Editor,
Due to the implementation of district elections for the board of the San Mateo County Community College District, Maurice Goodman is forced to fight for his seat against another incumbent.
Editor,
Due to the implementation of district elections for the board of the San Mateo County Community College District, Maurice Goodman is forced to fight for his seat against another incumbent.
Trustee Goodman has a proven record of leadership for all students — especially those whom our institutions often tend to neglect. He is a powerful voice for educational equity and diversity. Professionally, Mr. Goodman runs a highly successful nonprofit mentoring underprivileged youth. He also sits on the boards of several nonprofit organizations and educational institutions.
As a graduate of the district, Goodman knows the kinds of opportunities that community colleges are capable of providing. Mr. Goodman has devoted his career to realizing that potential.
Dave Mandelkern, who also sits on the board and Mr. Goodman’s challenger for his seat, has been on the board for nearly two decades. Mandelkern is a Silicon Valley corporate alum, not an educator or a mentor. He lacks Mr. Goodman’s focus on justice, drive for equality of opportunity and his connection to the community. He also lacks Mr. Goodman’s broad base of outspoken student supporters: student organizations and individuals across the SMCCCD’s campuses have become vocal proponents of his re-election.
It is time to lead with a focus on students and this is why I am supporting Maurice Goodman for re-election.
Alexis Lewis
San Mateo
The letter writer is an
executive board member
of the NAACP San Mateo branch.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Having spoken my mind on comments concerning Mr. Mandelkern's candidacy, it is only fair to give equal time to Mr. Goodman. Unfortunately, speaking out about the only Black candidate, someone supported by the local leader of the NAACP, no doubt will earn me condemnation not for the facts I present, but for the audacity to question others' opinions as race can be more salient than data.
Mr. Goodman was the President of the SMCCCD Board in 2019. He negotiated and signed, on behalf of the residence of San Mateo County, the quid pro quo contract that gave Ron Galatolo the golden parachute for $1.2 million plus full benefits when he swapped jobs from Chancellor to Chancellor Emeritus. Mr. Goodman and the Board then put Mr. Galatolo on paid administrative leave, an act that condemned Mr. Galatolo in the press before a trial, but never explained to the public the reason for such action.
When I made a public comment at the Fall 2019 Board retreat summarizing all the problematic news stories about the former chancellor and asked for an explanation for the new outrageous contract as Chancellor Emeritus, Mr. Goodman cut me off; I insisted on continuing given free speech in a public government forum. The Board sat mum after I laid out the data and did not address my concerns (they will claim that the Brown Act prevents them from responding, but that is not true; the Act only prevents them from taking action on an item not agendized).
As an educational researcher, I wrote to the Board numerous times presenting data on student achievement, inequity, and disproportionate impact to try to get their attention to the poor outcomes of the student body, especially Black and Hispanic students. While only 22% of White students graduate on time, the numbers are worse for Blacks (17%) and Hispanics (15%). Recently, I published a Letter to the Editor on Black Lives Matter (https://www.smdailyjournal.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/black-lives-matter/article_7fd2cff4-012d-11eb-bbca-f38b8acbdee2.html ). Cañada College has a 21.3% difference in course success rates of Asian versus Black students (81.6% vs. 60.3% respectively). Similarly, there is a 17.5% disparity between White students and their Black classmates (Cañada College Data Dashboard). I forwarded this to the Board. No response.
The citizens of San Mateo county contribute $168 million in property taxes toward the SMCCCD budget. Are you proud that four-out-of-five students don't graduate on time; even less so for minoritized students? Â While many Trustees claim ownership of a "powerful voice for educational equity and diversity," none, according to the data, put your money where their mouth is.
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College District. mreiner32205@gmail.com  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-b-reiner-phd-14057551/
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.