South City efforts to move ahead on anti-displacement policies — such as rent stabilization and tenant protection programs — are further along than many Peninsula cities, though some housing experts say it’s still not enough to move the needle.
The city is putting the finishing touches on a community advisory committee, which would focus on compiling various recommendations on how to prevent evictions and displacement during its two-year charter. The effort has been a discussion point for several years, growing more acute as a result of pandemic-induced small business closures, and is what Vice Mayor Eddie Flores says is critical to ensuring that current residents, including youth, can afford to live there long term.
“We can’t just say, ‘It’s just changing times.’ No, we want to really examine what is going on, and be able to learn from other communities,” Flores said.
Anti-displacement is often used as an umbrella term to discuss numerous approaches to preserve renters’ current housing, such as rent stabilization, anti-harassment and just clause ordinances, which put additional restrictions on eviction justifications. While the city has not identified which policies with which they will move forward, Flores said they are all on the table until more research has been completed.
But even with committees in place, anti-displacement policies have proven difficult to get approved in many cities throughout the county. East Palo Alto and Redwood City are the only jurisdictions in the county to form such groups, though the Half Moon Bay City Council is close to finalizing some rent control and other tenant protections. And while East Palo Alto has enacted rent stabilization and tenant protection programs, Redwood City is still working on gathering enough signatures to put similar initiatives on the November ballot after unsuccessful attempts to move it forward on the City Council.
While Leah Simon-Weisberg, executive director of California Center for Movement Legal Services, said it’s important cities like South San Francisco are surfacing such concerns, but establishing two-year long committees often result in few, if any, meaningful actions to protect tenants.
“If you want something to get done, you don’t send it to a committee. If you don’t want something done, you send it to a committee,” she said. “These policies are no-brainers … there’s not a lot that needs to be debated. The longer you wait, the more people will be displaced.”
Recommended for you
As currently proposed, the committee would comprise a combination of individuals, including residential renters, landlords and a real estate professional. Flores stated that gathering a mix of entities is critical for comprehensive policy that isn’t reactive or rushed, though Simon-Weisberg said including Realtors or landlords, who have proven instrumental in exacerbating the problem, should be a non-starter.
The committee would also include commercial tenants as a way to represent small business owners who have been affected by rental costs, especially since the pandemic, as restaurants, including Keith’s Chicken and Waffles on El Camino Real, have moved to other cities or shuttered altogether due to high rents.
Councilmembers indicated support for the committee, although applications will not open until selection committee criteria is finalized.
“We have a good record for many of our advisory groups. During the pandemic, we created the Commission on Racial and Social Equity, which provided significant recommendations that were implemented soon after,” Flores said. “This doesn’t mean we have to take everything we’re given, but it will give us insight into where we need to go.”
As a reminder, Burlingame, San Mateo, and Mountain View all had rent stabilization ballot measures in 2016. Mountain View passed, while San Mateo and Burlingame garnered 30 percent of the vote. All done by grassroots volunteers and not insignificant. The initiatives forced the real estate industry to spend millions of dollars in opposition. Our groups had paltry sums in comparison. The mostly homeowning voters were smothered with lies and propaganda, using racist tropes and images of prostitutes invading neighborhoods. Local conservative councilmembers happily joined in opposition. How might communities be more stabilized today, and lives have been improved, by enacting those measures? Instead, greed has not been reined in, and people have had to leave or now pay well over half of their income in rent. And the cancer has spread throughout the country.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
As a reminder, Burlingame, San Mateo, and Mountain View all had rent stabilization ballot measures in 2016. Mountain View passed, while San Mateo and Burlingame garnered 30 percent of the vote. All done by grassroots volunteers and not insignificant. The initiatives forced the real estate industry to spend millions of dollars in opposition. Our groups had paltry sums in comparison. The mostly homeowning voters were smothered with lies and propaganda, using racist tropes and images of prostitutes invading neighborhoods. Local conservative councilmembers happily joined in opposition. How might communities be more stabilized today, and lives have been improved, by enacting those measures? Instead, greed has not been reined in, and people have had to leave or now pay well over half of their income in rent. And the cancer has spread throughout the country.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.