The San Mateo County Parks Department has continued its efforts to create more equitable access to county parks and open spaces, this time by eyeing an elimination of vehicle entrance fees for some of the Peninsula’s most underserved residents.
Nicholas Calderon
“We’re really trying to do whatever we can to encourage people to go to parks,” Parks Department Director Nicholas Calderon said during Thursday’s Parks Commission Meeting.
As proposed, vehicle entrance fees would be waived for county residents who either qualify for County Health’s Access and Care for Everyone plan, a locally funded health care program for low-income earners who don’t qualify for other insurance programs, or CalFresh, the state’s food assistance program.
The measure is part of the department’s efforts to make the parks system more equitable, including through reducing financial and language barriers. In August, the commission voted to end tour fees at the Fitzgerald Marine Reserve in an aim to reduce cost burdens on schools.
In the same month, the department also began standardizing reservation rates across all county parks. Rather than charging $10 when booking over the phone, $7 when booking online and nothing when booking in person, the fee will be $7 across the board, amounting to a revenue loss of about $9,500 per fiscal year.
Vehicle entrance fees at parks drive between $1.1 million and $1.2 million in revenue a year, Calderon said. Under the changes, who Calderon staff believes the department would see little to no dip in revenue while visitorship would likely show strong growth.
But Commissioner Neil Merrilees argued the department could have a greater impact on equity by doing away with parking fees altogether, pushing for the department to “go bigger.”
“I know we would lose money if we do that, but it’s for a good cause and the cause is equity,” Merrilees said.
Rather than present the board with one version of the fee program, Merrilees recommended the commission provide the board with three, one that outlined the costs of ending vehicle entrance fees for everyone at parks and another that showed the cost of ending the fees for only some.
Recommended for you
Merrilees’ request aligns with those made by David Canepa, president of the Board of Supervisors, who also called for all vehicle entrance fees to be ended during a meeting earlier this year.
While other commissioners shared appreciation for Merrilees’’ recommendation and supported the goal, they shied away from fully backing the idea.
Commissioner Heather Green argued that removing the fees for people who could afford to pay would be inequitable “at the pocket level.”
Striking a compromise, Green proposed the commission send the recommendation to the board as presented by Calderon while also including some information on the cost of completely ending vehicle entrance fees. With that information, she argued the board could make a “measured” decision to either push forward the proposed plan, a full ending of the fees or draft a middle ground model.
Similarly, Commissioner Jorge Laguna, who was named commission chair following the discussion, said the board should be informed that the original model was intended to “meet the spirit” of Canepa’s request.
Calderon told commissioners he’s had meetings with officials since beginning to draft the plan but noted the decision on whether and how to change the fees is ultimately up to the board who could “go any which way” after deliberation.
In a 4-1 vote, the commission supported Green’s recommendation. Commissioner Meda Okelo voted against the measure after arguing the county could take a slower, data driven approach to ending vehicle entry fees.
Sounds like discrimination against the majority of other folks. Instead, end fees across the board. If you want, allow folks to make voluntary contributions and they can pay what they feel the experience is worth. While you’re in such a giving mood, you may want to endorse ending, or substantially lowering, taxes and fees for marijuana purchases to allow pot shops to compete better with illegal pot sellers, who I hear, are eating legal pot shops' munchies.
You mean to tell me that if one can afford a car, one cannot afford to pay entrance fees? Who are you kidding? Another equity ripoff. It seems these commissions are stumbling over themselves to discover inequities.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Sounds like discrimination against the majority of other folks. Instead, end fees across the board. If you want, allow folks to make voluntary contributions and they can pay what they feel the experience is worth. While you’re in such a giving mood, you may want to endorse ending, or substantially lowering, taxes and fees for marijuana purchases to allow pot shops to compete better with illegal pot sellers, who I hear, are eating legal pot shops' munchies.
You mean to tell me that if one can afford a car, one cannot afford to pay entrance fees? Who are you kidding? Another equity ripoff. It seems these commissions are stumbling over themselves to discover inequities.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.