In the 1600s, the early American colonists sailed across the ocean with very few books. Who had the room? With the many passengers onboard, and livestock and seeds and tools and other essentials, books were often left behind. If there were any books at all, the Bible usually topped the list.
Later, as people became more settled, books started to arrive by the crateful on the docks of the Atlantic coast — at places like Boston or Charleston. There, they often were inspected by local ministers or priests or representatives sent by the governor, and if they were considered blasphemous or too politically dangerous they never made it into the hands of their owners. They could be burned on the spot.
But because human beings have a hunger for stories and knowledge, the books kept coming, seemingly beyond the control of these dockside censors.
Eventually, Benjamin Franklin, in 1731 — years before he helped write the Declaration of Independence — established the first public library in Philadelphia. I’m sure Franklin understood that democracy is based on an informed and educated citizenry, and that books were essential to a person’s education and the ongoing progress of the country.
Recently, though, I’ve been thinking a lot about those early colonial censors, as book bannings have surged in America, to the highest levels since the American Library Association started to track book challenges decades ago.
The books are often about Black culture, or the gay community, or the Holocaust, and citizens crowding into high school board meetings or complaining at their local public libraries in Tennessee or Texas or Florida, intent on getting certain books off the shelves and out of the curriculum, have become ubiquitous news topics.
When I was having a conversation with a close friend recently about this, he dismissed these acts of censorship by saying, “But it’s Texas, what do you expect?”
“What about ‘To Kill A Mockingbird’?” I replied.
“What about it?” he said. “That’s one of my favorite books.”
He didn’t answer when I mentioned that just last year California’s Burbank School District removed the novel from its required reading list.
Here’s my quandary: It doesn’t matter whether it’s in Texas or Wyoming or New York, any more than in Burlingame, if a book is censored, a book is censored.
Recommended for you
If there’s a crack in the foundation of our house, even if it’s beneath a room that’s seldom visited, over time that crack might certainly spread and suddenly, to our amazement, appear beneath the place where we sleep.
The freedom this country affords us means very little if a reader of books cannot pursue those ideas other people might find disturbing. Of course, many find such freedoms — the freedom to read, the freedom to choose, the freedom to share their ideas — dangerous, and that’s why autocrats so often quash them.
But as the writer Barbara Kingsolver has said: “If there’s a fatal notion on this earth, it’s the notion that wider horizons will be fatal.”
When I was in the seventh grade my mother gave me a book to read that she thought I’d like, “The Catcher in the Rye,” which, for years, was the most censored book in American high schools and libraries.
I don’t think I’ve read it again in 50 years, but at the time, I believed it was the first book that I’d ever read. Of course, I’d read other books, but this was the first one that read me, rather than the other way around. The words on the page — in a teenage boy’s irreverent language, who thought he had things pegged, who spoke with a sharp-eyed attitude deeply attuned to all he considered false in the adult world he was attempting to cope with — were vividly alive and talked to me. I got lost in that book, and getting lost, found myself.
Page by page, the novel nested in my imagination, until it took wing, like a bird in flight.
And when you’re hesitantly growing into yourself, when you might feel marginalized in one way or another and alone, discovering a book that speaks to the way you feel can be a life-affirming moment. It sets us upon the path of independence, of self-reliance.
I’m not the only reader who’s had an experience like this.
When I finished the book I gave it to my best friend to read. He dropped it into my hands the next day, because after showing it to his mother, she said, “You’re not reading that!” and told him that if he didn’t return it, she would.
I can still recall walking home from school that day, book in hand, and, for the first time, a knowledge about something formed in my mind. Censorship was not a word I had ever used in my life, but as I held tightly onto my book — this companion that introduced me to myself — I knew that this particular lesson of my own freedom would certainly be worth remembering.
Mike Nagler is a member of the Burlingame Library Board of Trustees.
Thanks for taking the time and putting pen to paper... even when we disagree, it's important that we express our ideas in a clear and cogent fashion.
