On March 16, 2020, San Mateo County’s Health Officer Dr. Scott Morrow issued a shelter in place order for COVID-19. It came on the heels of a number of other orders, limiting large gatherings, shutting down schools, etc.
While today is the two-year anniversary of the World Health Organization’s pandemic declaration, next week we will meet the two-year anniversary of the local shutdown that shifted the entire way we live our lives. We are now officially in the endemic stage of this disease, and it’s my estimation that the omicron surge ended around Feb. 21 based on case counts, deaths and hospitalizations data I’ve been following closely for the past two years.
It’s been a whirlwind ride, and though many say it’s not over, in a way it is. There could be new variants and new threats and systems are in place to return to some of the mandates we experienced. But likely nothing like the confusion, disruption and dramatic change we felt in those early days and weeks.
The zeitgeist seems to indicate that we can no longer accomplish great things. In many respects, this is true. We are a messy, dysfunctional and sometimes plain erratic society with any number of differing opinions on what we could be doing differently or better. There are some who believe COVID wasn’t real, a hoax or overblown. There are others who believe it will never be the same, and our world will always be under threat. Somewhere in the middle is where most of us reside and, you know, honestly, we did a great thing. Together, through tremendous sacrifice and strain, we were able to beat back COVID. Nothing was perfect in how we did it, in retrospect there was obviously much that could have been done better. Everyone can name something we did that made absolutely zero sense. But the people of San Mateo County largely took the issue seriously, did what needed to be done to keep as many people in the community safe, and sacrificed for our neighbors.
We stayed at home. We wore masks. We hand sanitized. We distanced. We learned to be at-home teachers. We even adhered to the silly new rules like no playgrounds, beaches or parks more than 5 miles from our house. We got our temperatures checked all the time. We responded to the same questions over and over again. Yet, we helped each other in new ways. We found new ways of doing things. We Zoomed. We got vaccinated in extremely high numbers. We wore masks again. We got tested. We got boosted. We tested some more.
Recommended for you
Our County Manager Mike Callagy faced the challenges head-on and led through professionalism, creativity and compassion. His team faced long and difficult hours and persisted in tackling any number of difficult issues on the fly. Our County Health department pivoted with distinction and was as transparent as could be while also managing a unique once-in-lifetime (we hope) public health crisis. Government workers, emergency workers, health care workers, retail workers, pharmacists, drivers, teachers, school administrators, elected officials and countless others all rose to the challenge. The Daily Journal team of reporters took on the challenge of becoming instant experts on a previously unknown topic while balancing new coverage with old and also the safety concerns and impact on themselves and their families. And you, the person reading this, rose to the challenge as well. Every single one of us in our own way modified our behavior in difficult ways to take on this issue. And we beat it back so that we can start returning to normal.
What will that normal look like? That’s evolving. Mandates are dropping fast for most settings. As case counts drop dramatically, we are starting to take off our masks and eliminating other precautions. Some are more ready than others and, for the most part, many are keeping those people in mind. For every 10 people still wearing a mask indoors, I guarantee five are doing so for the comfort of others, not for their own well-being. That’s admirable.
In time, as the mandates drop and we become more comfortable with each other, we will see more faces smiling.
We have also lost some members of our community, and they should never be forgotten. We also saved other lives through our shared sacrifice.
This transition time feels hopeful, though, some caution still remains. This is our new reality. But we should be proud we were able to do something great — beat back a pandemic. And we did it together.
Jon Mays is the editor in chief of the Daily Journal. He can be reached at jon@smdailyjournal.com. Follow Jon on Twitter @jonmays.
Mr. Mays – saying “… there was obviously much that could have been done better.” is an understatement. When the government is coercing people to take an experimental jab, when the government imposes an arbitrary 6ft distancing requirement, and when the government shuts down businesses and takes away livelihoods all in the name of masking that does not prevent infection and jabs that do not provide immunity, this only undermines trust in government. In the case of the CDC, the CDC is refusing to publish data on booster shot effectiveness because it may lead to vaccine hesitancy. Reading between the lines – maybe because booster shots are not effective or only effective for a few months? I think we already determined that with real-time results.
When the government refuses to allow potentially life-saving medicines because these medicines are not indicated for COVID, this is downright tragic. What’s the harm - death? These folks are already heading in that direction. And how were some of these decisions made? Just review CDC Director Walensky’s recent talk from St. Louis, where she admits doctors felt the COVID jab was a cure-all and disregarded other treatments. How many are dead because of those doctors who are supposed to do no harm? And Walensky’s admission that she learned that jab juice was effective by watching CNN. Really? Nobody who watches CNN should take anything they say as fact. And we have Walensky blaming jab juice providers with not warning the CDC that their concoctions would be less effective against potential variants. Exactly what kind of Dr. is Dr. Walensky? I’m predicting a review, which is happening now, will show that the CDC has lost even more of their credibility – even among current believers of the CDC. I’m quite sure the CDC has data showing the effectiveness, and the side effects associated with the jab for particular races – red, yellow, black, orange, white, brown, etc. yet I don’t believe this data is available. For instance, if these jabs are more effective among purple people, shouldn’t this data be published, to convince more purple people to be jabbed, knowing potential side effects are lessened for their cohort? Or maybe, this data is not being published because jabs aren’t effective for particular races? BTW, a shout-out to Lou - my comment is back after addressing minor technical difficulties.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
Mr. Mays – saying “… there was obviously much that could have been done better.” is an understatement. When the government is coercing people to take an experimental jab, when the government imposes an arbitrary 6ft distancing requirement, and when the government shuts down businesses and takes away livelihoods all in the name of masking that does not prevent infection and jabs that do not provide immunity, this only undermines trust in government. In the case of the CDC, the CDC is refusing to publish data on booster shot effectiveness because it may lead to vaccine hesitancy. Reading between the lines – maybe because booster shots are not effective or only effective for a few months? I think we already determined that with real-time results.
When the government refuses to allow potentially life-saving medicines because these medicines are not indicated for COVID, this is downright tragic. What’s the harm - death? These folks are already heading in that direction. And how were some of these decisions made? Just review CDC Director Walensky’s recent talk from St. Louis, where she admits doctors felt the COVID jab was a cure-all and disregarded other treatments. How many are dead because of those doctors who are supposed to do no harm? And Walensky’s admission that she learned that jab juice was effective by watching CNN. Really? Nobody who watches CNN should take anything they say as fact. And we have Walensky blaming jab juice providers with not warning the CDC that their concoctions would be less effective against potential variants. Exactly what kind of Dr. is Dr. Walensky? I’m predicting a review, which is happening now, will show that the CDC has lost even more of their credibility – even among current believers of the CDC. I’m quite sure the CDC has data showing the effectiveness, and the side effects associated with the jab for particular races – red, yellow, black, orange, white, brown, etc. yet I don’t believe this data is available. For instance, if these jabs are more effective among purple people, shouldn’t this data be published, to convince more purple people to be jabbed, knowing potential side effects are lessened for their cohort? Or maybe, this data is not being published because jabs aren’t effective for particular races? BTW, a shout-out to Lou - my comment is back after addressing minor technical difficulties.
What happened to Terrence's post? I was looking forward to reading it as he always has something important to say.
"Somewhere in the middle is where most of us reside" indeed
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.