The race to save Bay Meadows from demolition is as good as over after city officials announced Wednesday a referendum petition to save the San Mateo landmark did not gather enough votes to qualify for the June ballot.
The San Mateo County Elections Office checked all of the petition’s 5,708 signatures during the past week. The petition needed 4,661 valid signatures to qualify for the ballot. Only 4,525 were found to be those of registered San Mateo voters. Of the 1,183 insufficient signatures, 88 belonged to people who mailed postcards to City Hall requesting their names be removed from the petition. A total of 529 of those cards were actually mailed to City Hall, according to a statement released Wednesday by San Mateo City Clerk Norma Gomez.
Friends of Bay Meadows, the preservationist group that circulated the petition, isn’t ready to admit defeat.
"It’s a very good bet that we’ll be challenging the recall cards in court,” said Linda Schinkel, founder of Friends of Bay Meadows.
Bay Meadows spokesman Adam Alberti said race track officials are "relieved by the return.” The future of Bay Meadows from this point on will depend on the development deal and timeline approved by the City Council last month, Alberti said.
Residents still have about a year to voice their opinions while the Planning Commission reviews specific designs for the mixed-use development.
Councilwoman Carole Groom hopes those involved with the referendum petition remain involved with the planning process.
"I believe deeply in democracy and I believe all steps in the democratic process were taken,” Groom said. "I do hope this means we can move forward.”
The City Council took much criticism from residents who felt the Bay Meadows planning process was hindered by a pro-development council. Opponents of the project complain the council appointed residents with the same views to a citizens’ advisory committee that met for five years to help develop the project. Groom served on the advisory committee, which met up to twice a month for three to four hours a meeting. Every meeting was open to the public.
Recommended for you
The Public Works Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the project before the Planning Commission spent nearly a year fine tuning the project. It recommended the project to the City Council this summer. The council unanimously approved it on Nov. 7. The council also hired a third party attorney to review the development agreement, an independent financial report to analyze the project’s fiscal benefits and requested a renowned horse racing expert to explain why race tracks are dying.
"We did what the public asked us to,” Groom said. "When you look at the changes, it’s clear they were heard. This project today is nothing like it was when we began.”
Friends of Bay Meadows began circulating the referendum petition on Nov. 8, just one day after the San Mateo City Council unanimously approved the plan. About 85 volunteers helped collect the 5,708 signatures in less than 30 days. On Dec. 7, Gomez and City Attorney Shawn Mason noticed "defects” while reviewing the petition. The city hired an independent attorney to determine whether they were significant enough to nullify the petition.
On Dec. 15, the city announced the defects were not significant enough to delay the count. The County Elections Office began verifying every signature Dec. 19 and finished the count Tuesday night.
San Mateo will uphold the Nov. 7 decision of the City Council to allow Bay Meadows to be demolished and redeveloped. It will take no further action on the petition, according to Wednesday’s statement by Gomez.
The Bay Meadows Land Company plans to replace the aging 83.5-acre race track on Delaware Street near Hillsdale Boulevard with 1,250 residential units, 1.25 million square feet of office space and 150,000 square feet of retail space. It is touted as a transit-oriented development, but opponents believe it will create traffic problems and destroy a 75-year-old San Mateo landmark.
The proposed project is twice the size of Bay Meadows Phase I which was completed in 2000.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.