A crowded race to replace U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo in Congress has formed with 11 candidates all vying for the same seat to represent much of the southern and coastal portions of the Peninsula. 

In the race to represent District 16 — a district encompassing the southern and coastal portions of San Mateo County and northern Santa Clara County — are Peter Ohtaki, a Republican financial emergency manager from Menlo Park; Peter Dixon, a Democrat technology entrepreneur, veteran and father living in Portola Valley; Democrat tech executive Rishi Kumar; Joby Bernstein, a Stanford University Masters of Business student and Democrat; Republican Karl Ryan; Joe Simitian, a Santa Clara County supervisor and Democrat; former San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat; tech policy expert Ahmed Mostafa; Democrat state Assemblymember Evan Low; Palo Alto Councilmember Greg Tanaka, a Democrat; and Julie Lythcott-Haims, an author, activist, speaker, educator and Palo Alto councilmember. 

Recommended for you

(650) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(5) comments

PeninsulaLawAndOrder

Pathetic.

*Fentanyl is coming through our (non) border

*Concerned about San Francisco, our neighbor? Fentanyl combined with a porous border and pro criminal laws

*All polling companies including all leftie MSM, PBS, Harvard/Harris, AP/Norc confirm immigration by way of illegally crossing is a major concern even for dem voters

*Those criminal "migrants" beating the NYPD cops (watch the footage) and being released by Woke Inc has caused both dems and repubs to speak out

And this group, at least by reading this article, is tip toeing and bringing up the Bush era non-solution of "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"

acomo

I agree...immigration reform is needed. So why would the bi-partisan Senate bill fail to proceed? Publications such as the WSJ editorial board (hardly a bastion of a liberal stance) concurred that it was one of the most comprehensive bills written in decades. Maybe there really isn't a "crisis"?

Dirk van Ulden

FFGig - comprehensive is not the same thing as popular demand to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. The bill essentially authorized and codified the status quo, no limits on illegal crossings and more power for the ultimate loser, Mayorkas. The bi-partisan reference showed a few rino senators siding with the most liberal senate majority leader ever. They were probably paid something or just forgot what their constituents wanted. Read the text and you know why our DC representatives are completely oblivious to the the will of the voters, save for a number of courageous House members. The WSJ is on the side of big money which loves cheap labor and looks the other way when the criminal gangs on both sides of border are profiting. Latin America news papers allege that several senior legislators are actually complicit in the drug and human trafficking business and would not want a solution that most of us want. Which is: Seal the border and wipe out the cartels.

acomo

Sorry...I didn't realize you were a leading authority on immigration reform. My bad.

Terence Y

FFGig, I think most, perhaps all, of us would take Mr. van Ulden’s thoughts and authority on immigration reform and most everything else over your thoughts and commentary. So I’d agree, it is your bad.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here