In the 1960s, a time of deep political division and social unrest, the United States set an ambitious goal: to land a person on the moon.
Despite civil rights protests, war abroad and distrust in government, the country managed to focus its energy, align institutions and accomplish something extraordinary. That success was possible because leaders, scientists and citizens treated it like a national priority and removed the barriers that stood in the way.
We need that mindset again. Today, our version of the moonshot is the transition to clean energy. But we are not moving fast enough, and one of the biggest obstacles in our way is outdated permitting.
Right now, projects to build solar and wind farms, battery storage systems and transmission lines are being slowed or stopped by layers of red tape. These projects face long delays not because of bad intentions, but because our regulatory systems were not designed to handle the scale or speed of the energy transformation now required.
Permitting reform may not sound dramatic, but it is the linchpin of climate progress. We cannot meet our climate goals while treating every clean energy project like a zoning fight or a nuisance complaint. This is a global emergency, and our permitting system needs to reflect that urgency. Reforming it means modernizing environmental review processes so we can build clean infrastructure faster, while still protecting the public interest and natural ecosystems.
At the federal level, Congress needs to pass legislation that removes key bottlenecks. The BIG WIRES Act, for example, would require better planning and coordination between regional electrical grids so that renewable energy can reach the areas that need it. Right now, many solar and wind projects are approved on paper but cannot deliver power to consumers because of a lack of transmission capacity.
The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 included some limited permitting changes, such as time limits for environmental reviews. But that was only a start. We need stronger reforms that establish clear timelines, reduce duplication between agencies and ensure clean energy projects are not stuck in legal limbo for years.
At the state level, California has made progress by streamlining approval processes for large-scale clean energy projects. But delays still happen, often because state and local agencies operate on different timelines or lack coordination. The state should continue to align permitting with its ambitious climate goals, including for transmission corridors and energy storage projects that are essential to grid reliability.
At the local level, cities and counties can take steps to speed up permitting for rooftop solar, home electrification and community-scale clean energy. They can adopt uniform building codes, invest in staff training and ensure public hearings are inclusive and efficient. Local voices matter not just in opposition, but in support. Showing up to say “yes” to climate-friendly projects is a form of advocacy too.
This also means that individuals have a role to play. People often ask what they can do to fight climate change. Beyond changing personal habits, one of the most powerful things you can do is speak up for systems-level solutions. Contact your elected representatives and tell them you support permitting reform that accelerates clean energy. Write letters to the editor. Attend town halls. Support organizations that train citizens to lobby for climate policy. You do not need to be an expert to be effective. You just need to show up.
Here in San Mateo County, we are already seeing the effects of climate change, from wildfire smoke and extreme heat to rising sea levels. We also have enormous potential to lead in electrification and clean energy. But unless we modernize our permitting systems, we risk letting bureaucracy stall the progress we desperately need. The longer we wait, the harder and more expensive the transition will become.
We got to the moon because we focused our attention, mobilized resources and refused to let process overwhelm purpose. Climate change demands the same kind of resolve. We cannot afford to let clean energy wait in line behind systems built for another century.
This is the moment to act. Let’s treat it like one.
Joel McKinnon is an accessibility specialist and climate activist with Citizens’ Climate Lobby. He lives in Montara.
(4) comments
Astroturfing Alert!
When "regular people" talk like industry lobbyists, we usually call this Astroturfing.
We can easily neglect the "climate change deniers" here - even the oil industry is calling these guys nuts now. Just listen to Shell's Vice President of CO2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrmVKd4733k "You will struggle now to find climate deniers in oil industry - it's just become unacceptable."
But why is the writer from the "Citizens Climate Lobby", but sounding like an industry lobbyist and not an environmentalist?
quote: "projects to build solar and wind farms, battery storage systems and transmission lines are being slowed or stopped by layers of red tape"
No real environmentalist would promote desert solar farms, battery storage and transmission lines like this - all these projects are increasing GHG emissions rather than reducing it.
Thank you Mr McKinnon for elevating this issue! It is very important and one we don’t often think of.
We need to get to no on the bad projects faster and yes on the good projects faster! This will lower our energy costs without sacrificing the environment. And I think everyone can get behind that!
Mr. McKinnon's LTE should be ranked under the hyperbole of the year. To compare the controversial climate change issue with a shot to the moon is evidence of shallow discourse. If we are to effect anything to combat this elusive climate change, does Mr. McKinnon honestly believe that plastering California with solar panels and windmills is going to make one iota of difference in the universe temperature levels? I was pleased that the new DC administration has cut funding for his student indoctrination organization. Let's hope that this is his last column on this worn-out topic.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. McKinnon. I’d agree that permitting reform should take place. But the only true energy project with a return on investment in being “clean” would be to begin installing numerous nuclear power plants. Everything else is a band aid that won’t make a whit of difference in saving the world and in fact, may make things worse. For instance, what are you going to do with all the solar panels when they’ve outlived their useful life? How much energy from fossil fuels was burned to manufacture these solar panels? And how much will be asked from the public to subsidize these solar panels and installations? As for saving the planet, let me know when the folks taking 400+ private jets to, of all things, attend a climate conference talking the talk in lecturing others on the evils of carbon emissions, do something to walk the walk.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.