Editor,
With reference to the Associated Press story, “State eyes shuttered malls and stores for new housing” in the June 1, 2021, Daily Journal, new housing sounds wonderful, to whom?
Editor,
With reference to the Associated Press story, “State eyes shuttered malls and stores for new housing” in the June 1, 2021, Daily Journal, new housing sounds wonderful, to whom?
Yes the land is there, the property owners are willing to unload a “dead horse” and regain some lost money. But, who are the real winners and losers? The winners are the cities where the new housing will be constructed, and the losers are all the people in the areas because of the water shortage. Oh! We did not think of that, or did we and just don’t care? More housing is not what is needed because all the housing that had been and is being constructed are not rented to capacity.
It is time to stop lining the pockets of the contractors and cities and start figuring how we can get some of the water into California from up north. If there can be a gas pipeline, there can be a water pipeline too. This is all a ploy by the American Planning Association that is more than likely getting “paid off” to push this horrible ploy into action.
Affordable housing is only as good as the thought. What is really “affordable” housing? Low-income families can’t afford to rent a decent place to live so how are they going to afford to buy a home and make payments and “unaffordable” property taxes too? Start worrying where we are going to get the water for what we have now.
Emil Picchi
Millbrae
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Mr. PIcchi, kudos for your common sense and unintended consequences letter. As for water, we may be able to mitigate our water shortage by significantly reducing the almost 50% of total water being sent out to sea to save non-existent fish.
What would make all the vacant housing more affordable to more people? Removing tax write-offs from owners who benefit when their housing goes empty. As for water, that is a serious issue, but forcing more and more people to the east and beyond to Nevada and Arizona isn't the answer.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.