I wish for the peace and calm the San Mateo noise regulations promise: The … purpose of the provisions of this chapter are to protect the inhabitants of the City against all forms of nuisances … which are injurious to health, or [that] interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life … by the entire community.
Our community is neglecting these regulations.
Gas leaf blower noise violates the noise regulations. Let us use conservative figures to prove it. The regulations state noise may not exceed 70 decibels in residential areas for a cumulative period of five minutes in any hour in residential areas. Gas yard tool manufacturers generally rate their gas tools at 74 decibels and above. Worse, gas leaf blowers emit low frequency noise that travels up to two football fields from its source. It also penetrates windows and doors, making it virtually inescapable and defeating the purpose of the noise regulations.
Having shown gas leaf blowers’ unlawfulness, let us turn to the excuses for inaction.
First, critics will say the noise ordinance is impractical to enforce because the police are too busy. I point out that there are 15 offices, such as code enforcement officer, that have noise regulation citation authority. Critics then move the goal posts. It’s impossible to enforce because, they say, landscapers would be gone by the time an enforcement officer would arrive. I say a modest modification of the city code relieves this problem: citizen affidavits. A citizen reports the violation, and the officer simply sends a citation to the property owner.
What is the critics’ excuse now?
Landscapers would be put out of business, critics say, because electric tools aren’t practical. In place of their fantasy, I point out reality. Electric tools are not only practical, but also better than gas tools. Electric tools are powerful: blowing air up to 190 MPH. Electric tools are also much cheaper to operate than gas tools. Gas tool fuel costs are $2.22/hour, electric only 7 cents/hour: 30 times less. There are obvious benefits to both businesses and consumers.
If landscapers can carry gas with them, they can carry batteries with them. They can learn to work efficiently and care for their new tools. There is low cost support for that, such as the American Green Zone Alliance.
Recommended for you
Before critics ride this excuse into the ground, they could read the official magazine of the National Association of Landscape Professionals: The Edge. The January/February 2022 celebrates sustainability, including battery-powered tools. That issue was published over a year ago, and battery-powered tool technology continues to advance.
Now, critics begin grasping at straws. “What about battery waste,” they ask, “and the power grid?” I agree batteries are an imperfect alternative, but critics do not level the same attack on batteries in everything from ear buds to electric cars. That’s inconsistent.
Critics then move on to a particularly lazy excuse. They say if electric tools work, then there is a “transition” underway, and no action is needed. First, they wouldn’t act because electric tools don’t work. Now, they won’t act because electric tools do work. Perhaps these critics would suggest we do nothing to fight a raging wildfire. With unassailable logic, they say the fire will eventually burn itself out.
While we fiddle, the planet burns. Operating a gas leaf blower emits the same amount of emissions as driving a car 1,100 miles. In addition, gas tool emissions contain known carcinogens, such as benzine. We require carbon monoxide detectors in all homes, yet, we ignore the same chemical when it comes from gas leaf blowers.
Landscapers take the brunt of our indifference. They are burdened by expensive tools. They are most exposed to the tools’ emissions and hearing-destroying noise. They face dirty looks, and worse, furious and frustrated neighbors. All of that is within our power to change.
I argue for noise regulations enforcement, but we could do much better. All gas yard tools emit the same toxic chemicals that worsen global warming. For small businesses, it is most economical to replace gas tools with a complete suite of electric tools. A complete gas yard tool ban is most sensible and practical. In any case, we should not willfully ignore ordinances designed to protect the community.
Let’s move on from dirty, destructive, expensive gas yard tools. Imagine the more peaceful and prosperous community we could have. Imagine being a leading community in equity, global warming action, and small business support. If we enforce the noise regulations, the entire community wins.
Dustin Chase is a climate, noise and equality activist. He lives in San Mateo.
Dustin - you are preaching to the choir. I don't think there is anyone who disagrees with you. I wished Belmont would adopt the same standard. With respect to cost, I have seen gardeners move up from beat up small pick up trucks to shiny monster vehicles so the economics seem to in their favor already.
Yes!! Not only is this better for our collective ears, but leaving some of that ‘yard waste’ behind, feeds the soil, creating habitat for all the good little creatures and helps plants grow and thrive.
