Our sacred responsibility of living in a democracy is demanding a great deal of us these days.
I came of age in the 1960s when marching against the Vietnam War or on behalf of civil rights was something an overwhelming number of citizens did because they believed power emanated from the consent of the governed. And, because a single march could evolve into a political movement — could help end a war, could lead to the passage of laws protecting the rights of all Americans, regardless of the color of their skin — to be alive in that dawn felt like patriotism of the highest order.
That dawn must be upon us again.
Our country is testing us. Certainly, by a president who believes he exists beyond constitutional law — the law is what he says it is — but also by our system of government, which to survive is demanding of us the exercise of our participatory democratic muscle. A muscle that for many — myself included — has atrophied because the freedoms and rights we take for granted have never been much in doubt. We assume them to be our natural condition. But, democracy’s erosion begins when its citizens lose the practice of taking up the cause of democracy. In ways large and small, we must come to democracy’s aid.
A few days after the marches where more than 7 million people gathered on the streets of our country to protest the authoritarianism of our nation’s current president, I came across a book by the historian Arthur Schlesinger about John F. Kennedy’s brief presidency — “A Thousand Days” — written soon after Kennedy’s time in office.
There was an inscription handwritten at the front of this particular book — it apparently had been a Christmas gift from one woman friend to another — which ignited a powerful wave of nostalgia within me. But my nostalgia was not precisely for President Kennedy.
Besides Kennedy’s breath, winter-white on the frigid Washington January day of his inauguration when he asked what people could do for their country, and later, his tragic assassination, the historical details of his presidency slipped by my young experience.
But the personal inscription inside Schlesinger’s book held weight: “To one, as you are,” the friend’s words read, “who follows in the light of this President’s idealism. Always may it shine for you.”
Recommended for you
That was it. But those 20 words reached out to me from a time when our country, to paraphrase the poet Langston Hughes, was about letting America be the dream the dreamers dreamed.
I cannot imagine seeing those words written in the books of history charting our current era, for idealism finds little sanctuary when the leadership of our country demonstrates so little faith in the cathedral of democracy.
The worst has ceased to surprise us — many have become desensitized to it. The ideal as found in “the better angels of our nature” can feel as distant as President Lincoln reciting those words at his first inaugural in 1861. Just then, slavery was alive in the land and the country was soon to be riven by Civil War. But, even then, our president spoke of our “bonds of affection” and the “mystic chords of memory” enshrined within the democratic vision of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Terrible trouble loomed before him, yet he still implored a fractured nation to find a common national feeling that might lift all people up. He believed compassion and equality must reside in democracy’s heart if democracy is to survive. Certainly, he never would have approved of the vilification of opposing thought and speech and the dark retribution that has been unleashed against millions of his fellow citizens by our current president.
No country is exactly like our own, our always fragile — sometimes frail — political project. Yet because we don’t live at the end of history and we cannot see democracy beyond our lifetimes, our vigilance — our public engagement on democracy’s behalf — must be constant so that our self-government will endure.
The Founders ended the Declaration of Independence with the word “honor.” They pledged their “sacred honor” so that self-government might become the truth of a new nation. It’s this sacred honor that connects us to those revolutionaries who bequeathed us our country 250 years ago. We share the burden — and the ideals — of that honor, calling to us from our past to protect the soul of this country: its justice, its freedoms, its compassion.
To protest demands of us idealism: a belief that voices matter, that standing up means something, that we’re never without power.
It is our turn in our nation’s history to pledge ourselves to the difficult task of not losing what was once found.
Mike Nagler taught for many years at Cañada College and was a member of the Burlingame Library Board and Foundation.
I truly wonder why it takes Mr. Nagler so many words to tell us that he suffers from TDS. After all of these months in office, I am still trying to figure out how and why President Trump somehow is a threat to our democratic system. Whenever he may have gone overboard, the Courts have curtailed him and no harm is done. It would behoove Mr. Nagler, with all of his knowledge, to pen something that is more original than the claptrap provided by his Dem handlers. If there were an example of Constitutional violations, we just suffered through Prop 50 which will be overturned anyway because of a prior Supreme Court ruling. The voters were fooled by Newsom who just got more press to bolster his political career at our expense.
Agreed Mike. Trump, the worst president in the history of our republic, is an ever present danger to our democracy who flaunts the Constitution because he believes he has all the power to act out his petty grievances and retributions. As yesterday's election results have shown, the voters will slowly take back responsible governance and make Trump the lamest of lame ducks. Republicans have much to fear in next year's midterms as the House, and maybe the Senate, become more responsive to the will of the voters. The pendulum is beginning to swing back to the honoring of our Constitution and the elimination of the scourge we are now enduring.
Hilarious. Let’s not forget that Rel still tries to blame our (yes, our) great President Trump for the 1/6 riot which occurred due to Pelosi’s admitted dereliction of duty to protect the Capitol. If Rel is willing to lie about that then how can we lend credence to anything Rel writes? It’d be nice if Rel contributed something useful to a conversation and educated us on why Democrats support criminals and terrorists more than the American people. Meanwhile, Pelosi is retiring and in my book, that’s another win. I’m still not tired of winning. Have a Trump-tastic day!
Thank you, Mr. Nagler, for your inspiring words and memories. As a contemporary, who came of age fighting for civil rights, women's rights, and protections for the marginalized in our society, I am horrified at the ripping back of so many hard won victories in what seems like an instant from this vicious regime of conmen and oligarchs. To have to fight again at our age is daunting, but necessary.
