Editor,
The regional transit revenue measure deserves the full support of our legislators.
Editor,
The regional transit revenue measure deserves the full support of our legislators.
This measure is well thought out, addresses a long-standing need to sustain regional transit access and reliability now and in the future.
Plain and simple: It is a good measure for all of us. This measure offers benefits for our transit users and the taxpayers.
We live an interconnected region dependent upon essential workers, many without autos or other affordable transportation. Where would we be without these workers who rely on public transportation to get to the many health, safety and food services jobs that benefit all of us?Â
Consider all the commuters needing transportation to their appointments away from home, students seeking education, disabled persons maintaining their independence and an aging population who no longer drive.Â
We simply cannot fail to support this measure.
A measure well thought out, based on public outreach to vulnerable populations and many frequent commuters all of whom make our county and region productive.
This measure is a tribute to detailed analyses by many urban transit planners, local government leaders and a persistent public who have recognized this urgent need for action while being mindful of fiscal accountability.
Sandra Lang
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Thanks for your letter, Ms. Lang, but you’re attempting to conflate the failure of passing the measure with the end of public transportation. And that’s not true at all. The fact that transit unions have been operating at 100% capacity with 50% of less of demand tells everyone that transit unions don’t want to practice any sort of fiscal management and would instead try to fool people into believing a failure to pass a measure will lead to the end of public transportation. Until these folks make an effort at fiscal management, don’t fall for the scare tactics.
We can't afford to support this measure. Vote NO on any and all transit measures (and any other tax measures). We know most, if not all, of the money will go towards paying ever increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. With no benefit to taxpayers. Remember, these folks burned plenty of money to operate at 100% capacity with only 50% or less demand. We shouldn't encourage them to continue their wasteful ways.
If Public Transportation on the Bay Area was struggling with funding, these almost 30 agencies would start merging to create synergy and reduce friction.
They do not. Just recently SamTrans, Caltrain, BART, VTA, etc. bought new headquarters and invested in more real estate dealing and wheelings an organization with fiscal problem would never pursue.
Some of the ridership issues with these agencies lead directly to SMCTA and C/CAG (Papan, Medina, Canepa, Lee) and their current push for more and more expensive highway widenings and useless highway intersections.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.