With the rescinding of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the president has effectively struck terror in the hearts of millions of individuals living in the United States. For the thousands already terrorized here in San Mateo County by their intimate partners, he has effectively blessed further abuse and intimidation. For many, it could amount to a death knell.
Survivors of domestic violence face numerous and often daunting barriers to leaving their abusive relationships. Many abusers threaten to and some do kill their partners when they try to leave. In fact, nearly every domestic violence-related homicide in San Mateo County over the past decade has occurred during or immediately following a period of separation.
Secondly, immigrant survivors and their children already often face threats of deportation from their partners if they try to leave. In fact, under the current administration, immigration arrests have increased 38 percent with more than half a million people in detention centers awaiting immigration hearings. These arrests and deportations rip families and communities apart, and Trump continues to use inflammatory, anti-immigrant rhetoric that is being repeated across the country. The president’s recent decision encourages further abuse and exploitation. Without congressional action to enact legislation in a timely manner, DACA recipients will be forced to live their lives in constant fear that they will be deported at any moment and separated from their families and communities.
Access to work authorization, driver’s licenses and education — opportunities available through DACA — increase a survivor’s economic independence. In one survey, three quarters of women in abusive relationships reported staying with their partner for economic reasons. A driver’s license provides a means of access to jobs, vocational programs and other educational opportunities, and decreases the ability of abusers to control and exploit immigrant survivors. Work authorization increases immigrant survivors’ economic security, helps survivors support their families and helps grow and support the economy of our nation.
Since its inception in 2012, DACA has provided nearly 800,000 young people in the United States the opportunity to pursue an education, obtain work authorization, start small businesses, serve in the military and make significant contributions to their communities. To be granted DACA, these young people passed extensive background checks and were required to be enrolled in school, graduate from high school or serve in the armed forces for our country.
Recommended for you
The Violence Against Women Act, conceived by recent Vice President Joe Biden, has prevented abuse and exploitation, promoted public trust and made communities safer. DACA and other forms of immigration relief are critical to protecting our communities and helping survivors feel secure so that they can rebuild their lives and be economically self-sufficient. Furthermore, immigrant survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault often fear accessing help. Safeguarding DACA and other immigration relief will protect individuals from deportation and allow survivors and witnesses of crimes like domestic violence, sexual assault and human trafficking feel safe to report crimes to police without fear that seeking justice will put them at risk of being deported.
An estimated 685,000 DACA recipients are legally employed in and contributing to the U.S. economy. If DACA is allowed to lapse and Congress fails to authorize immigration reform that provides these undocumented immigrants a path to legal status, hundreds of thousands of individuals will be at greater risk of exploitation and abuse at work, local economies will suffer and our nation will lose billions in GDP over the next decade. Low wages and wage theft, as well as unsafe working conditions — including sexual harassment and violence and human trafficking — are rife in many low-wage industries that employ high numbers of undocumented immigrants.
Denying legal status and a permanent pathway to citizenship for the hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants who came here as children with their families, and who call the United States home, is not only irresponsible, it is dangerous. Without it, the president could well have blood on his hands as the existing barriers to leaving their relationships become even more daunting.
Where is the logic in this inhumane decision, one that will perpetuate and worsen the toll on families and communities already struggling. Congress should act swiftly to pass a standalone DREAM Act.
Melissa Lukin is the executive director of CORA, Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse, based in San Mateo.
We need as many illegal aliens as possible to fill the pews of churches, keep the liberal agenda in place at the voting polls, and promote the need for higher taxes. What is wrong with that?
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore, Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I life my lamp beside the golden door!" Should we remove it or just write Void across it? Dragon slayer. Like they really existed.
We should remove it or write VOID across it if the immigrant in question is trying to sneak into our country illegally. However, if they play by our laws and enter our country legally, we want to welcome them with open arms. I hope that clarifies things JD.
If illegals are not in this country to begin with, our society would not have to worry about whether they got themselves into a violent domestic situation. See how that works? This is the same logic used by advocates for sanctuary cities. The argument goes that if illegals don't have sanctuary, they will not work with police. How about, if we didn't have illegal immigration, the crime would not have been committed in our country in the first place.
800,000 Daca's at a taxpayer cost of $400 billion over the years. Almost half a $trillion. We have to get a handle on immigration and have "legal" come in. The average of DACAs is 25 years of age. These people are not all "kids," as many politicians and advocates say they are.
[thumbup] All true, but the illegal alien industrial complex will push the narrative that the illegals are victims of the US govt, which is absolute nonsense.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(8) comments
We need as many illegal aliens as possible to fill the pews of churches, keep the liberal agenda in place at the voting polls, and promote the need for higher taxes. What is wrong with that?
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore, Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I life my lamp beside the golden door!" Should we remove it or just write Void across it? Dragon slayer. Like they really existed.
The "Give me your Poor.." is poetry, not policy.
We should remove it or write VOID across it if the immigrant in question is trying to sneak into our country illegally. However, if they play by our laws and enter our country legally, we want to welcome them with open arms. I hope that clarifies things JD.
If illegals are not in this country to begin with, our society would not have to worry about whether they got themselves into a violent domestic situation. See how that works? This is the same logic used by advocates for sanctuary cities. The argument goes that if illegals don't have sanctuary, they will not work with police. How about, if we didn't have illegal immigration, the crime would not have been committed in our country in the first place.
800,000 Daca's at a taxpayer cost of $400 billion over the years. Almost half a $trillion. We have to get a handle on immigration and have "legal" come in. The average of DACAs is 25 years of age. These people are not all "kids," as many politicians and advocates say they are.
The "Do it for the kids" message is pure propaganda. It's designed for the sympathy vote.
[thumbup] All true, but the illegal alien industrial complex will push the narrative that the illegals are victims of the US govt, which is absolute nonsense.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.