Hilarious. Hey SMpool, you say you fight for women’s rights yet you continue to be unable to explain why you identify with the Democrat party that advocates for biological men claiming they’re women to compete, steal medals, and in some instances injure biological women. Or why it’s okay for men to use women’s locker rooms (a la Planet Fitness). Or whether it would be okay for men claiming to be women advertise as woman-owned businesses.
You say you fight for women but that was the past because as it is now, you’re fighting for women to lose rights. To fight again at any age is daunting but necessary if you want to retain the rights women fought for and won. Please fight for common sense instead of following what Democrat leaders command you to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Here we go again...Mr. Nagler following a recent trend by columnists, Ms. Tsai and Mr. Wiesner, in penning a nearly 800 word column repeating easily debunked illogical Democrat talking points in a feeble attempt to manufacture outrage. Hey Mr. Nagler, don’t you think if our (yes, our) great President Trump were a threat to democracy, he would have already done so? You seem to think your alleged 7 million people marching means something but it doesn’t to the vast majority of 333 million people where many, I imagine, enjoy the spectacle and wonder how many of those marchers marched during Vietnam. I wonder if any spectators play a version of “I Spy” where participants attempt to identify as many furries and inflatable characters as they can.
Perhaps, Mr. Nagler, you’re confusing treasonous Biden and Obama with Trump, as those two were much more of a threat to democracy than President Trump ever will be. Meanwhile, Trump, the greatest president of our lifetimes, twice, continues to Make America Great Again, Again. ICE enforcement continues to ramp up. Another drug boat was smoked. Criminals crossing our southern border are virtually nonexistent. Those who manufactured crimes against Trump are being prosecuted. And the list goes on. BTW, in addition to the Declaration of Independence, we have the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps you can refresh Democrats on sections related to invaders to our country and ask why Democrats are so willing to put the welfare of invaders ahead of the American people. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
I truly wonder why it takes Mr. Nagler so many words to tell us that he suffers from TDS. After all of these months in office, I am still trying to figure out how and why President Trump somehow is a threat to our democratic system. Whenever he may have gone overboard, the Courts have curtailed him and no harm is done. It would behoove Mr. Nagler, with all of his knowledge, to pen something that is more original than the claptrap provided by his Dem handlers. If there were an example of Constitutional violations, we just suffered through Prop 50 which will be overturned anyway because of a prior Supreme Court ruling. The voters were fooled by Newsom who just got more press to bolster his political career at our expense.
Agreed Mike. Trump, the worst president in the history of our republic, is an ever present danger to our democracy who flaunts the Constitution because he believes he has all the power to act out his petty grievances and retributions. As yesterday's election results have shown, the voters will slowly take back responsible governance and make Trump the lamest of lame ducks. Republicans have much to fear in next year's midterms as the House, and maybe the Senate, become more responsive to the will of the voters. The pendulum is beginning to swing back to the honoring of our Constitution and the elimination of the scourge we are now enduring.
Hilarious. Let’s not forget that Rel still tries to blame our (yes, our) great President Trump for the 1/6 riot which occurred due to Pelosi’s admitted dereliction of duty to protect the Capitol. If Rel is willing to lie about that then how can we lend credence to anything Rel writes? It’d be nice if Rel contributed something useful to a conversation and educated us on why Democrats support criminals and terrorists more than the American people. Meanwhile, Pelosi is retiring and in my book, that’s another win. I’m still not tired of winning. Have a Trump-tastic day!
Thank you, Mr. Nagler, for your inspiring words and memories. As a contemporary, who came of age fighting for civil rights, women's rights, and protections for the marginalized in our society, I am horrified at the ripping back of so many hard won victories in what seems like an instant from this vicious regime of conmen and oligarchs. To have to fight again at our age is daunting, but necessary.
Hilarious. Hey SMpool, you say you fight for women’s rights yet you continue to be unable to explain why you identify with the Democrat party that advocates for biological men claiming they’re women to compete, steal medals, and in some instances injure biological women. Or why it’s okay for men to use women’s locker rooms (a la Planet Fitness). Or whether it would be okay for men claiming to be women advertise as woman-owned businesses.
You say you fight for women but that was the past because as it is now, you’re fighting for women to lose rights. To fight again at any age is daunting but necessary if you want to retain the rights women fought for and won. Please fight for common sense instead of following what Democrat leaders command you to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Here we go again...Mr. Nagler following a recent trend by columnists, Ms. Tsai and Mr. Wiesner, in penning a nearly 800 word column repeating easily debunked illogical Democrat talking points in a feeble attempt to manufacture outrage. Hey Mr. Nagler, don’t you think if our (yes, our) great President Trump were a threat to democracy, he would have already done so? You seem to think your alleged 7 million people marching means something but it doesn’t to the vast majority of 333 million people where many, I imagine, enjoy the spectacle and wonder how many of those marchers marched during Vietnam. I wonder if any spectators play a version of “I Spy” where participants attempt to identify as many furries and inflatable characters as they can.
Perhaps, Mr. Nagler, you’re confusing treasonous Biden and Obama with Trump, as those two were much more of a threat to democracy than President Trump ever will be. Meanwhile, Trump, the greatest president of our lifetimes, twice, continues to Make America Great Again, Again. ICE enforcement continues to ramp up. Another drug boat was smoked. Criminals crossing our southern border are virtually nonexistent. Those who manufactured crimes against Trump are being prosecuted. And the list goes on. BTW, in addition to the Declaration of Independence, we have the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps you can refresh Democrats on sections related to invaders to our country and ask why Democrats are so willing to put the welfare of invaders ahead of the American people. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.