Repairing and replacing existing facilities, a greater variety of park features and enhancing trails are San Bruno resident priorities when it comes to the cityās park system, consultant Lauren Ivey-Thomas said.Ā
According to an online survey with 1,113 total respondents, 90% of whom identified themselves as residents, thereās a strong interest in what Ivey-Thomas termed āpark basicsā ā enhancing the amenities that parks already have in place.Ā
That includes playgrounds, play equipment, athletics facilities like tennis, basketball and baseball courts, as well as improving ADA accessibility on existing features.Ā
In addition, residents ā a great majority of who visit the parks more than once a week, Ivey-Thomas said ā are interested in a greater variety of amenities like challenge elements, dog parks, bike racks, pet waste stations and artwork. Enhancing trails and natural elements was another top priority.Ā
Only 52% of respondents had children in the household, Ivey-Thomas said, emphasizing the importance of nature and parks access to the community as a whole.Ā
āParks are not just relevant to those who have children and families,ā she said. āParks are relevant as a whole to your San Bruno community.āĀ
The consulting firm also surveyed the functionality of the 19 existing parks within San Bruno city limits, excluding the Crestmoor Canyon Open Space because it doesnāt provide active recreation activities.Ā
Thereās one community park, dubbed City Park, that spans 28.9 acres. Thirteen parks within the city are designed as neighborhood parks, and five are pocket parts, used mostly by adjacent neighborhoods.Ā
Recommended for you
According to the study, a majority of parks assets ā including outdoor recreation, trails and sports fields ā fall into the āgood,ā āfairā and āpoorā categories, meaning they are either working well with some deficiencies, functional but leaning toward failing or essentially unusable.Ā
āTo compare to other communities in the Bay Area, this is a massive portion of your assets that are in a fair to poor condition, and if this isnāt addressed sooner, this is going to extend to deferred maintenance,ā Ivey-Thomas said.Ā
Ivey-Thomas said parks rated the highest in the city include Earl-Glenview Park, Florida Avenue Park and Grundy Park, while the worst-rated includes Fleetwood Park and Seventh Avenue Park.Ā Ā
A socioeconomic analysis of the city found that the east side of the city suffers from the greatest need, including high numbers of pollution, the least health conditions and the greatest health insecurity. The good news, however, is that city staff are working diligently to maintain parks in that area, Ivey-Thomas said.Ā
āThe parks are functioning as well as they can on the east side, and if anything we saw parks on the west side were in need of improvement,ā she said.Ā
Though the parks system in the city requires continuing improvement, Mayor Rico Medina emphasized that the city has offered increasing recreation services throughout the years.Ā
āAs far as offering those opportunities and rentals, when you look from a historical perspective, we have evolved,ā he said.
Did the online survey ask San Bruno residents how much they would pay in additional taxes to support and enhance parks? If we factor in costs, would residents still have āstrong interestā in enhancing parks? I doubt enhancement of parks will be provided by volunteers or donations to cover costs.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means youāre helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Did the online survey ask San Bruno residents how much they would pay in additional taxes to support and enhance parks? If we factor in costs, would residents still have āstrong interestā in enhancing parks? I doubt enhancement of parks will be provided by volunteers or donations to cover costs.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.