MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Former Minneapolis Officer Derek Chauvin was convicted Tuesday of murder and manslaughter for pinning George Floyd to the pavement with his knee on the Black man's neck in a case that triggered worldwide protests, violence and a furious reexamination of racism and policing in the U.S.
Chauvin, 45, was immediately led away with his hands cuffed behind his back and could be sent to prison for decades.
The verdict — guilty on all counts, in a clear-cut victory for Floyd's supporters — set off jubilation tinged with sorrow around the city. Hundreds of people poured into the streets, some running through traffic with banners. Cars blared their horns.
"Today, we are able to breathe again," Floyd's younger brother Philonise said at a joyous family news conference where tears streamed down his face as he likened Floyd to the 1955 Mississippi lynching victim Emmett Till, except that this time there were cameras around to show the world what happened.
Another brother, Terrence Floyd, marveled, "What a day to be a Floyd, man."
The jury of six whites and six Black or multiracial people came back with its verdict after about 10 hours of deliberations over two days. The now-fired white officer was found guilty as charged of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
His face was obscured by a COVID-19 mask, and little reaction could be seen beyond his eyes darting around the courtroom. His bail was immediately revoked. Sentencing will be in two months; the most serious charge carries up to 40 years in prison.
Defense attorney Eric Nelson followed Chauvin out of the courtroom without comment.
President Joe Biden welcomed the verdict, saying Floyd's death was "a murder in full light of day, and it ripped the blinders off for the whole world" to see systemic racism.
But he warned: "It's not enough. We can't stop here. We're going to deliver real change and reform. We can and we must do more to reduce the likelihood that tragedies like this will ever happen again."
At a park next to the courthouse, a hush fell over a crowd of about 300 as they listened to the verdict on their cellphones. Then a great roar went up, with many people hugging, some shedding tears.
At the intersection where Floyd was pinned down, a crowd chanted, "One down, three to go!" — a reference to the three other fired Minneapolis officers facing trial in August on charges of aiding and abetting murder in Floyd's death.
Janay Henry, who lives nearby, said she felt grateful and relieved.
"I feel grounded. I can feel my feet on the concrete," she said, adding that she was looking forward to the "next case with joy and optimism and strength."
The verdict was read in a courthouse ringed with concrete barriers and razor wire and patrolled by National Guard troops, in a city on edge against another round of unrest — not just because of the Chauvin case but because of the deadly police shooting of a young Black man, Daunte Wright, in a Minneapolis suburb April 11.
The jurors' identities were kept secret and will not be released until the judge decides it is safe to do so.
It is unusual for police officers to be prosecuted for killing someone on the job. And convictions are extraordinarily rare.
Out of the thousands of deadly police shootings in the U.S. since 2005, fewer than 140 officers have been charged with murder or manslaughter, according to data maintained by Phil Stinson, a criminologist at Bowling Green State University. Before Tuesday, only seven were convicted of murder.
Recommended for you
Juries often give police officers the benefit of the doubt when they claim they had to make split-second, life-or-death decisions. But that was not an argument Chauvin could easily make.
Floyd, 46, died May 25 after being arrested on suspicion of passing a counterfeit $20 bill for a pack of cigarettes at a corner market. He panicked, pleaded that he was claustrophobic and struggled with police when they tried to put him in a squad car. They put him on the ground instead.
The centerpiece of the case was the excruciating bystander video of Floyd gasping repeatedly, "I can't breathe" and onlookers yelling at Chauvin to stop as the officer pressed his knee on or close to Floyd's neck for what authorities say was 9 1/2 minutes. Floyd slowly went silent and limp.
Prosecutors played the footage at the earliest opportunity, during opening statements, and told the jury: "Believe your eyes." And from there it was shown over and over, analyzed one frame at a time by witnesses on both sides.
In the wake of Floyd's death, demonstrations and scattered violence broke out in Minneapolis, around the country and beyond. The furor also led to the removal of Confederate statues and other offensive symbols such as Aunt Jemima.
In the months that followed, numerous states and cities restricted the use of force by police, revamped disciplinary systems or subjected police departments to closer oversight.
The "Blue Wall of Silence" that often protects police accused of wrongdoing crumbled after Floyd's death: The Minneapolis police chief quickly called it "murder" and fired all four officers, and the city reached a staggering $27 million settlement with Floyd's family as jury selection was underway.
Police-procedure experts and law enforcement veterans inside and outside the Minneapolis department, including the chief, testified for the prosecution that Chauvin used excessive force and went against his training.
