Since early 2011, Redwood City’s Downtown Precise Plan has regulated numerous aspects of private development within the city’s Downtown Precise Plan Area, the part of Redwood City most of us think of as “downtown.” The primary purpose of the plan was to revive what, back then, was a somewhat moribund central core. It rather successfully walked a fine line, trying to preserve much of the area’s essential character while allowing construction that would draw residents, merchants and jobs.
Among the many aspects of new construction specified by the DTPP is a given building’s maximum allowable height. Within the plan itself, a map of the Precise Plan Area employs colored zones to indicate maximum building heights. The two tallest zones appear as two rough concentric rings centered around Courthouse Square, with the inner ring — plus those blocks on either side of the Caltrain tracks between Jefferson and James avenues — having the highest maximum allowable height: 12 stories, or 136 feet. The outer ring is an eight-story zone, and includes a handful of exceptions where buildings can reach 10 stories. Elsewhere, there are some five- and four-story zones, plus areas along some streets (such as Broadway) where those parts of buildings that exceed three stories must be set back a prescribed distance, to keep them from looming over pedestrians.
Although the DTPP permits buildings to attain 12 stories on certain parcels, to date the highest building in Redwood City is the blue and white Indigo Apartments complex, with towers rising the allowable 10 stories. Although the most recent plans to redevelop the Sequoia Station Shopping Center showed buildings up to 12 stories tall (portions of the Sequoia Station property fall within a 12-story zone), with the recent sale to Hunter Properties we’ll have to wait and see what the center’s new owner (along with Safeway), has in mind.
When the previous owner, Lowe, published their preliminary plans for the Sequoia Station property, I heard protests from people who thought that 12-story buildings were well out of character for Redwood City. Imagine, then, what those same people must be thinking, when faced with the city’s most recently proposed development project: a high-density housing development containing two towers, one 20 stories tall and the other a whopping 28 stories — 310 feet to the top of the parapet — in height.
Twenty stories seems bad enough, but 28? I did some quick checking, and if Wikipedia is to be believed, that one tower would make this development just a tad taller than the tallest building in San Jose (not to mention, I believe, any other Bay Area city other than San Francisco or Oakland). San Jose’s tallest commercial building is 300 feet in height, and it has a 28-story residential building that tops out at 298 feet. Everything else in that city is 22 stories (286 feet) in height or less.
Recommended for you
To be fair, this proposed Redwood City project is in the very preliminary stages, and is expected to undergo many changes over the coming months. And those dizzying heights do have a benefit: they enable the project to contain 378 residential units, a bit more than 2,800 square feet of retail space and space for 164 cars, all on three parcels that, combined, are just over two acres in size (The parcels are 910 and 1000 Marshall St., plus 1800 Broadway. All sit within an eight-story zone inside the Precise Plan Area).
The residential units would be for seniors, with support for independent living, assisted living and memory care. Unlike some other residential projects recently submitted to Redwood City, the units would be offered at market rate, and not subsidized for those with lower than average incomes. Apparently, though, by exclusively targeting seniors and by relying on SB 330 — the California Housing Crisis Act of 2019 — the developer may not only be able to increase the project’s density, and add 63 units to the 315 otherwise allowed, it may also be able to bypass Redwood City’s height limits.
So, does downtown Redwood City have a 28-story tower in its future? Probably not. Between now and October, when R&M Properties intends to file a final project application with the city, it intends to evolve the project based in part on feedback from the community. And I expect that it’ll receive a great deal of feedback and pressure to reduce the project’s height. Then again, reducing the heights of the two towers would negatively affect the project’s economics, potentially making the project infeasible. Add in the fact that Redwood City needs more housing to meet its state-mandated goals, and there’s always a chance. Personally, I suspect that 28 stories might simply be a negotiating tactic, with the developer planning to settle for something between 12 and 28 stories. Time to make some popcorn: the show has just begun.
Greg Wilson is the creator of Walking Redwood City, a blog inspired by his walks throughout Redwood City and adjacent communities. He can be reached at greg@walkingRedwoodCity.com. Follow Greg on Twitter @walkingRWC.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.