Editor,
The Belmont City Council has engaged in a fair and inclusive process to comply with the demand that it adopt district elections. The result is the creation of an equitable plan to create four districts and an at-large mayor.
Editor,
The Belmont City Council has engaged in a fair and inclusive process to comply with the demand that it adopt district elections. The result is the creation of an equitable plan to create four districts and an at-large mayor.
Four districts permit the people who live within the districts to vote for candidates who understand their unique concerns. Indeed, the population within each of the proposed districts is equal, the racial makeup within them is equal to the population, and the socio-economic makeup within each district is equal. It ensures that each neighborhood will be heard.
An at-large mayor will be accountable to the entire city and will moderate the concerns of the four districts and maintain our identity as a unified community. Five districts and no at-large mayor would divide us into small enclaves whose representatives would only be incentivized to advocate for their district. We don’t need such division.
Furthermore, the current councilmembers have ensured that Belmont has a voice in the larger Peninsula community. We have all benefited from their efforts and an at-large mayor would continue to give Belmont a seat at the larger table.
The four district and at-large mayor plan complies with the law, provides each community with a voice, and keeps us from serving only our parochial interests. It is a plan to be proud of and the council should act on it without unnecessary delay.
Brian Matthews
Belmont
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Mr. Matthews, why stop at five districts? Why not 10 or 12 to make sure that every and each constituent groups is adequately represented. After all, since coming to live here in 1979, we have had such major upheavals and political crises that we need to drastically revamp our government structure. Actually, everything was going just peachy until we got these newcomers upsetting the applecart.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.