American history because it makes you uncomfortable. I am thankful that Ms. Nishimura endorses the truth.
Dear Reverend - I am not uncomfortable because I know a farce when I see it. The 1619 Project asserts that the US was founded with slavery in mind. You should know that this is completely bogus but it seems to make you comfortable. So, please keep on dwelling on nonsense and misinform those around you.
I re-read the LTE from Ms. Nishimura and she does not mention the "1619 Project". She states that the first slaves brought to the colonies were brought in 1619. That information is widely available through several respected historical sources. Rev. Owens comment that some slaves were in what is now the United States as early as 1526 is also correct. She also does not mention the "1619 Project".
The 20 odd slaves brought to Virginia were captured by an English privateer operating under Dutch authority. They were captured from a Portuguese slave trading ship that was transporting them to Mexico. One of the 1619 Project authors states that "protecting the institution of slavery was a primary motive for the American Revolution" which is the item that has generated the controversy about the Project, not the fact that slaves were brought here before the Mayflower in 1619.
Mr. van Ulden - it’s amazing that the debunked 1619 Project is still being referenced, and even the year 1619, especially since 1619 is well before our Declaration of Independence and the beginning of our American history.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(7) comments
Interesting about the Italians. News to a lot of people. As for "German" submarines, they were sinking anything that moved off the East coast. Out here it was the Japanese subs that were sinking ships. Informative piece. Well done. However, wish she had mentioned the 442nd made up of Japanese Americans. Overall a sad chapter that makes us live up to our ideals - I hope. Seems today, however, some people use history as a weapon rather than learning from it.
Thank you Ms. Nishimura for your excellent description of what happened to the Japanese community in California. My former American-Japanese neighbor, now deceased, told me much about his experience and how he also enlisted to get out of the camp. He was the only one in his direct family who could own anything such a car or a house. He was eventually assigned to General MacArthur's staff, also as an interpreter after he had been sent to Japanese language school at UC Davis. Apparently, his English was much better than his Japanese language skills. You undermined your otherwise excellent article by stating that slavery in the Colonies started in 1619. This is a myth perpetrated by revisionists. As a clearly educated person you ought to be careful before you make such pronouncements. The 1619 myth is another example of what we have been trying to overcome, unsolicited racism, which is ironically now endorsed by you.
Mr. van Ulden - it is a clearly, well documented fact that African slaves were brought to Jamestown Colony in 1619. However, there is some documentation that the first African slaves brought to what would later become the United States arrived in 1526. Either way, stating the facts of our history, as Ms. Nishimura so eloquently did in her piece, is not "unsolicited racism". The racism here is trying to erase the ugly portions of American history because it makes you uncomfortable. I am thankful that Ms. Nishimura endorses the truth.
Dear Reverend - I am not uncomfortable because I know a farce when I see it. The 1619 Project asserts that the US was founded with slavery in mind. You should know that this is completely bogus but it seems to make you comfortable. So, please keep on dwelling on nonsense and misinform those around you.
Dirk,
I re-read the LTE from Ms. Nishimura and she does not mention the "1619 Project". She states that the first slaves brought to the colonies were brought in 1619. That information is widely available through several respected historical sources. Rev. Owens comment that some slaves were in what is now the United States as early as 1526 is also correct. She also does not mention the "1619 Project".
The 20 odd slaves brought to Virginia were captured by an English privateer operating under Dutch authority. They were captured from a Portuguese slave trading ship that was transporting them to Mexico. One of the 1619 Project authors states that "protecting the institution of slavery was a primary motive for the American Revolution" which is the item that has generated the controversy about the Project, not the fact that slaves were brought here before the Mayflower in 1619.
Mr. van Ulden - it’s amazing that the debunked 1619 Project is still being referenced, and even the year 1619, especially since 1619 is well before our Declaration of Independence and the beginning of our American history.
Yes--it is well documented, and Ms. Nishimura was eloquent in her piece. Alas, we still have people among us who push historical revisionism.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.