Concerned about San Mateo County Board of Supervisors policies

1). The BoS decided to take Measure K funds to fund Jackie Speier’s nonprofit in the area of child poverty. Apart from the perception of “democrats-funding-democrat-run nonprofits-no questions-asked,” the program is disconnected from reality, lacks success metrics, and shows no ownership from the county. Why is Jackie’s foundation best suited over others? Where is the discussion and analysis?

2). After supporting policies such as Prop 47, ending ICE cooperation and civilian oversight of our sheriff, some board members like Canepa have suddenly decided to take a “tough” approach to retail theft. Is it a case of amnesia to not understand cause and effect?

3). BoS tried to force a “supportive” housing program in Millbrae without prior public discussion. They struggled to answer “Will drug-users be allowed to stay here?” “What background checks are put in place?” “What is the policy for repeat offenders?” “What is the entry/exit criteria?” Absence of this data is ultimately what upset residents.

The board will benefit from developing an analytical framework to discuss new policies. It is surprising that in one of the most technologically advanced areas of the world, our leaders lack the ability to analyze data and ask five whys before policy decisions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_whys). As voters, we need to elect better leaders to govern our county.

Amit Saini

Foster City