Editor,
What is the connection between the queen of the Britons passing and climate change? Well the coverage of the former and the lack of coverage of perhaps the biggest example of catastrophe due to human augmented climate change is what.
Editor,
What is the connection between the queen of the Britons passing and climate change? Well the coverage of the former and the lack of coverage of perhaps the biggest example of catastrophe due to human augmented climate change is what.
I learned a great deal about the queen’s subtle ability to register her feelings that might have gone counter to the prevailing political sentiment in her nation, such as her visit to the previous British colony that became Jordan she failed to visit the nation state of Israel due to her feelings about how that new nation was treating the Palestinian population.
Also, her very public meeting with Nelson Mandela while her prime minister Margaret Thatcher and U.S. President Reagan were trying to avoid the world’s sanctioning of South Africa over the treatment of its native population as well.
In spite of all that interesting history, I feel the media’s minuscule apportionment of screen time to the stupendous happenings of the effects of the mega flood on the Pakistani nation a population that also was once part of the old British empire really needed more attention. The climate experts see the sudden and increasing melting of the ice packs in the Himalayas and the super heavy rains that coincided with that had the effect of submerging a third of that nation resulting in at least 2 thousand deaths. Wouldn’t you think it might have deserved at least equal billing?
PS: I see the Sept. 13 Daily Journal proves an exception as it has the Pakistan flood on the front page. Bravo!
Mike Caggiano
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(5) comments
Perhaps, Mr. Caggiano, it’s because the queen of the Britons passing is a non-debatable event which everyone can agree, whereas “human augmented climate change” is a man-made construct which is completely debatable and not everyone will ever agree. There’s a reason they call them “natural” disasters and as such, they’re an accepted part of life, as they have been for billions of years.
Terrence even if we call it an 'act of god' it's still like having the US under water from the East coast to Ohio. Newsworthy? wadayathink?
Miike, there’s just as much, if not more of, a chance that uplift will raise the Appalachian range higher than the top of Mount Shasta. But instead of focusing on issues that might take place millennia from now, why don’t we focus on past predictions and whether they’ve come true. I’ll start… Wasn’t it in 1989 when the UN said entire nations would be wiped off the face of the Earth by 2000 by global warming? Wasn’t it in 1995 that the NYT predicted that in 25 years, the east coast would no longer be visible because they were underwater? Wasn’t it in 2004 that the DoD said climate change would destroy us by 2020? Wasn’t it in in 2006 that Al Gore predicted the Earth would reach a point of no return in 10 years? And then in 2008 that Al Gore predicted the north polar ice cap would be ice-free in five years (then he moved it to 2014, then crickets?)?
So let’s recap. How many of the above predictions (don't worry, there are plenty more) have come true? Zero, zilch, nada, squat, goose egg, zip, because here we are, in 2022 with our cities, the east coast, our nation, the polar ice cap in existence, looking not much worse for the wear. Newsworthy? Wadayathink? Seems reporting on the results of all those, and more, failed predictions are also getting less ink than the queen of the Britons passing.
As usual, TY, you have little grasp of fact. The 1989 UN report said the planet would reach a tipping point. And indeed we are likely well past the tipping point. Human activities have raised the atmosphere's carbon dioxide content by 50% in less than 200 years, the planetary buffers are full and climate change will continue to accelerate. The only question is, how fast will it accelerate--will we slow down our carbon dioxide output in time to avoid complete destruction? Humans are smart, but not collectively very sane, so I'm thinking not.
Westy, for arguments sake, let’s assume I accept your personal definition of “tipping point.” Even though three million years ago, when temperatures and CO2 levels were higher and there were no humans driving cars, no plastic, no air conditioning, and no aerosols, we still didn’t “tip over.” I'll be happy to give you that one as a freebie but you still haven’t addressed the other failed predictions I’ve listed. In fact, I can easily subtract your one freebie and add a few more failed predictions if you’d like – there are plenty to choose from.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.