Editor,
The recent article and City Council discussion on San Mateo’s Delaware Street bike lane project missed a critical part of the story: climate.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading.
Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal. We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content.
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
Premium Subscription
As low as $8.25 per week
Premium Includes:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
Rate | Price | Duration |
---|---|---|
1 Year | $99.00 | for 365 days |
1 Month | $20.00 | for 30 days |
1 Week | $8.25 | for 7 days |
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
DJ Basic Subscription
As low as $5 per month
Basic includes:
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
What you're missing -- Additional features available only with the Premium level:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
All for as low as $8.25 per month.
Rate | Price | Duration |
---|---|---|
1 Year | $60.00 | for 365 days |
1 Month | $12.00 | for 30 days |
1 Week | $5.00 | for 7 days |
Editor,
The recent article and City Council discussion on San Mateo’s Delaware Street bike lane project missed a critical part of the story: climate.
San Mateo’s Climate Action Plan calls for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by cutting one-person car trips. Transportation is the city’s largest source of emissions, and progress depends on making walking, biking and transit safe and practical. Yet debate and coverage focused almost entirely on traffic concerns from a handful of residents, even though the city’s Traffic Operations Analysis showed one existing vehicle lane wasn’t needed.
Preserving an extra lane for cars may seem like a compromise, but decades of research show it doesn’t solve congestion, it simply invites more people to choose driving over alternatives. Each time San Mateo defaults to prioritizing cars, it makes climate goals harder to reach while locking us into more traffic, worse air and higher emissions.
If we are serious about our Climate Action Plan, we need to judge projects by whether they give people safe and practical options other than driving. That means standing firm when change is uncomfortable, not stepping back. The proposed solution is still a step in the right direction but it locks us into a design with protected bike lanes that are narrower than industry recommendations and won’t feel as comfortable for new or casual cyclists interested in biking instead of driving.
True compromise isn’t preserving the status quo. It’s weighing today’s convenience against tomorrow’s climate crisis.
David Hunt
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
(2) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Hunt, but the issues you bring up about climate change are not a priority. Sure, you have people talking the talk about saving the world but they won’t walk the walk. And does it really reduce greenhouse gas emissions if there’s a road diet and cars spend more time idling in traffic? How many cyclists ride through the streets vs. cars? And how convenient or efficient is it to tote 10 bags of groceries or a case of bottle water home on a bike? Meanwhile, a recent article (https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/valero-refinery-newsom-21039747.php) highlights how California is planning on paying hundreds of millions of dollars to keep Valero’s refinery in Benicia from closing. I guess the state is walking the walk – to increase greenhouse gas emissions. Perhaps for convenience and efficiency? Or survival? Fossil fuels make the word go round, doesn’t it?
Removing traffic lanes to nstall another bike lane that goes virtually unused only creates more traffic congestion and increases he release of harmful emissions that cause serious health concerns.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.