A new downtown South San Francisco residential development proposal viewed as critical to invigorate the city’s redesigned Caltrain station stands to take a step forward at a meeting this week.

The city’s special housing committee of the City Council and Planning Commission will weigh Wednesday, May 29, a proposal to construct 94 apartments at 200 Airport Blvd.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Marko

How many parking spaces are being made available for 150+ residents of this project? How many spaces for the new commercial occupant(s)? And how many next door at 150 Airport (another 250+ residents)?

Very likely - not enough...

Over and over we bring up the point that REDUCING DEPENDENCY on private vehicles is **NOT THE SAME** as ELIMINATING THEM.

These folks may take the train, or hail Lyft on the way to work every day, but they'll own AT LEAST one car per unit. And those trips to Costco, or Lucky, Lowes, and CVS aren't going to be made on bikes or public transport (much less the rides to Pt. Reyes or visits to Mom).

We've already noticed visitors to Pinefino residents are choking Cypress and Grand - and the 201 Grand project (100+ residents plus 3-4 stores) isn't underway yet...

I call out Alex Greenwood to sit down with Austin Walsh and a couple of us who've lived in SSF longer than he's been alive. Maybe someone from SSFPF/SSFFD, and a P&D committeeperson. Let's talk this through...

jenpoobear

Sounds like another poorly thought out project similar to the one in Belmont just approved, called "Nightmare on Old County Road" - a 250 unit apartment building with only 258 underground parking stalls?? On a street that is already clogged due to 101 and El Camino being congested all the time. The small businesses such as the auto shops can't get in and out of their driveways, already no parking for customers. And the lame excuse for building it close to public transportation, "it will get people out of cars and using Caltrain"! No it won't! People want their cars to go to San Fransico and San Jose for nightlife, to Half Moon Bay for the beach, etc. Just another selfish project only bringing in a negative impact to the surroundings. Such selfish people on these council boards!!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here