The San Mateo Union High School District is operating in a slight deficit this fiscal year, but its designation as community funded district provides stability to multi-year financial projections, the Board of Trustees learned at a Dec. 11 study session meeting.
The overall general fund balance is projected to decrease, said Associate Superintendent Yancy Hawkins, but the district will continue to maintain an abundant reserve, because it is community funded — receiving most of its revenue from local property taxes.
“In a positive way, we’re a little bit insulated here,” Hawkins said. “We still have to do our work but it is nice to note that we are funded by property taxes which are a much more stable funding source than the state of California as a whole.”
The district is working with around $232 million in revenue, with a project expenditure of around $240 million. The general fund’s ending balance is projected to remain above $46 million.
State funding will likely present some concerns for other districts who primarily rely on state and federal revenue, Hawkins acknowledged, and matters such as insurance costs and federal regulations may still present its own challenges to the district.
Pension costs have significantly increased, costing districts almost double what they were required a decade ago. Hawkins said these financial commitments are determined by the state and the board has no jurisdiction over the matter.
“The next couple of years are going to be pretty interesting in the state of California,” Hawkins said. “Our district is in good financial shape compared to most districts in the state.”
The district will also begin seeing the step down in the next two years of one-time expenditures that were received mostly from the pandemic, but will soon not be available.
“Although these funds were sorely needed, appreciated and put to good use to support our students, they do cause some issues,” Hawkins said.
Recommended for you
Certain staff positions, including a social worker, psychologist and campus safety specialist are currently funded by sources sunsetting in 2026, and the district will have to review these contracts and positions over the next year to explore funding opportunities that might fill any necessary gaps.
The district’s reserve of more than $13 million ultimately provides stability to its three-year fiscal projections.
Hawkins noted a significant majority of money spent is on its personnel — 81% of its money spent goes to salaries for its certificated and classified staff, as well as their respective benefits.
“We are in a people business, the vast majority of our expenditures go to people,” Hawkins said.
Another significant expenditure is the amount the district dedicated to sustaining its special education programs and mental health services. State and federal funding covers less than 20% of costs necessary to special education, Hawkins said, which shows they “continue not to meet their commitment for funding.”
The study session was purely informational and no action was made by the board, and detailed information on line items can be found in the special board meeting study session agenda packet.
“I just think it’s so important whether we have people watching or not, part of being a professional governance team is being extremely transparent about the budget,” Superintendent Randall Booker said.
Folks, this goes to show you that previous parcel taxes were never necessary as there’s an ample balance in the bank. And as I’ve said many times, parcel taxes will only go towards paying ever-increasing pensions and benefits, as evidenced by the statement, “Pension costs have significantly increased, costing districts almost double what they were required a decade ago.” So please vote NO on future parcel tax measures.
“We are in a people business, the vast majority of our expenditures go to people,” Hawkins said. Hey - I was under the mistaken impression that schools are in the education business. My bad!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Folks, this goes to show you that previous parcel taxes were never necessary as there’s an ample balance in the bank. And as I’ve said many times, parcel taxes will only go towards paying ever-increasing pensions and benefits, as evidenced by the statement, “Pension costs have significantly increased, costing districts almost double what they were required a decade ago.” So please vote NO on future parcel tax measures.
“We are in a people business, the vast majority of our expenditures go to people,” Hawkins said. Hey - I was under the mistaken impression that schools are in the education business. My bad!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.