In the 1960s, a time of deep political division and social unrest, the United States set an ambitious goal: to land a person on the moon.

Despite civil rights protests, war abroad and distrust in government, the country managed to focus its energy, align institutions and accomplish something extraordinary. That success was possible because leaders, scientists and citizens treated it like a national priority and removed the barriers that stood in the way.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(4) comments

easygerd

Astroturfing Alert!

When "regular people" talk like industry lobbyists, we usually call this Astroturfing.

We can easily neglect the "climate change deniers" here - even the oil industry is calling these guys nuts now. Just listen to Shell's Vice President of CO2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrmVKd4733k "You will struggle now to find climate deniers in oil industry - it's just become unacceptable."

But why is the writer from the "Citizens Climate Lobby", but sounding like an industry lobbyist and not an environmentalist?

quote: "projects to build solar and wind farms, battery storage systems and transmission lines are being slowed or stopped by layers of red tape"

No real environmentalist would promote desert solar farms, battery storage and transmission lines like this - all these projects are increasing GHG emissions rather than reducing it.

Esalinger

Thank you Mr McKinnon for elevating this issue! It is very important and one we don’t often think of.

We need to get to no on the bad projects faster and yes on the good projects faster! This will lower our energy costs without sacrificing the environment. And I think everyone can get behind that!

Dirk van Ulden

Mr. McKinnon's LTE should be ranked under the hyperbole of the year. To compare the controversial climate change issue with a shot to the moon is evidence of shallow discourse. If we are to effect anything to combat this elusive climate change, does Mr. McKinnon honestly believe that plastering California with solar panels and windmills is going to make one iota of difference in the universe temperature levels? I was pleased that the new DC administration has cut funding for his student indoctrination organization. Let's hope that this is his last column on this worn-out topic.

Terence Y

Thanks for your letter, Mr. McKinnon. I’d agree that permitting reform should take place. But the only true energy project with a return on investment in being “clean” would be to begin installing numerous nuclear power plants. Everything else is a band aid that won’t make a whit of difference in saving the world and in fact, may make things worse. For instance, what are you going to do with all the solar panels when they’ve outlived their useful life? How much energy from fossil fuels was burned to manufacture these solar panels? And how much will be asked from the public to subsidize these solar panels and installations? As for saving the planet, let me know when the folks taking 400+ private jets to, of all things, attend a climate conference talking the talk in lecturing others on the evils of carbon emissions, do something to walk the walk.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here