Sanjay Gehani

Sanjay Gehani

Foster City Councilman Sanjay Gehani has violated the Brown Act, but no punitive action will be taken, according to San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe.

The Brown Act was passed by the California legislature in 1953 to ensure transparency in local government. It specifically prohibits a councilmember from “discussing an item of business that is within the subject matter of a jurisdiction of the council with a majority of the council outside of a noticed meeting,” according to a letter dated Aug. 9 that Wagstaffe sent to both Gehani and City Attorney Jean Savaree.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Jeff Regan

Herb Perez lecturing on ethics. Wow.


Jeff Regan

Vice Mayor Herb Perez, while Mayor in 2016, was given a Brown Act Violation warning from the DA. Please take any quotes from now Vice Mayor Perez with a large grain of salt, as well as his complicit Mayor.


Eaadams

Text of DA Letter.







Stephen M. Wagstaffe, District Attorney











CHIEF DEPUTY ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS



ALBERT SERRATO JAMES WADE



SEAN F. GALLAGHER



SHIN-MEE CHANG



COUNTY OF SAN MATEO



400 COUNTY CENTER, 3RD FLOOR | REDWOOD CITY | CALIFORNIA 94063 | TEL: (650) 363-4636



August 9, 2019



Councilman Sanjay Gehani



____________________



Foster City, CA 94404



RE: May 2019 Brown Act Violation







Dear Councilman Gehani:







As you are aware, a complaint was made to our office alleging that you violated the



Brown Act (California Government Code Section 54950, et.seq.) by discussing a potential item of business with a majority of the City Council outside of a noticed meeting. Our review included obtaining statements from City Manager Jeff Moneda, Councilmembers Herb Perez,



Catherine Mahanpour, Richa Awasthi, Sam Hindi and yourself, a review of the May 20, 2019 Council meeting and a discussion with City Attorney Jean Savaree.







We examined the statute at issue, Government Code Section 54952.2, specifically



subsections (a) and (b)(1). Those sections prohibit a Council member from discussing an item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council with a majority of the Council outside of a noticed meeting.







From our investigation, it appears you understood that your proposal for redeveloping the old El Torito restaurant as a pre-school would require City Council involvement and/or approval and, in fact, you indicated to City Manager Moneda that you intended to be the spokesperson for the project when it was presented to the Council. Further, you indicated to Mr. Moneda you believed you already had the support of two council members, proving that you had prior



conversations with at least those two council members. Interviews with Council members



established you discussed the proposal with three other Council persons.







Thus, we do find that you violated Section 54952.1(b)(1) by conducting what is referred



to as a ‘serial meeting’ with other members of a legislative body, one at a time, until you had



discussed with a majority of the Council your intention to buy and redevelop the El Torito site.







That effort would qualify as ‘business’ within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council in that the Council would have to approve a “General Plan Amendment” for the project to proceed







As no action was taken by the Council on this matter, there is no need for any ‘cure and



correct’ remedy. Further, we will decline to take any further action on this matter since we believe there is no pervasive failure by you nor this Council to abide by the regulations and spirit of the Act in conducting the business of the City of Foster City. The Brown Act exists to ensure the legislative process is conducted in an open and transparent manner so that the public can be informed of actions taken by their representatives. We trust and expect this will serve as a reminder to all members of the Council of the importance of due caution in discussing matters that are clearly within the jurisdiction of the Council.











Sincerely,







STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY







By:



Sean F. Gallagher, Assistant District Attorney





Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here