Medical experts for the prosecution said Floyd died of asphyxia, or lack of oxygen, because his breathing was constricted by the way he was held down on his stomach, his hands cuffed behind him, a knee on his neck and his face jammed against the ground.
Chauvin's attorney called a police use-of-force expert and a forensic pathologist to help make the case that Chauvin acted reasonably against a struggling suspect and that Floyd died because of an underlying heart condition and his illegal drug use.
Floyd had high blood pressure, an enlarged heart and narrowed arteries, and fentanyl and methamphetamine were found in his system.
Under the law, police have certain leeway to use force and are judged according to whether their actions were "reasonable" under the circumstances.
The defense also tried to make the case that Chauvin and the other officers were hindered in their duties by what they perceived as a growing, hostile crowd.
Chauvin did not testify, and all that the jury or the public ever heard by way of an explanation from him came from a police body-camera video after an ambulance had taken the 6-foot-4, 223-pound Floyd away. Chauvin told a bystander: "We gotta control this guy 'cause he's a sizable guy ... and it looks like he's probably on something."
The prosecution's case also included tearful testimony from onlookers who said the police kept them back when they protested what was happening.
Eighteen-year-old Darnella Frazier, who shot the crucial video, said Chauvin just gave the bystanders a "cold" and "heartless" stare. She and others said they felt a sense of helplessness and lingering guilt from witnessing Floyd's death.
"It's been nights I stayed up, apologizing and apologizing to George Floyd for not doing more, and not physically interacting and not saving his life," she said.
___
Find AP's full coverage of the death of George Floyd at: https://apnews.com/hub/death-of-george-floyd

(6) comments
With all the coverage and emotions about the trial I am surprised there are no comments from both the for and against crowd. Where are the negative nellies saying that the jury was rigged just like the last election and Chauvin was made a scapegoat to satisfy the BLM crowd? On the other side there should be many saying that justice was done for a change and that Chauvin was indeed a bad cop that needed to be prosecuted for the obvious crime.
Hey, Tafhdyd
Here you are! I don't think there are many in the "against" crowd. There may be some differences about what level of homicide would fit this crime, but I don't know anyone who thought Chauvin was acting within the scope of department policy, approved tactics or the law. It didn't matter whether Chauvin intended to kill or even seriously injure George Floyd... he caused Floyd's death... no one else.
Ray,
We are in agreement along with most of the civilized world like you say. You do know someone that thinks Chauvin was acting properly, maybe not personally, but it is our buddy Terence. I have been waiting for Terence to man up and admit he was wrong. He was sure that anyway you cut it Chauvin was innocent and Floyd killed himself with drugs and resisting arrest etc. I saved his comment from March and will wait and see if he checks in.
Found you. I was wondering where you were taking my name in vain. Sorry, Taffy, the verdicts were a travesty of justice, but not unexpected. After all, when you’re in a Democrat city and state, when you have pot-stirrer Mad Maxine inciting violence if there’s no guilty verdict, when you have race-baiter Sharpton calling for a guilty verdict, when you have thugs promising to burn the city down, and when you have talking heads in the lamestream media calling for guilty verdicts, the writing is on the wall. Add jurors not being sequestered, being aware of the threats of destruction, and knowing their names would be released to the public, these jurors knew an innocent verdict could harm their community and more importantly, themselves and their families. What exactly did you think was going to happen?
Unsurprisingly, there were still idiot rioters, even in Portland (not really surprised at that). So sorry, I’m not admitting I’m wrong. Peer pressure and threats of violence have perverted the course of justice. I’m looking forward to the retrial. I’m also looking forward to politicians now inserting themselves into trials calling for guilty or innocent verdicts and inciting violence if they don’t get their desired outcome. BTW, if anyone needs to man up for being wrong, you might want to ask yourself why you continue spreading your debunked Republican to Democrat party switcheroo hoax. And although I’m honored you saved my comment (I didn’t realize you were such a big fan), your time is better spent trying to learn the truth and maybe even reading some of the links you post so you don’t get caught unaware, again.
Terence,
I expected nothing less from you. As a true Trump idol you follow his lead, accept no responsibility and always blame others. Good job.
Taffy – you mean following the lead of our great President Trump in Making America Great Again? Following Trump in fighting for truth, justice, and the American way? Similar to another guy who’s faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive…? Thanks for the compliment, Taffy. Regarding no responsibility and blaming others, that smacks of your tendency for projection where you assign Democrat values to others. In doing that, I expected nothing less from you.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.