Editor,
New York Times columnist David Brooks just wrote a column “Did the FBI just reelect Donald Trump?” He contends the dust up at Mar-a Lago has boosted Trump’s support and fundraising.
Editor,
New York Times columnist David Brooks just wrote a column “Did the FBI just reelect Donald Trump?” He contends the dust up at Mar-a Lago has boosted Trump’s support and fundraising.
I’d much prefer that this all go away by having both parties run new candidates but the Dems can’t let go of Trump as a distraction to President Biden’s poor ratings.
As a matter of law, a president has the sole authority to declassify documents anytime (except for certain nuclear ones) and Trump says he had a standing order that documents removed from the White House were deemed automatically declassified.
According to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, the far more important issue is the right to equal protection under the law. While Trump had his home raided, former Secretary of State Clinton was given a pass when the FBI found 30 super secret documents on her computer that had also been sent to disgraced Rep. Anthony Weiner’s computer.
Other examples are Obama and Sandy Berger getting a pass for stealing and destroying documents from the National Archives.
But Gen. Petraeus was convicted of far less serious offense of keeping classified documents at his home while Obama, Berger and Clinton weren’t. The FBI has a “pattern” of raiding the homes of Republican advisors in a manner befitting violent criminals while Democrats are mildly interviewed and not convicted in more serious offenses.
Ed Kahl
Woodside
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
Mr. Kahl,
Once again you offer your opinion in wide reaching, very vague terms in your attempt to paint the Democrats as evil and show no concern for the illegal, if not corrupt dealings of the Republicans. A "dust up", "super secret", "given a pass" and "less serious". Most of your "examples" have many more details than what you offer and some of your examples have been de-bunked. Next time try including some specifics, not just Fox news talking points.
Excuse me Taffy - what other detail should Ed have provided? His facts have been corroborated as reported then by several prevailing news sources. None of these stories were debunked, but perhaps conveniently forgotten by the Left. Are you watching Fox News yourself or are you relying on third party comments? Another cheap shot?
Dirk,
C’mon man, you can do better than that. As your friend Terence says, I am not going to do your homework for you. Did you even bother to verify any of Mr. Kahl’s assertions?
I will give you a couple of examples just to help you out. Obama didn’t steal documents like the Trump talking heads claim. The National Archives said that is bunk and they have control of the documents in their facility in Chicago and any of Obama’s classified docs are in their control in D.C. Even the Daily Mail, the right wing outlet in England says it is bunk.
General Petraeus was convicted not for having classified documents at his home, but for passing documents with classified information to his lover and biographer along with lying to the FBI about having them. I am not going to spend what little computer time I have explaining everything in the LTE. I will stand by my original comment that Mr. Kahl plays fast and loose with the facts and paints with a wide brush to suit his own imaginary evils of the Democrats.
Radical lefties prefer to listen to, and regurgitate, debunked fake news and lies instead of facing the truth. So thank you for your letter, Mr. Kahl, and setting the record straight. All of the Wile E. Coyote antics from the left only serve to increase our great President Trump’s influence and reach.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.