On a cold 1979 morning at Lackland Air Force Base San Antonio, each Airman Basic stood trembling by his locker as our TI (Training Instructor) went from person to person doing the classic first interrogation followed by insults. My parents had warned me that I might encounter antisemitism and it was at the back of my mind as the sergeant approached me. “WIESNER!” He boomed. “Is that a JEWISH name?” Staring straight ahead I responded “Yes, sergeant!” He lifted his hand near my face, slapped me gently twice and then pinched my cheek and said “Shayna Tatala, Bubbeleh, what’s a nice Jewish boy like you doing in a place like this?” Flummoxed, I said nothing. He leaned in close and quietly said “In a few minutes I’m going to ask for a volunteer. I want your hand to be the first one up. Got it?” I nodded and he moved on to terrorize the next recruit.
A few minutes later he announced that each of us would be assigned chores every day. “I need a volunteer for the first chore.” I raised mine immediately. My job? Shoe aligner. Twice a day I’d slap a stick across each airman’s bed and push the toes of their shoes against the stick so they were all perfectly aligned. Later I asked the sergeant if he was Jewish. No. He was Irish-Catholic and had grown up in the projects like me and had fond memories of his childhood Jewish friends. That was the last direct personal communication we had until I graduated from Basic.
A few days later, the sergeant led us through a lesson about the difference between lawful and unlawful orders, the Uniform Code of Military Justice and what would happen if we were stupid enough to disobey a lawful order just because we didn’t like it. We were having a great back and forth about what might constitute an unlawful order when Airmen Ogbern, a classic Forrest Gumpish guy interrupted another airman and said “Yeah, but ... .” “STOP!” the sergeant exploded. “If I ever hear any of you utter the stupidest phrase ever invented again I’ll smack you so hard you’ll be back in your mommy’s womb.” He then regaled us on “YABUT.”
“When you’re talking with someone, losing an argument, and you say “YABUT,” you’re being disrespectful and are about to say something useless. It’s deflection, changing the subject, drawing a false equivalence, switching to what you’d rather talk about. No yabuts in my flight, got it?”
We got it.
Recommended for you
As someone who has written quite a few guest columns here, hundreds of letters, op-eds, radio spots, and done a ton of public speaking over the years, his words still echo. I write about one thing and someone responds with “Yeah, but what about ... .” Mention some politician’s alleged misdeed and I can count on someone coming up with “Yeah, but what about that other politician?” Mention good news about the economy and someone says “Yeah, but what about immigration?” Decry a heinous act of violence and someone yells “Yeah, but what about some other act of violence?” After one of my recent guest columns about white nationalist violence, one frequent commenter demanded I answer questions about vaccines, the House Select Committee, immigration and even Novak Djokovic. I refused. I engaged with other comments that were on point, some that agreed and others that didn’t.
We progressives like to joke that when we bring up just about any issue someone on an opposite side will respond with “Yeah, but what about Hillary’s emails!” Oy! Frankly, I’m tired of YABUTWUTABOUT. It’s neither logical nor discourse. I’d rather engage on the subject at hand vigorously but politely, passionately and respectfully.
A few weeks ago, I watched a terrific event unfold in the U.S. Senate. They were debating and then voting on whether Finland and Sweden should be accepted into NATO. U.S. Sen. Rand Paul offered an amendment that he felt was needed to make it clear that despite Article 5 of the NATO Charter, which says that an attack on any NATO member is an attack on all, Congress was still the only entity that could “declare war.” There was heated back and forth on whether his amendment was necessary, helpful or harmful. Senators respectfully debated the amendment and the treaty, laser focused on the impact their decision would have on the United States and the world. This is the kind of discourse we need. No yabutwutabouts.
By the way, I never experienced antisemitism in my eight years of service. Anti-LGBTQ? Yep. And did I ever refuse an unlawful order? Stay tuned.
News: I will now be a regular biweekly columnist here in the DJ. I promise to write about immigration, vaccines, racial justice and more, but not Novak Djokovic. Please engage. No yabuts!
Craig Wiesner is the co-owner of Reach And Teach, a book, toy and cultural gift shop on 25th Avenue in San Mateo.
Thank you very much Mr. Wiesner, for a very timely and necessary reminder. Let’s just hope that “you-know-who” will read it, understand it, and behave in a more rational manner, in line with the Opinion site’s ground rules. Too many interesting LTEs with valid points have been side-tracked by all kinds of verbose “what-about-this-and-that’s” from commentators without any valid counter points, yet unable to resist the temptation to expose obvious ignorance.
Mr. Wiesner, that’s a new tactic… Trying to limit "speech" based on a military doctrine. Perhaps that might work if you were everyone’s ranking officer in a military world. Unfortunately, you’re in a civilian world, where the conversation goes where the conversation goes, regardless of whether you like it or not. Looking forward to what I assume are your columns every two weeks. YABUTWUTABOUT those folks expecting your columns twice a week? “Biweekly” isn’t clear. A superior officer commands you to “Write a biweekly column.” How would that work in a military world if you wrote every two weeks instead of twice a week? A lawful order not followed? An unlawful order?