I'm just wondering... when it comes to school reading material... especially for young children... do you believe "age appropriateness" should be considered when school librarians order books for their libraries?
So, a school district in Burbank pulled "To Kill a Mockingbird" off its required reading list. Was the novel still on district library shelves? I'm guessing the language offended some people... and I understand why. Maybe that's why it came off the required reading list. That's not quite the same thing as banning a book. Do you know if Lee's book was removed from the district?
I read in Gerald Haslam's, "The Other California," about his experiences as a kid growing up in the Central Valley. He wrote that even in 1950s, a kid had to get a note from his parents to check out "The Grapes of Wrath" from the public library. The book was not banned but access was restricted. Do you feel parents should have a say in what reading materials are made available to their minor children?
Thanks for sharing your personal story about how "The Catcher in the Rye" profoundly affected you as an adolescent. I also read it as a lad and was struck with Holden's bold recounting of his adventures. We have that in common.
Thanks for weighing in, Ray. Yes, age appropriateness is certainly a consideration when choosing books and librarians, teachers, parents, bookstore owners (like me), school boards, district staff, statewide school officials, etc.... do that all the time. Stop by our shop one day and check out one of the most banned children's picture books of the last 15 years, "And Tango Makes Three." It is a sweet TRUE story about two male penguins who adopt an abandoned egg and hatch it and live as a family afterwards. But let's step away from the gender thing and go to a book that I suspect you'd agree SHOULD be on bookshelves for children and is COMPLETELY age appropriate. "Charlotte's Web" was banned in a Kansas school district in 2006 because "talking animals are considered an insult to God." Winnie the Pooh was also banned in Kansas years earlier for the same reason.
I agree that "age appropriateness" should be determined via a collaborative effort, but what role do you see parents playing in that process? We touched on parent responsibility during our dialog re: bullying. In my view, parents are and remain the most important advocates for their children. Again, what role do you see for parents in the process?
Question... were "Charlotte's Web" and "Winnie the Pooh" banned throughout the entire state of Kansas or just a select school district? Follow up question... is either book currently banned anywhere in Kansas? . .
I believe parents should be as involved as they'd like to be with their children's schooling. Seeing what books kids bring home, looking at textbooks, talking with their kids about what they're learning, all good! And, if a parent finds something objectionable, being able to have a civil discussion with a teacher, librarian, administrator or librarian to raise those objections is key to us having a healthy society. I LOVE it when parents come into our shop, tell us about their kids' interests, what books they've enjoyed, and we get to help them choose new books to keep that love of reading going. We do our best to truly know each book we recommend and given our small size we're very picky about what goes on our shelves.
Best of my knowledge, the one school district that banned Charlotte's Web seems to have gotten over itself.
Thank you. I love the quote, attributed to George RR Martin, "A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one." I would add that your experience finding a part of yourself in "Catcher in the Rye" shows the importance of having access to all kinds of books, media, plays, etc... so that we can stumble upon someone and say "Hey! That's me!!" School librarians, teachers, public librarians, school boards, and of course parents can and should choose age-appropriate books and other media for children and do so all across our country every day. Vague and ridiculous rules that say children shouldn't have access to material that might make them "feel bad" or "feel guilty" for past misdeeds of others or touch on "gender" or "sexual orientation" are harmful and wrong. I know that in the long run such rules/laws will be found unconstitutional but in the meantime we have to fight against censorship. And yes, we are the United States of America so what happens in Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, matters to us here. Let's do all that we can to ensure that our children live thousands of lives through a stunning diversity of books, standing at the ready to talk about those books with them, grow with them, express our thoughts about them, put them into context, and not allow books to be censored by hysteria and political grandstanding. To my San Mateo neighbors, if you'd like to see some of the books being banned in Florida and Texas for yourselves, especially the children's picture books, stop by our store. We have most of them on our shelves.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(7) comments
Good morning, Mike
Thanks for taking the time and putting pen to paper... even when we disagree, it's important that we express our ideas in a clear and cogent fashion.
