Are there any overriding authorities to scrutinize the decisions made by individual municipalities to review the relevant environmental impact studies that seem to focus only on local plans? The MTC, of which I am not a fan, seems to be in a reactive mode and will just penalize those who have no choice but to use the roads.
Yet, cities including Millbrae, San Mateo, San Carlos and Redwood City proudly announce new massive developments with resulting high-tech workers but omit to consider adequate housing or feasible transportation for these workers. Is anyone in our bloated, distributed government structure connecting the dots?
Where is the Association of Bay Area Governments? Our critical housing shortage is caused by well-paid biotech and high-tech employees, thereby driving out folks in the service segment. The latter are conveniently brandished as underrepresented and, if lucky, are mollified with promises of affordable housing. From my perspective as a 40-year plus San Mateo County resident, our respective and collective governance is either callous or totally ignorant. They waste their time on political diversion such as reach codes, sea-level rise, climate change and equity but are unable or unwilling to address the real issues and carefully avoid third-rail problems that face us.
Thanks for your LTE. Additional traffic fees? No problem. A 3.3 million square foot office/life science development proposal for Redwood City includes thousands of new parking spaces. Most of those workers on such a campus will be able to afford new tolls. Remember, the parking is "free."
You make a good point about the "folks in the service segment"... it's not likely they will be able to afford housing close to the projects in the cities you mentioned, and with low wages being paid for their services, it will be increasingly difficult for those workers to keep up with new traffic tolls and fees.
Well written, Mr. van Ulden. The sad fact is that their “political diversion” as you’ve described only works to increase the costs associated with housing, while doing little, if anything to affect global warming or emissions. Bay Area, you get the government you voted for.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Good morning, Dirk
Thanks for your LTE. Additional traffic fees? No problem. A 3.3 million square foot office/life science development proposal for Redwood City includes thousands of new parking spaces. Most of those workers on such a campus will be able to afford new tolls. Remember, the parking is "free."
You make a good point about the "folks in the service segment"... it's not likely they will be able to afford housing close to the projects in the cities you mentioned, and with low wages being paid for their services, it will be increasingly difficult for those workers to keep up with new traffic tolls and fees.
Well written, Mr. van Ulden. The sad fact is that their “political diversion” as you’ve described only works to increase the costs associated with housing, while doing little, if anything to affect global warming or emissions. Bay Area, you get the government you voted for.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.