John Horgan

Standardized testing geared for undergraduate admission to colleges and universities has more than its share of outspoken critics. 

The time-honored practice has become a target for those who believe that such examinations are not always a good indicator of potential student success in the handling of higher education’s rigorous academic challenges. 

Additionally, there has been some concern that the tests are unfair for disadvantaged students who lack family resources and, consequently, don’t have access to test tutoring services or who attend academically weak high schools — or both.

In any event, the pandemic has been what amounts to a godsend for the naysayers. Limitations on indoor gatherings, by definition, discourage group test-taking.

A number of colleges and universities have announced that the tests now are optional or, in some cases, no longer an admissions factor at all.

Still, no matter how loud the foes of a standardized testing regimen have become, a no-nonsense, objective measurement of academic achievement continues to be important. It is one tool among many but it’s an important one.

A good example can be found in the tough competition for National Merit Scholarships. These are highly-prized monetary awards given to some best and brightest youngsters in the United States. More than $30 million worth of scholarships is at stake annually.

Standardized test results remain helpful, an early and needed baseline indication, if you will, that is used to winnow the field of high school juniors who seek to garner coveted National Merit prizes as seniors. 

National Merit officials began testing current juniors for what would be 2022 scholarships this past October. 

However, due to the pandemic’s distressing impact, a makeup date has been scheduled for that class: It is Jan. 26. Students in the Class of 2022 should contact their counselors for places and times for that examination.

The standardized test used is the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude/National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test.

Once semifinalists have been determined (typically, there are about 16,000 of them nationwide), they will be carefully evaluated on a variety of factors, including academic rigor, grade point average, extracurricular activities, leadership, employment and other metrics.

Winners of the scholarships are made public in the spring.

On a related note, 2021 National Merit semifinalists have been announced. San Mateo County has 102 of them; of those, 49 hail from comprehensive public high schools.

The remaining 53 seniors attend private, parochial and charter high schools; there is one home-schooled pupil as well.

Six schools have a total of 75 semifinalists between them: Nueva, 16; Menlo, 14; Carlmont, 13; Aragon, 11; Crystal Springs-Uplands, 11; Menlo-Atherton, 10.

For more information on the National Merit Scholarship program, which was founded in 1955, interested individuals can visit its website, nationalmerit.org, or call its Evanston, Illinois, offices at (847) 866-5100. 

AN ACADEMIC TWILIGHT ZONE: Still in an academic mode, John Egenolf, who spent his formative years in San Mateo, is a professor in the mathematics department at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks.

In his annual Christmas message to family and friends, he outlined in some detail what it’s like to be an isolated on-campus instructor dealing with a strictly virtual teaching experience during a pandemic as the Alaska winter shivers on.

He reported that he cannot work from home due to an unreliable internet signal. Here’s a portion of his latest Yuletide note:

“The math department building is almost completely empty because most people are working from home,” he wrote. “I rarely see anyone when I arrive. Nobody comes into the office wing while I am there and nobody is around when I leave.

“Some students are back living in the dorms, but they don’t attend any in-person classes so I rarely see anyone walking around campus. It’s like a ghost campus.

“The feeling is quite eerie, especially now with the winter darkness engulfing the campus. It’s like the start of a ‘Twilight Zone’ episode.

“You are waiting for the hammer to fall at any time,” he concluded. Rod Serling would have been pleased.

 

John Horgan, whose own high school and college experiences with the complex nuances of trigonometry and, heaven forbid, calculus were less than successful, can be contacted by the miracle of email at johnhorganmedia@gmail.com.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Ray Fowler

Hello, John

 

I disagree.  The pandemic did not boost the case made by standardized test naysayers... their case is strong enough.

 

Just how will the College Board develop a fair and objective tool for use by colleges in the college selection process?  They have not really done so thus far... the College Board's SAT has been around for 95 years.  The naysayers are quick to point out that we will not see any real changes because there is no reason for the College Board to make any substantive improvements.  Why do you think more and more colleges are dropping the College Board's SAT as a requirement for admission?  The SAT does not measure or capture an applicant's suitability for admission or serve as an indicator of academic success at the collegiate level.  It is merely a adequate assessment for determining how well a student does on a College Board test.  That's all.      

 

The College Board is a racket.  They develop tests then sell their products to help students to do well on their tests.  They have no competition.  There is no incentive for them to change what they do best... and that is to market testing materials to students with families able to buy the College Board's test prep materials and enroll their kids in expensive SAT and AP prep courses.  Your column verifies this market strategy.  Of the 102 juniors in San Mateo County qualified to become National Merit scholarship semifinalists, 52 of them attend private schools.

 

Oh, it gets better... one private school in San Jose with a junior class of 191 students had 42 students selected as semifinalists last October.  That's one private school.  How does that compare to the 50 public school kids in San Mateo County who were selected?  Maybe that should be an SAT question...

 

I feel you have hitched your wagon to the wrong star.  While superior academic achievement should be acknowledged and rewarded, charging the College Board with rewriting the SAT/NMSQT as a way to get there is not the answer.  

 

I wrote about the fundamental flaws surrounding the College Board program in an LTE about three and a half years ago.  Here it is:

https://www.smdailyjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/letter-college-board-testing/article_26623ea2-02dd-5787-8c80-acdadcfa368d.html

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!