When a friend first texted me a picture of one of the “Enforcement starts Feb. 2025” A-frame signs that now cover Bay Meadows, I knew this notice was different. For months, rumors of stricter monitoring of Bay Meadows’ two-hour parking spots had stirred up worried conversation among some of my Nueva School classmates, but there had never been any real follow-through. The new signs, however, left no room for doubt: “Vehicles parked in designated areas longer than two hours will be cited by the San Mateo Police Department.”
My school is located in the “commuter” community of Bay Meadows, which was built using a sustainable development model. The neighborhood, situated right next to the Hillsdale Caltrain Station and filled with a mix of apartments and shops, was designed to encourage walking, biking and public transit rather than car pollution.
A decade ago, the city imposed a two-hour street parking limit on all residential roads to reduce vehicle use. However, in 2020, one year before I entered high school, the city stopped enforcing the rule because of the pandemic. The police department recently announced that the restrictions will resume for all residents and visitors in February.
Because of the neighborhood’s focus on sustainability, students at my school are not supposed to park on the streets surrounding our campus, and the school does not offer parking. Instead, every student is offered a free go-pass to take the Caltrain. My school assumes that students will take the train, bike or have their parents drive them. This works for most students. But for some of us, avoiding driving is not a practical solution.
My parents both work and also have to drop off my younger sister at a different school, which is in the opposite direction of Bay Meadows. I live 10 minutes from the train station and 10 minutes from school. Taking the train would mean driving or biking in the wrong direction first, paying for parking in the lot, and still walking from the station, which would mean waking up much earlier. So, like some other students, I often drive to school. Since there’s no official parking, I’ve found alternatives using the two-hour zones in nearby neighborhoods that were rarely monitored. But starting in February, that won’t be an option.
I’ll admit that I technically could bike to school if I could get past waking up much earlier for my commute. Some students already do and, in an ideal world, I’d have the time and ability to make that switch. But as someone involved in sports, hauling gear on a bike every day isn’t very practical. Even if I did, there are still infrastructure issues on my way to school. Safe bike lanes, secure storage and overall accessibility need improvement before biking can be a viable alternative for everyone.
Recommended for you
Once parking enforcement resumes, my parents will likely have to drive me more often, resulting in twice the car trips and emissions. That is hardly a win for the sustainability Bay Meadows promotes.
With no straightforward alternatives, my mornings are about to get much more stressful. After first hearing about the change, I was frustrated. But then I began to wonder: Was this just an unreasonable crackdown, or was it the motivation I needed to reconsider my transportation methods?
While I still believe my reasons for driving myself are valid, I recognize there are ways I can start making better choices for the environment. Maybe that means carpooling with friends more often, and thus spending less on Caltrain fees, or biking on days when I don’t have sports practice.
I support Bay Meadows’ goal of fostering sustainability. Still, if local leaders want to reduce car dependency, they must ultimately aim to make public transportation the easier, cheaper and more logical option across the county. Sustainability efforts can’t only happen in one place. Until then, no amount of signage or enforcement will change the simple fact that, for many people, driving is the easiest option.
Josie Belfer is a senior at Nueva School in San Mateo. Student News appears in the weekend edition. You can email Student News at news@smdailyjournal.com.
It is disappointing that we adults haven't made car alternatives as attractive as driving for you. I applaud your willingness to put in the extra minutes each day to avoid driving to school. I think that you will find the extra time rewarding for your health and the feeling you get from knowing that you are doing your part to fight climate change and congestion.
I encourage you to engage the Nueva Administration on some of the issues that prevent you from biking to school - e.g., overnight storage of sports gear.
Keep up the good work and the planet is in good hands with students like you!
It does not require a genius to figure this one out.
The core of this article is this sentence:
"I’ll admit that I technically could bike to school if I could get past waking up much earlier for my commute."
This sentence means that liberal San Mateo traffic engineers and the liberal San Mateo city council have failed their liberal residents and especially children. In inner liberal-city traffic a bicycle should most certainly be the fastest and most convenient way of liberal transportation by now. You ride it directly from your liberal-home to your liberal-destination, where solid bike parking is just waiting for you.
