Concerns over a partnership placing police on local campuses could lead to San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District officials amending or terminating the school resource officer program.

The district Board of Trustees discussed the partnership with the San Mateo Police Department last week, and will consider alterations at the upcoming meeting Thursday, Aug. 6.

The discussion mirrors a national examination taking place simultaneously, with school officials questioning the need for officers on campuses in light of the growing social justice and racial equity movement.

Noelia Corzo

Noelia Corzo

Citing fears that the program could lead to disproportionate enforcement among students from communities of color, board President Noelia Corzo said she has long been skeptical of the need for school resource officers.

“I have always been concerned about SROs in our schools,” said Corzo.

A conversation at last week’s meeting with the San Mateo Police Department seemed to compound some of those concerns, as Corzo said she was frustrated more detailed data about interactions between police and students on campus was unavailable.

“That data is essential,” said Corzo, regarding the need for reports breaking down the racial composition of students contacted by police on district property.

Trustee Shara Watkins agreed, and said both the department and school district need to do a better job of tracking the matter.

Shara Watkins

Shara Watkins

“I’m definitely not absolving us of the work we need to do,” said Watkins.

The school resource officer program has grown over the past few years to place two or three officers circulating through the district’s middle schools. A presentation by police Capt. Dave Norris during the meeting indicated police consider the program an essential mechanism for building relationships with students.

“This is a really important program that is producing really important results,” he said.

The partnership is also the platform for the Gang Resistance Education And Training, or GREAT, intervention program which police said builds awareness among local students about the dangers associated with gang affiliation.

“Our juvenile diversion program has proved to be especially effective in providing an alternative for young people who would have otherwise been referred to the criminal justice system for prosecution,” department spokesman Officer Michael Haobsh said in a prepared statement.

Some trustees held a different perspective though, nodding to concerns raised by community members regarding negative interactions between officers, students and members of the school community.

For her part, Watkins said she would favor putting the resource officer program on hold for at least one year to gather more input from the school community before returning for more conversations about potential refinements to the program.

“That needs to come from the kids and families that are in our schools and in our community that are being impacted by police,” said Watkins, regarding potential amendments to the program.

Corzo agreed, saying she favored pausing the partnership while looking for ways to make it work better for the entire school community.

Board Vice President Ken Chin said he was less certain which direction he would like to see the program take, but favored looking more closely at the initiative.

“I think there is always an opportunity for us to improve,” said Chin.

He noted since the program started, the district has added more counselors capable of helping students with issues which previously might have fallen to teachers or resources officers.

As the district’s capabilities have built up, he suggested it may be time to examine whether the responsibilities of all personnel on campus can be refined to best meet the current needs of students.

Corzo expressed a similar sentiment, suggesting money used by the district to pay for the school resource officer program could be allocated toward other, more necessary initiatives.

“Those funds could be used in different ways,” she said.

To identify the best way to spend the money, Corzo acknowledged it could require conversations around race and law enforcement which may be difficult — but necessary.

“It’s going to be hard. But guess what is also hard? All the kids that have been living in our education system without the support they should have gotten,” she said.

Meanwhile, Haobsh said the department remains dedicated to assisting the district in any possible fashion.

“The San Mateo Police Department will always make itself available as a resource for all of our schools,” he said. “We are deeply committed to serving our creative and talented young people and will continue to develop effective and innovative programs that contribute to their success.”

The San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District Board of Trustees meets 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 6. Visit https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88057482264 to watch the meeting.

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Recommended for you

(2) comments

r_paynter

Speaking to CConway's remark above, the citizens served by the San Mateo-Foster City School District are encouraged to attend school board meetings. If they cannot make it, they can catch up on what they missed by viewing the meeting on the Board of Trustees' youtube channel. For example, the 2 1/2 hour discussion on this topic began 1 hour 26 minutes into the 7 1/2 hour meeting, link here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A4Q9-18nRk). Citizens of the San Mateo-Foster City School District provided public comments for 45 of those minutes. If you really want to hear from a variety of voices how this issue affects the education of our children, what is best for society, and even what might help to increase test scores, I would encourage you to take a listen.

The trustees of the San Mateo-Foster City School District have served generously during this pandemic. With the exception of 7/2, the Board has met weekly since 6/18 (plus an additional study session on 6/27) for meetings that average 5 hours 45 minutes. I've attended every one of their public meetings, and from my view this board is doing the work they have been elected to do, doing it publicly, and doing it with what our students need as their driving focus.

Christopher Conway

How come I get the feeling that citizens of these districts will not be heard when we call these discussions absurd. Like I said before, I am so grateful my child does not have to attend a public school. This is the kind of nonsense they discuss, not the education of the child or what is best for our society, just special interest topics that have no affect on increasing test scores.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!