So a citizen reports a violation and an officer “simply” sends a citation to the property owner? So now folks are guilty until proven innocent? How does the complainant know the sound level exceeds 70 decibels, and for a cumulative 5 minutes? Does the complainant have a calibrated sound meter and stopwatch? If I have neighbors with dogs experiencing abandonment issues, or I’m tired of hearing dogs barking, or kids are too loud, can I file as many citizen affidavits I want? After all, no proof is necessary to find them guilty…
Electric blowers are powerful, but to be as powerful as gas blowers, they need much more energy (preferably in the form of CFM, not MPH), requiring more frequent changes of expensive batteries. For landscapers, time is money, and how much money do they need to spend to have multiple sets of charged batteries on hand? The price quickly rises. As for critics not leveling the same attack on batteries from electric cars, you may not be reading other letters and commentary. It’s the folks who own and push for electric cars/solar panels that are afraid to answer questions on the environmental impact of mining precious metals to produce batteries/panels, as well as the hazardous waste when batteries/panels have gone through their useful life. Let’s also conveniently forget that most of the electricity to power electric cars comes from fossil-fuel generation plants.
As for fiddling while the planet burns, you should stop the music from China, India, other undeveloped countries, and even developed countries – they’ll continue to “burn” the planet much more than all the emissions from gas-generated leaf blowers, combined. Let’s not pretend getting rid of gas yard tools will make a whit of difference in global warming. It’s just more virtue signaling.
huh? Electricity does NOT cost 7 cents per kWh. If you look at your PG&E bill and include the distribution charge, it is closer to 50 cents per kWh. A gallon of gasoline had 33.7kWh of energy in it and costs $5.00 meaning 14.8 cents/kWh if 100% efficiently burned (which it isn't). Assume the gas leaf blower operates at 20% efficiency, this would be an equivalent 74 cents per kWh (of actual delivered leaf blowing energy). I'm not aware of what the conversion efficiency for an electric leaf blower is (It isn't 100%). But, if you look at the electricity cost at 50 cents per kWh and derate it by the actual efficiency it gets, it is would appear to be close to on par with the gasoline cost once the gas operated version's efficiency is taken into account and compared to electric leaf blower's conversion efficiency (80%? 90?). (Please double check your electricity distribution cost ... it is a LOT higher than 7 cents per kWh).
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
Dustin - you are preaching to the choir. I don't think there is anyone who disagrees with you. I wished Belmont would adopt the same standard. With respect to cost, I have seen gardeners move up from beat up small pick up trucks to shiny monster vehicles so the economics seem to in their favor already.
What happened to rakes and dust pans??
Yes!! Not only is this better for our collective ears, but leaving some of that ‘yard waste’ behind, feeds the soil, creating habitat for all the good little creatures and helps plants grow and thrive.
So a citizen reports a violation and an officer “simply” sends a citation to the property owner? So now folks are guilty until proven innocent? How does the complainant know the sound level exceeds 70 decibels, and for a cumulative 5 minutes? Does the complainant have a calibrated sound meter and stopwatch? If I have neighbors with dogs experiencing abandonment issues, or I’m tired of hearing dogs barking, or kids are too loud, can I file as many citizen affidavits I want? After all, no proof is necessary to find them guilty…
Electric blowers are powerful, but to be as powerful as gas blowers, they need much more energy (preferably in the form of CFM, not MPH), requiring more frequent changes of expensive batteries. For landscapers, time is money, and how much money do they need to spend to have multiple sets of charged batteries on hand? The price quickly rises. As for critics not leveling the same attack on batteries from electric cars, you may not be reading other letters and commentary. It’s the folks who own and push for electric cars/solar panels that are afraid to answer questions on the environmental impact of mining precious metals to produce batteries/panels, as well as the hazardous waste when batteries/panels have gone through their useful life. Let’s also conveniently forget that most of the electricity to power electric cars comes from fossil-fuel generation plants.
As for fiddling while the planet burns, you should stop the music from China, India, other undeveloped countries, and even developed countries – they’ll continue to “burn” the planet much more than all the emissions from gas-generated leaf blowers, combined. Let’s not pretend getting rid of gas yard tools will make a whit of difference in global warming. It’s just more virtue signaling.
huh? Electricity does NOT cost 7 cents per kWh. If you look at your PG&E bill and include the distribution charge, it is closer to 50 cents per kWh. A gallon of gasoline had 33.7kWh of energy in it and costs $5.00 meaning 14.8 cents/kWh if 100% efficiently burned (which it isn't). Assume the gas leaf blower operates at 20% efficiency, this would be an equivalent 74 cents per kWh (of actual delivered leaf blowing energy). I'm not aware of what the conversion efficiency for an electric leaf blower is (It isn't 100%). But, if you look at the electricity cost at 50 cents per kWh and derate it by the actual efficiency it gets, it is would appear to be close to on par with the gasoline cost once the gas operated version's efficiency is taken into account and compared to electric leaf blower's conversion efficiency (80%? 90?). (Please double check your electricity distribution cost ... it is a LOT higher than 7 cents per kWh).
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.