Belmont is moving forward with preliminary research on how to protect the Island Park neighborhood from increasing flood risk, which may lead the city to join a larger levee project encompassing Redwood Shores.
Upgrading the Redwood Shores levee has been in the works for awhile, spearheaded by the city of Redwood City, as the current levee is too low for accreditation based on Federal Emergency Management Agency standards. Construction is expected to begin in 2030.
Since the beginning of this year, Belmont officials have been discussing whether to join the levee project to help mitigate flood risk by including levee protection along Belmont Creek, under Belmont’s jurisdiction, and in the Island Parks neighborhood, which would allow the city to leverage existing funding and expertise as part of a larger regional effort.
The City Council approved a $208,000 contract to start early-stage engineering work “to allow Belmont to independently assess the feasibility, benefits and costs of including the Island Park neighborhood in the Regional Project’s levee system, while leveraging technical work already underway by Redwood City,” a staff report read.
The Island Park neighborhood is also high risk, as its current flood protection is primarily provided by privately owned seawalls, but adding levee protections would be extremely costly for the city to do on its own, according to a previous staff report.
“At completion, the project is going to accomplish putting the Island Park neighborhood from FEMA’s Zone AE back to Zone X, which means it will no longer be in the high-risk flood zone, so that’s the main goal of the project,” Senior Civil Engineer Elizabeth Wada said during the City Council meeting.
But the contract approved at the March 10 meeting is only committing the city to conduct preliminary technical work, she said.
“The contract we’re asking for approval for is exclusively for preliminary planning, community outreach and alternative evaluation. It is just to give the city and the Island Park community the technical information we need to determine how to move forward,” Wada said, adding that it “doesn’t commit us to any construction” and “just provides the foundation needed to decide if we want to move forward.”
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.