Thank you, Herb Perez, for his guest perspective “Why Foster City’s children need e-bike education now,” shining a light on safety for kids who rely on e-bikes to get around. E-bikes are an important transportation innovation that increase adolescent independence while reducing auto congestion and air pollution in our neighborhoods.
Unfortunately, the focus on education ignores the root cause of rising traffic violence — our streets are not safe for those who walk and bike. Auto-related deaths have long been the No. 1 cause of death for American kids and adolescents (although recently surpassed by gun violence) — even before e-bikes. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, education programs have demonstrated little success in reducing crashes. Separation of cars and kids on bikes (protected bike lanes) and reducing vehicle speeds (road diets) are the most effective countermeasures. Let’s focus our time and money on programs that have been proven effective.
Furthermore, we need to stop scapegoating e-bikes (and their riders), especially those who follow the rules. Mr. Perez mentions the recent crash in which an SUV driver killed 4-year-old Ayden Fang on a sidewalk. According to Burlingame Police Department, the e-bike riders were driving legally when the teen SUV driver failed to yield to them before driving onto the far sidewalk. This tragic crash had nothing to do with e-bikes. As with most crashes, street design (visibility) and driver error (failure to yield) likely contributed to the crash.
We need an “all-of-the-above” strategy, but let’s be smart about it.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Swire, but if a focus on e-bike education is not a focus, how does one learn the rules of the road? And does that non-focus apply to drivers, also? You cherry pick an example of an accident where the driver is allegedly at fault. What about other accidents? You say, “As with most crashes, street design (visibility) and driver error (failure to yield) likely contributed to the crash.” Where’s the data to support your assertion? You say our streets are not safe for those who walk and bike? Not true, I’d say just about all streets are safe for those who walk and bike. Where’s the data? Exactly. Let’s obtain data to make informed choices. Perhaps we should track the number of cyclists, regular and e-bikes, on roads; who is at fault during vehicle/bike collisions; the age of vehicle drivers/bike riders; floating a cyclist tax to pay for bicycle infrastructure, etc.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Swire, but if a focus on e-bike education is not a focus, how does one learn the rules of the road? And does that non-focus apply to drivers, also? You cherry pick an example of an accident where the driver is allegedly at fault. What about other accidents? You say, “As with most crashes, street design (visibility) and driver error (failure to yield) likely contributed to the crash.” Where’s the data to support your assertion? You say our streets are not safe for those who walk and bike? Not true, I’d say just about all streets are safe for those who walk and bike. Where’s the data? Exactly. Let’s obtain data to make informed choices. Perhaps we should track the number of cyclists, regular and e-bikes, on roads; who is at fault during vehicle/bike collisions; the age of vehicle drivers/bike riders; floating a cyclist tax to pay for bicycle infrastructure, etc.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.