The founder of Draper University threatened to move it out of downtown San Mateo during a Planning Commission meeting Tuesday after officials expressed continued reservation about proposed changes to the historic Benjamin Franklin Hotel where it is located.

The Planning Commission remains unconvinced by the proposed changes to the university downtown building at 44 E. Third Ave., which calls for an additional elevator and staircase at the back of the building that the Planning Commission fears could alter the overall aesthetic of the historic downtown building, which it wants to protect. The elevator would run to the top of the building and be visible from the outside. The building is part of the downtown Historic District but is not formally listed as a historic resource under the state or national registry, according to the city. It was built in 1926 and operated as the Benjamin Franklin Hotel until 2003.

Founder Tim Draper was frustrated that after putting $3 million a year into the city and several years of planning to meet city requests and concerns, the proposed changes appear stalled at the Planning Commission.

“We’ve been four years trying to make this thing work. Two years since we applied, and now you guys are just shutting us down. What is this? What are you thinking? Are you thinking, San Mateo, it’s a wonderful place, everybody is going to just keep coming? Let’s just keep part of these buildings the way they are. They’re not. They’re gonna leave. I’m gonna leave. I am going to sell the [building],” Draper said.

Draper University is a for-profit university offering entrepreneurship programs to students to develop startup skills needed in business. Founded in 2012 by Draper, the school offers a five-week Hero Training at its downtown campus. It gives students the chance to hear speakers from Silicon Valley and workshop business ideas with other classmates. It also offers online virtual programs to students.

Draper said if the Planning Commission didn’t allow him to run his business and make it successful, he would have to move to Redwood City or Austin, Texas. He also claimed the regulation attempts to minimize changes to historic downtown buildings from the Planning Commission would lead to a “ghost town.”

“I don’t think you are looking at this the right way. I get it; you are on the Planning Commission. You’ve got to focus on these details; you’ve got to make them work. Everything has got to make sense,” Draper said.

According to a city report, certain materials proposed for the elevator, like a glaze, could be harmful to the building’s Spanish Colonial Revival style. Some on the Planning Commission were more open to proposed changes to the top three floors of the university from dormitories to offices.

The Planning Commission expressed initial hesitation about the same potential building changes at its December meeting due to similar concerns. It asked the university to note its changes for any following presentations. Following the December meeting, the applicant team told the city it would not significantly redesign its proposal, which promoted the January meeting so the applicant’s team could explain its design process and thinking, according to the city.

Commissioner Mike Etheridge did not support the change in use proposal and felt parts of the project were inconsistent with the proposed project design. He also felt the glass elevator would take attention away and contradict the building’s Spanish architecture style.

“I don’t believe that putting offices on the top is justification for making the kind of extreme changes to the exterior,” Etheridge said.

Commissioner John Ebneter did not feel putting a dedicated exterior elevator with views was important enough to the downtown area to deviate from the building’s historical nature.

“I do not support the changes that I see tonight,” Ebneter said.

Commissioner Margaret Williams said she was supportive of the change of use for the top three floors but was concerned about the elevator as designed. Commission Vice Chair Ramiro Maldonado said he couldn’t approve the design structure as currently proposed. He asked the applicant to reconsider an elevator design that keeps the historical style.

Commission Chair Ellen Mallory said the proposal did not go with the building’s general style and feel.

“I place great value on the historic resources in the city, and I feel that iconic buildings such as this should be respected and not changed radically so that they are not iconic buildings anymore,” Mallory said.

Draper said by email after the meeting he wants to make the building shine again and attract venture capitalists to come mentor and fund students at the university. The project process has been four years in the making, with two years spent working with the city before the university could apply for review by the Planning Commission. Draper said various San Mateo councilmembers over the past few years were enthusiastic about the university renovation. He also disputed that the building is historic and said he has no intentions of making it historical.

“Draper University and Hero City are a labor of love for me. They are loss leaders that cost me about $3 million each year, but I love what they have done for the city, creating thousands of great jobs, diversity and notoriety for the city. I understand that the Planning Commission is a thankless job, but I think they are throwing away a very good thing. I hear Redwood City is much more willing to work with businesses. And Austin, Texas, is downright business-friendly,” Draper said.

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(9) comments


Tim Draper said that many former Council members and staff have been supportive of the proposed changes. I have not heard of this support. Does anyone know more about this? It would be helpful to the discussion to understand the specifics of this past support. It seems as if the Planning Commission has been clear in its concern about the proposed changes. It is important to stay grounded in facts when talking about important issues like this, It alo is important to remember the context of this building being part of San Mateo's Downtown Historic District.


Just to be historically accurate, Founding Father Ben Franklin is not the inspiration for the name of the hotel. Quoting a Daily Journal article from 2001, "The hotel does not bear the name of the famous stateman from Philadelphia, but rather a amalgamation of its original owners, A.C. Franklin and Benjamin Getz."


Thank you. Next time I pass by, I'll have to imagine how the original owners came up with that!


It just hit me that this building was named after Ben Franklin, one of the most thoughtful and progressive minds in the history of our nation. I sincerely doubt he would want his name associated with a fossil that is frozen in time due to bureaucracy.

Keep the historic charm, yes, but please let's have smart development in this city. If Draper wants to spend money on tasteful additions and improvements that pay at least a little homage to the history, then I support that.

If Draper decides to move, it'll be very tough to find a new owner given the situation. Is there enough nostalgia for it to become a hotel again? Will post-Covid tourists see value in walkability around downtown San Mateo?


Losing the original Ben Franklin Hotel and its 'look' was a travesty.

Patrick Henry

City Hall has turned into its own little Cabal, dispensing favors for the connected and issuing penalties to the undeserving. There is a huge stench emanating for 330 W 20th Avenue in San Mateo, these people are running their own fiefdom. The only good news is through their foolishness they have finally woken up the electorate. A glass elevator on the Ben Franklin sounds like a great idea that I would like to ride. I am wondering if these city planners ever heard of private property or do they think they own every structure in our city? .


Patrick, I remember when you and I and Chris Conway use to hang out on the sun deck and chat up the then Stewardesses from United Airlines. We would hang out at the bar - Club Seville.

Christopher Conway

Swimming Pool with Stewardesses at the Benjamin Franklin? I am afraid Mikey is a little closer to my inner circle than I first thought.



Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!