EZ Lube settles claims of allegedly defrauding customers
SANTA ANA — Santa Ana-based EZ Lube Inc. has agreed to pay $5 million to settle allegations that it charged customers for unnecessary or unfinished repairs.
The settlement stems from a 2004 investigation by the state’s consumer agency that investigates complaints against automobile repair shops.
The state is placing the company, which operates about 80 shops in Southern California, on probation for five years. The state also ordered the company to suspend services other than oil and filter changes and chassis lubrications at many of its shops. Skip Miller, an attorney for EZ Lube, says the company reached a settlement to avoid civil litigation and says no fraud occurred.
EZ Lube also agreed to install surveillance cameras so motorists can watch their vehicles being serviced.
Judge orders
Qualcomm to stop selling chips that infringe Broadcom
SANTA ANA — A federal judge on Monday ordered wireless giant Qualcomm to stop selling data chips that infringe on patents belonging to its smaller rival Broadcom.
U.S. District Judge James Selna issued the ruling, the latest in a series of legal victories Broadcom scored over Qualcomm this year over the rights to technology for cell phones. The three patented chips use WCDMA technology, a small but fast-growing part of the wireless market used mostly in American T-Mobile and AT&T phones.
Selna ruled that Qualcomm can continue to sell other disputed chips in the United States until January 2009, but must pay royalties on those chips, which use a different technology called EVDO and are used on Verizon and Sprint networks in America. He also allowed Qualcomm to use a patented Broadcom walkie-talkie technology until January 2009.
Recommended for you
Broadcom representatives were happy with the New Year’s Eve ruling despite what appeared to be a split decision that stemmed from a lawsuit filed in 2005.
"The ruling is very close to what we asked for,” said David Rosmann, Broadcom’s vice president for intellectual-property litigation.
A Qualcomm spokeswoman said the company was reviewing the ruling and declined further comment.
Qualcomm, based in San Diego, is the world’s second-largest chip supplier for mobile phones after Texas Instruments Inc. It earns much of its money from licensing fees on its patented technology.
Broadcom, based in Irvine, is a newcomer to the cell phone business but gained ground in 2007 in a wide-ranging court battle with Qualcomm.
In May 2007, a jury awarded Broadcom $19.6 million in damages for the same chip patents. In November, Selna indicated he would up the award to $39.3 million, but reversed himself when a a federal appellate court raised the bar for proving willful patent infringement.
The judge then took up the question of whether future sales of the chips should be stopped, resulting in Monday’s order.
Qualcomm shares fell 22 cents, or 0.56 percent, to $39.35 in Nasdaq trading on Monday. Shares fell 5 cents after hours.
Shares of Broadcom fell 7 cents, or 0.27 percent, to close at $26.14 on the Nasdaq. They rose 28 cents after hours.

(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.