Somalia government advances on capital; Mogadishu’s clan leaders debate allegiances
MOGADISHU, Somalia — Clan leaders considered abandoning Islamic militias who control the Somali capital and throwing their support to government forces, which advanced to within striking distance of this beleaguered city Wednesday.
Islamic courts fighters in Mogadishu, meanwhile, were seen changing out of their uniforms into civilian clothes. Women selling qat — the popular leafy stimulant banned by the militias — crowded the streets.
The Council of Islamic Courts seized the capital in June and went on to take much of southern Somalia, often without fighting. They were later joined by foreign militants, including Pakistanis and Arabs.
The Islamic movement seemed invincible after capturing the capital, but they are no match for Ethiopia, which has the strongest military in the Horn of Africa. Ethiopian forces crossed the border Sunday to reinforce the internationally recognized Somali government, which was bottled up in the town of Baidoa, 140 miles northwest of Mogadishu.
On Wednesday, Ethiopian and Somali government troops drove Islamic fighters out of Jowhar, the last major town on the northern road to Mogadishu. As troops entered Jowhar, an independent radio station began blasting Western music, which the militias had banned.
In Baidoa, government officials introduced journalists to a dozen soldiers who said they were forced to fight on behalf of the militias. "I was in school before the war, but the Islamic courts forced me into their army,” said Mohamed Hussein Mohamed, 15.
The U.N. refugee agency said Wednesday it was "particularly concerned about reports of civilians, including children, being forcibly recruited to join the fighting.”
Russia’s Gazprom sets time for Belarus gas cutoff, warns European customers
MOSCOW — Russian state gas monopoly OAO Gazprom said Wednesday it will halt supplies to Belarus on Jan. 1 if no new contract is signed to end a price dispute and warned European countries about the developing crisis.
The threatened cutoff raised anew concerns in the West about Russia’s reliability as the key energy supplier to Europe. Moscow halted gas supplies to Ukraine Jan. 1 in a similar dispute, causing brief disruptions in Russian gas exports to several European nations.
Gazprom is demanding that Belarus pay more than twice the current price for gas next year and hand over a 50 percent stake in its gas distribution system. It refused to back down after Minsk threatened to siphon off Russian natural gas bound for Europe in the event of a suspension of supplies.
"If a gas supply contract for next year is not reached, Gazprom will have no grounds for deliveries of gas to Belarus as of 10 a.m. Moscow time (0700GMT) on Jan. 1, 2007,” Gazprom chief Alexei Miller said in televised comments.
Miller said that Gazprom would supply gas for European consumers to the Russia-Belarus border "in full volume and in full compliance with its contracts,” but a Belarusian official hinted earlier that Belarus could hinder supplies to Europe across its territory if Gazprom suspends deliveries meant for Belarus.
Miller said Gazprom has sent letters to Germany, Poland and Lithuania informing them about "the developing situation regarding gas supplies to Belarus.”
About 30 percent of Russian gas supplies to Europe transit through Belarus, much of it to Germany, Poland and Lithuania.
Gazprom officials had threatened to halt supplies if no contract was signed before the existing one expires Dec. 31, but Miller’s comments marked the first time the company set an hour.
Recommended for you
He said fresh talks Wednesday had failed because "the Belarusian side continues to take a destructive position.”
The remarks came after Belarusian First Deputy Prime Minister Vladimir Semashko shrugged off the threat of a suspension, warning that Gazprom relies on Belarus for transit to Europe and could not risk facing the international criticism it received during the Ukraine dispute.
Russia, the world’s largest gas producer, provides a quarter of Europe’s gas consumption.
"I don’t think Gazprom will resolve to cut off gas to Belarus — they shouldn’t step on the same rake twice,” he said.
"We are interconnected,” Semashko said after unsuccessful talks Tuesday with Miller. "I have no contract with Mr. Miller on deliveries to Belarus from Jan. 1, and Mr. Miller has no contract on transit through Belarus.”
Gazprom spokesman Sergei Kupriyanov said the company, which initially insisted Belarus pay $200 per 1,000 cubic meters of gas next year but is now asking for $105, is not prepared to go lower.
"Gazprom is not Santa Claus,” he said in televised comments.
The head of Gazprom’s export arm, Alexander Medvedev, said the company would seek to ensure that European customers would not face supply shortages if Belarus hindered the transit of Russian gas.
However, Interfax quoted him as saying that if Belarus were to siphon off the full amount it normally received for its own consumption, "it would be impossible to fully compensate ... especially over a long period.”
Russia supplies Belarus about 20 billion cubic meters of gas annually, and Semashko said that 44 billion cubic meters are expected to transit through Belarus to Europe next year.
Early in 2006, Gazprom had to pump additional gas to Europe to make up for supply shortages caused by its cutoff of gas to Ukraine, which was accused of skimming off Russian gas bound for the West.
Belarus now pays $47 per 1,000 cubic meters. Russia supplied gas to ex-Soviet states at below-market prices for years after the 1991 Soviet collapse, but now wants to sell all its gas at world prices.
A higher price would be a blow to Belarus’ Soviet-style state-run industries, whose financial health — and, in turn, a portion of longtime President Alexander Lukashenko’s popularity — depend on cheap gas.
In addition to raising the price, Russia wants Belarus to cede Gazprom a 50 percent stake in its gas distribution system, Beltransgaz.
The politically charged dispute reflects seriously strained relations between Belarus and Russia, which have the closest ties of any two ex-Soviet republics and signed a treaty in the mid 1990s to create a close union.
Russia has supported the authoritarian Lukashenko in the face of severe Western criticism, but relations have been tense under Russian President Vladimir Putin, who angered Lukashenko a few years ago by suggesting an integration scenario under which Belarus would become little more than a Russian province.
Under Gazprom’s offer, Belarus would pay $75 per 1,000 cubic meters in cash and $30 in shares of Beltransgaz in 2007. The price would increase gradually and approach a market-style European price — minus transit fees and export tariffs — in 2010.
Amid Wednesday’s back-and-forth threats, Miller said Russia could increase the price Belarus pays for gas by subjecting sales to export tariffs. In Minsk, Semashko threatened to increase transit fees if Gazprom raises prices.

(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.