Along the way the liberal city council would make sure you don't have to "share the road" with dangerous 4,000lbs EVs. Instead they would provide safe bike lanes and solid intersection treatment along the way.
Unfortunately San Mateo Democrats aren't that kind of people - hence biking seems to take longer for you than it should.
PS.: On the other hand If this is just about personal laziness and lack of willpower - you are on your own kiddie. Don't ask the government for help - think about it as 'building character'.
eGerd – Tbot here. Or…other geniuses can interpret the sentence you cite as pointing out that biking to school is inconvenient and inefficient. What happens if students need to lug home a musical instrument, or a science project, or a case of bottled water to a sports event? Uphill both ways?
You are talking to an expert here, so I don't see your problem. My kids did it for many years and liked it. Even in rain, they rather rode their bikes than taking the bus. As a child I felt exactly the same. Freedom of bicycles over bus schedules or mommy-pickup. It makes kids into better people and less entitled grownups. BUT all this requires better bicycle infrastructure that makes using a bicycle possible.
Large instruments (piano, drumset, tuba, trombone, ...) are hopefully stored at the school.
And you can carry a flute or triangle on a bike. And yes the school is allowed to give the kid transporting the Harp a parking spot and let the principal ride a bike instead. There is no law against that.
Now the bigger problem is that band practice is often early in the morning or late at night - and I definitely can't recommend nighttime riding in San Mateo County. But that again is on a city council that doesn't seem to like children very much.
Of course they could prove us wrong ... starting any time they want.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Thank you for the wonderful article!
It is disappointing that we adults haven't made car alternatives as attractive as driving for you. I applaud your willingness to put in the extra minutes each day to avoid driving to school. I think that you will find the extra time rewarding for your health and the feeling you get from knowing that you are doing your part to fight climate change and congestion.
I encourage you to engage the Nueva Administration on some of the issues that prevent you from biking to school - e.g., overnight storage of sports gear.
Keep up the good work and the planet is in good hands with students like you!
It does not require a genius to figure this one out.
The core of this article is this sentence:
"I’ll admit that I technically could bike to school if I could get past waking up much earlier for my commute."
This sentence means that liberal San Mateo traffic engineers and the liberal San Mateo city council have failed their liberal residents and especially children. In inner liberal-city traffic a bicycle should most certainly be the fastest and most convenient way of liberal transportation by now. You ride it directly from your liberal-home to your liberal-destination, where solid bike parking is just waiting for you.
Along the way the liberal city council would make sure you don't have to "share the road" with dangerous 4,000lbs EVs. Instead they would provide safe bike lanes and solid intersection treatment along the way.
Unfortunately San Mateo Democrats aren't that kind of people - hence biking seems to take longer for you than it should.
PS.: On the other hand If this is just about personal laziness and lack of willpower - you are on your own kiddie. Don't ask the government for help - think about it as 'building character'.
eGerd – Tbot here. Or…other geniuses can interpret the sentence you cite as pointing out that biking to school is inconvenient and inefficient. What happens if students need to lug home a musical instrument, or a science project, or a case of bottled water to a sports event? Uphill both ways?
You are talking to an expert here, so I don't see your problem. My kids did it for many years and liked it. Even in rain, they rather rode their bikes than taking the bus. As a child I felt exactly the same. Freedom of bicycles over bus schedules or mommy-pickup. It makes kids into better people and less entitled grownups. BUT all this requires better bicycle infrastructure that makes using a bicycle possible.
Large instruments (piano, drumset, tuba, trombone, ...) are hopefully stored at the school.
And you can carry a flute or triangle on a bike. And yes the school is allowed to give the kid transporting the Harp a parking spot and let the principal ride a bike instead. There is no law against that.
Now the bigger problem is that band practice is often early in the morning or late at night - and I definitely can't recommend nighttime riding in San Mateo County. But that again is on a city council that doesn't seem to like children very much.
Of course they could prove us wrong ... starting any time they want.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.