Editor,
Your article about the prior week’s temporary rejection of state Senate Bill 50 (SB 50) incorrectly claims the bill was “intended to streamline dense development near public transportation lines” and that development would consist of “apartments” (“Same fate but hope for SB 50” in the Feb. 5 edition of the Daily Journal). In fact, SB 50 is about encouraging developers to build higher-density ownership or rental housing in single-family neighborhoods in much of metropolitan California — including every county touching the San Francisco Bay — and its successor bill will do the same.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.