It would be an ambiguous order and I would be responsible for clarifying it with the person giving the order. The column will be every two weeks. No violations of Article 92 of the UCMJ for me!
My .02 cents... I would not worry about any "what about?" remarks. Your column is a reflection of your thoughts and feelings about a particular subject. Done. If a reader has a different perspective, then he or she can say so. If they frame that different perspective simply as a "what about?" comment, that's on them.
IMO... it is possible for a "what about?" to bring context or possibly introduce something pertinent to a larger discussion, but such a comment needs something more than... "what about" this or that? We'll see what happens...
Kudos. This will be interesting. I think we need more "what abouts." Asking questions is the job of reporters and I don't think they are doing a very good job and haven't been for a long time. I wish we had a paper called "The Daily Whatabout."
A good example is this issue of the DJ. There is story about a guy getting beaten by police. Last graf notes everyone involved was white. Why?
I'm not sure we need more "what abouts?" just for what about's sake, but I do agree more questions should be asked. However, when questions are asked, I am disappointed when direct questions are dismissed simply as "what abouts?" I feel the person dismissing the questions is doing so because for some reason they do not want to answer the question.
Your comment sparked a nice memory for me. One of my favorite cozy mystery series by Lilian Jackson Braun, The Cat Who, features a quirky character named Jim Qwilleran, who writes a column for the local newspaper. The paper is called "The Moose County Something." Kinda like the Daily Whatabout! Many a fond hour was spent reading around 20 of those books. Thanks for reminding me!
A very enjoyable read with something for everyone to relate to. I look forward to your future columns. BTW, I can't for the life of me imagine who you would be talking about with a "YABUT" and deflection for a comment. (Tee Hee)
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(13) comments
Great first regular column. Glad you are on board.
Thank you very much Mr. Wiesner, for a very timely and necessary reminder. Let’s just hope that “you-know-who” will read it, understand it, and behave in a more rational manner, in line with the Opinion site’s ground rules. Too many interesting LTEs with valid points have been side-tracked by all kinds of verbose “what-about-this-and-that’s” from commentators without any valid counter points, yet unable to resist the temptation to expose obvious ignorance.
Mr. Wiesner, that’s a new tactic… Trying to limit "speech" based on a military doctrine. Perhaps that might work if you were everyone’s ranking officer in a military world. Unfortunately, you’re in a civilian world, where the conversation goes where the conversation goes, regardless of whether you like it or not. Looking forward to what I assume are your columns every two weeks. YABUTWUTABOUT those folks expecting your columns twice a week? “Biweekly” isn’t clear. A superior officer commands you to “Write a biweekly column.” How would that work in a military world if you wrote every two weeks instead of twice a week? A lawful order not followed? An unlawful order?
It would be an ambiguous order and I would be responsible for clarifying it with the person giving the order. The column will be every two weeks. No violations of Article 92 of the UCMJ for me!
Congrats, Craig... I'm looking forward to some columns that will inspire conversation and some columns that will just inspire.
Craig
My .02 cents... I would not worry about any "what about?" remarks. Your column is a reflection of your thoughts and feelings about a particular subject. Done. If a reader has a different perspective, then he or she can say so. If they frame that different perspective simply as a "what about?" comment, that's on them.
IMO... it is possible for a "what about?" to bring context or possibly introduce something pertinent to a larger discussion, but such a comment needs something more than... "what about" this or that? We'll see what happens...
Good luck!
Thank you!
Kudos. This will be interesting. I think we need more "what abouts." Asking questions is the job of reporters and I don't think they are doing a very good job and haven't been for a long time. I wish we had a paper called "The Daily Whatabout."
A good example is this issue of the DJ. There is story about a guy getting beaten by police. Last graf notes everyone involved was white. Why?
Hi, Will
I'm not sure we need more "what abouts?" just for what about's sake, but I do agree more questions should be asked. However, when questions are asked, I am disappointed when direct questions are dismissed simply as "what abouts?" I feel the person dismissing the questions is doing so because for some reason they do not want to answer the question.
Your comment sparked a nice memory for me. One of my favorite cozy mystery series by Lilian Jackson Braun, The Cat Who, features a quirky character named Jim Qwilleran, who writes a column for the local newspaper. The paper is called "The Moose County Something." Kinda like the Daily Whatabout! Many a fond hour was spent reading around 20 of those books. Thanks for reminding me!
Congratulations Craig - while we may differ in our political views you are an antidote for the more extreme LTE writers on this forum. Well deserved.
Thank you!
Craig,
A very enjoyable read with something for everyone to relate to. I look forward to your future columns. BTW, I can't for the life of me imagine who you would be talking about with a "YABUT" and deflection for a comment. (Tee Hee)
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.