Editor,
Friday’s report regarding a regional transit measure is disappointing. Vote no. We don’t need another regressive transportation funding measure. Our taxes are already too high.
Editor,
Friday’s report regarding a regional transit measure is disappointing. Vote no. We don’t need another regressive transportation funding measure. Our taxes are already too high.
Why don’t the wealthy high rollers at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission suggest taxing rich technology companies and leave the little guy alone for a change? Jackie Speier is correct in preferring a business tax.
Another regressive sales tax is a bad idea. All this nickel-and-diming contributes into making the Bay Area a horribly expensive place to live, especially for people of modest means, who must pay the greatest percentage of their income in these regressive taxes and fees. Each increase by itself does not amount to much, but the cumulative effect is to add to the unaffordability of the region.
Over the last several elections, voters have passed regressive multiple tax and fee increases. Before increasing taxes yet again, waste needs to be removed from transportation projects.
Bill Hough
Los Altos
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Hough. In addition to saying no to a sales tax increase, I’d recommend saying no to an increase in business taxes, also. Businesses can pick up and leave and relocate to a fiscally managed state so increasing business taxes may result in fewer businesses. Waste needs to be removed from transportation projects and transportation agencies. Why operate at 100% capacity when there’s only 50% ridership? For union workers, of course, but not for efficiency. A sales tax increase would pay for ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits.
The MTC (with board members David Canepa, Gina Papan) could start sending the money from bridge tolls that were supposed to go to public transit to these agencies. Apparently they move bridge toll funding into a slush fund used for car-centric projects and real-estate deals.
MTC needs to be audited.
And yes, businesses should be paying more for transportation projects. Businesses have been behind the 101 express lane project and the expensive Ferry service in Redwood City. Facebook and Google both tried private ferry service in RWC, both failed due to cost - then they switched tactics and made Redwood City pay for it.
Why is the public paying for something that mostly benefits rich businesses?
Make them think more about where they put their offices and how they imagine commutes.
I say no to both taxes - why throw good money after bad money. Every one including businesses have more productive uses for the money that willl better grow our economy, jobs and income. Transit is loosing money because there's less demand for it due to the ability to work for home and else where.
car centric infrastructure is losing even more money. Billions of dollars every year that aren't covered through a 3 cent gasoline or a miniscule vehicle license fee that actually pays for education but hardly for police and emergency services.
And let's not even talk about how much money Redwood City had to spend to "harden" its 4th of July parade against the possibility of terrorists in cars breaking through barricades and running people over. And all these old concrete bridges from the 60s and 70s need to repaired now or in the near future.
Solid public transit is must-have, ADA relevant solution. Car-centric infrastructure is a boondoggle no one ever mentions but we all pay for dearly.
The reason why public transit doesn't make money here is sitting on the board of every single one of those 28 transit agencies. Politicians on these boards are not their to promote public transit, they are there to sabotage and reroute the funding.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.