I'm just wondering... when it comes to school reading material... especially for young children... do you believe "age appropriateness" should be considered when school librarians order books for their libraries?
So, a school district in Burbank pulled "To Kill a Mockingbird" off its required reading list. Was the novel still on district library shelves? I'm guessing the language offended some people... and I understand why. Maybe that's why it came off the required reading list. That's not quite the same thing as banning a book. Do you know if Lee's book was removed from the district?
I read in Gerald Haslam's, "The Other California," about his experiences as a kid growing up in the Central Valley. He wrote that even in 1950s, a kid had to get a note from his parents to check out "The Grapes of Wrath" from the public library. The book was not banned but access was restricted. Do you feel parents should have a say in what reading materials are made available to their minor children?
Thanks for sharing your personal story about how "The Catcher in the Rye" profoundly affected you as an adolescent. I also read it as a lad and was struck with Holden's bold recounting of his adventures. We have that in common.
Thanks for weighing in, Ray. Yes, age appropriateness is certainly a consideration when choosing books and librarians, teachers, parents, bookstore owners (like me), school boards, district staff, statewide school officials, etc.... do that all the time. Stop by our shop one day and check out one of the most banned children's picture books of the last 15 years, "And Tango Makes Three." It is a sweet TRUE story about two male penguins who adopt an abandoned egg and hatch it and live as a family afterwards. But let's step away from the gender thing and go to a book that I suspect you'd agree SHOULD be on bookshelves for children and is COMPLETELY age appropriate. "Charlotte's Web" was banned in a Kansas school district in 2006 because "talking animals are considered an insult to God." Winnie the Pooh was also banned in Kansas years earlier for the same reason.
Hello (again), Craig
I agree that "age appropriateness" should be determined via a collaborative effort, but what role do you see parents playing in that process? We touched on parent responsibility during our dialog re: bullying. In my view, parents are and remain the most important advocates for their children. Again, what role do you see for parents in the process?
Question... were "Charlotte's Web" and "Winnie the Pooh" banned throughout the entire state of Kansas or just a select school district? Follow up question... is either book currently banned anywhere in Kansas? . .
Hello (Again) Ray!
I believe parents should be as involved as they'd like to be with their children's schooling. Seeing what books kids bring home, looking at textbooks, talking with their kids about what they're learning, all good! And, if a parent finds something objectionable, being able to have a civil discussion with a teacher, librarian, administrator or librarian to raise those objections is key to us having a healthy society. I LOVE it when parents come into our shop, tell us about their kids' interests, what books they've enjoyed, and we get to help them choose new books to keep that love of reading going. We do our best to truly know each book we recommend and given our small size we're very picky about what goes on our shelves.
Best of my knowledge, the one school district that banned Charlotte's Web seems to have gotten over itself.
Thank you. I love the quote, attributed to George RR Martin, "A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one." I would add that your experience finding a part of yourself in "Catcher in the Rye" shows the importance of having access to all kinds of books, media, plays, etc... so that we can stumble upon someone and say "Hey! That's me!!" School librarians, teachers, public librarians, school boards, and of course parents can and should choose age-appropriate books and other media for children and do so all across our country every day. Vague and ridiculous rules that say children shouldn't have access to material that might make them "feel bad" or "feel guilty" for past misdeeds of others or touch on "gender" or "sexual orientation" are harmful and wrong. I know that in the long run such rules/laws will be found unconstitutional but in the meantime we have to fight against censorship. And yes, we are the United States of America so what happens in Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, matters to us here. Let's do all that we can to ensure that our children live thousands of lives through a stunning diversity of books, standing at the ready to talk about those books with them, grow with them, express our thoughts about them, put them into context, and not allow books to be censored by hysteria and political grandstanding. To my San Mateo neighbors, if you'd like to see some of the books being banned in Florida and Texas for yourselves, especially the children's picture books, stop by our store. We have most of them on our shelves.
Hello, Craig...
Does your "stunning diversity of books" include diversity of thought?
I'd say yes, specifically in our children's sections.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.