Editor,
In his letter about the disqualification of former President Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado (and now Maine), Larry Kistler interpreted the “claims of due process” that Trump was denied to be, “let the people decide by vote.”
Editor,
In his letter about the disqualification of former President Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado (and now Maine), Larry Kistler interpreted the “claims of due process” that Trump was denied to be, “let the people decide by vote.”
I disagree. I’m quite sure that the “due process” refers to the fact that Trump has not been charged with “insurrection or rebellion,” one of the key parts of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment that was ratified shortly after the Civil War.
However, as pundits have noted, the clause does not require due process, i.e., no trial is required, although on Sept. 6, 2022, in what may have been the first time the clause was used to remove a candidate from the ballot since 1869, the candidate, New Mexico county commissioner Couy Griffin “was convicted in a bench trial in March of a misdemeanor count of entering and remaining on restricted grounds [referring to the Capitol] on Jan. 6, 2021,” according to Reuters on June 17, 2022.
In any case, the U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide the matter for all 50 states. I’m looking for an unanimous decision, with Justice Clarence Thomas recusing himself, as Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus opined on Dec. 20, 2023.
Irvin Dawid
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(6) comments
You forgot to mention that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty which defeats your entire argument.
What do you think my argument is?
My main point was to comment on what Larry Kistler wrote ["One of the cries of anguish from Republican pundits that we see frequently in the news following Colorado’s Supreme Court decision that he should not be on the ballot because he engaged in insurrection is that he deserves due process. By that, they mean let the people decide by vote. We did that in 2020 and he fomented insurrection."]
I believe "due process" refers to a trial on the insurrection charge. Trump got that trial on Feb. 9, 2021 – he was acquitted 4 days later.
However, the disqualification clause requires no such jury trial – it's what the Colorado Supreme Court and the Maine SOS decided.
Irvin, at least you're honest enough to say "I believe." It doesn't matter what you believe, because your beliefs are tainted by your overwhelming bias and disdain towards Donald Trump. It's the same way the liberal black robes twist the constitution so they can then apply their "emotions" in a way that fits their belief system. Your beliefs again will be found to be unfounded and overly emotional when the strict Constitutionalists on the Supreme Court rule that Trump can remain on all ballots throughout the United States of America. At what point will you understand that you and your liberal tree hugging cohorts can not save planet earth by riding a bike and that taking out your political enemies through hate, disdain and emotional distortions of law will not work.
Hey, Not So Common, why all the venom towards liberals? Here is the first definition of liberal: "willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas". I am a liberal and proud of it. At the same time, I do not loath or gaslight conservatives. You would do well to examine yourself and open your mind to oppositional thoughts.
As to Trump, I don't believe he Constitutionally has a right to be on any ballot this fall. However, I hope he is on all the ballots so we can defeat his behind into oblivion once and for all.
Rel, venom towards liberals? Pointing out facts about what a liberal is, not Webster’s definition, is not venomous, but rather it is needed due to liberals extreme views and desires to control every aspect of other people’s lives.
Please point out my bias and disdain in my letter which is directed at the Disqualification Clause. Considering oral arguments begin on Thursday, this is a timely request.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.