It’s not every day that you get to witness the collapse of a bank. The 16th largest bank in the nation, at that. Well over 65,000 businesses of all sizes and shapes across the United States and Europe, the Middle East and Africa were affected, and they were focusing on solving problems for every flavor of person you can imagine.
At the end of 2022, Silicon Valley Bank held $209 billion in assets, accounting for almost half of all venture-backed companies in the United States. SVB was a pillar in the Bay Area and known for being there for entrepreneurs. They bet on your ideas when no one else would. I know — I opened my startup account there when I founded EdioLabs in 2017, seeking to bring the science of early child development to overworked and tired parents so they could feel, for 10 minutes between dinner and bedtime, that they were connecting with their kids in a meaningful way. I went to SVB because they were where everyone went when you were starting a tech-enabled company. Every person I’ve ever worked with there believed in you. I’ve never talked to so many people inside one bank who were willing to help you find the answers to questions, or help connect you with an expert who could advise you through whatever I was happening that day. The team at SVB cared about you being successful because they knew that with some capital, and help here and there, we could help a whole lot of people live better lives.
Truly something to be proud of, until you aren’t.
“Cry me a river,” the random guy on Twitter said from his computer running lightning fast with that Ryzen Threadripper Pro made by AMD, founded by two guys in a garage and a bank that took a bet on their potential.
“Let tech burn,” one woman said online from her mobile device that was designed right here and connects her to her grandkids every day through FaceTime.
The anger we are all reading about and experiencing is real. And it’s big. But the reality is that the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the pain so many people were already struggling through over the past 20 years as consumer technology, personal mobile devices and social media infiltrated our lives to great fanfare. We celebrated the conveniences of connectivity and access to more information than we ever thought possible without appropriately putting guardrails up to protect people who didn’t understand that likes, comments and follows would ultimately destroy self-esteem in our loved ones and replace it with dependency and loneliness. I’m angry about this too.
But, it would be a mistake to blame the bank for this.
Our nonprofit, the San Mateo-Foster City Education Foundation, found itself inside the SVB portfolio in 2021 when Boston Private Bank was acquired. Incidentally, we found our way to Boston Private through its acquisition of Borel Bank & Trust in 2001. Nonprofits have habitually banked with local and regional banks, but through ongoing consolidation in basically every industry, here we were holding since-liquidated assets with SVB with thousands of other nonprofits.
These nonprofits are building affordable housing, funding food pantries, tutoring socioeconomically disadvantaged students, ensuring seniors could get to their doctor appointments, and much more. Important work in our community was being funded and supported by SVB.
It’s not only nonprofits worth highlighting here — millions of paychecks were due between March 10 and March 15. My friend’s aunt had a hair salon in Boston and could not make payroll last week. Rippling, a professional employer organization serving thousands of small businesses, had to re-engineer its pipes to run payroll through a different bank after the first run failed when the FDIC shut SVB down that Friday morning.
With 63% of the U.S. population living paycheck to paycheck, the risks of triggering an economic depression overnight were existential. I am relieved and grateful that the Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve saw this and were able to design an elegant way to protect depositors while not bailing the bank out or utilizing any taxpayer dollars to do so.
In the wake of SVB’s failure, the opportunity is ripe to look at how we build a better bank for this next generation of small businesses, entrepreneurs and especially nonprofits. There are a lot of learnings to build on, and I for one am looking forward to banking with them.
Annie Tsai is the chief operating officer at Interact and board president at San Mateo-Foster City Education Foundation.
(3) comments
Annie - I believe you are right to remind many that SVB had an important function in technology investments and development. Without them we probably would not have the soft and hardware conveniences that we now take for granted. Their success at the top likely went to their heads and that is why our regulatory agencies should have stepped in. As a former Enron employee, I experienced that first had. Its business model was sound and resulted in electricity supply deregulation, wresting control from utilities. Too bad that, again, certain insider characters viewed that as an opportunity to wreck the market for some time. The electricity market recovered and so will the equivalents of SVB under better and responsible management.
Ms. Tsai, you say government officials were able to design an elegant way to protect depositors while not bailing the bank out or utilizing any taxpayer dollars to do so. Details please... If the government is ensuring deposits above $250,000 will be honored, that’s a bailout. If the government is lending money to banks to cover losses on loans, that’s using taxpayer dollars. Are we rewarding incompetent bank leadership by not allowing SVB to fail? Initial reports indicate the answer is yes. BTW, I’d recommend anyone not receiving a decent return on their savings to transfer funds to a bank/mutual fund/financial institution that will reward you.
Thank you for this Annie! I was somewhat stunned when my payroll provider wrote to let me know that my small business payroll was safe. Not stunned that it was safe, but stunned that it could have somehow been in danger. Those who cluck their tongues and say "let it burn" have no idea what those flames will destroy. I had not realized, for example, that SVB had Borel and Boston Banks inside its frame and heard from one person a concern that billions of dollars in promises for community / charity engagements could be wiped out by SVB's failure, promises made in the lead up to those mergers. My biggest concern is that the demands for deregulation, reducing oversight, are misguided and can lead to much bigger tragedies. It sounds like the SVB depositors are safe but keeping them safe is using up most of the money the FDIC had in its coffers. More, not less, oversight, I think, is needed.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.