San Mateo’s Infrastructure and Sustainability Commission expressed interest in further restrictions on gas appliances in future reach codes, calling for more electric options in new and existing buildings.
In San Mateo, it is currently required that specific building types be all-electric, including new residential construction and new office buildings. However, the city is exploring stricter reach codes for gas appliance options and more emphasis on building electrification and electric vehicle infrastructure, discussed at a recent April 13 commission meeting.
Opinions were mixed, with commissioners seeking consistency, an end date for the use of gas in the city, and also awareness of the cost to individuals of switching to all-electric in existing buildings.
A goal for the City Council this year was established to reduce emissions and phase out natural gas in buildings by 2030 to limit carbon emissions, with its Climate Action Plan declaring its greenhouse gas emission reduction goals a priority.
City staff recommended all new construction be electric, with fewer blanket exemptions for gas options given the availability of electric equipment. Staff also suggested establishing a process and criteria for gas exemptions instead of blanket bans. Several commissioners like Vice Chair Kimiko Narita supported following staff recommendations. She noted staff recommendations come from stakeholders like affordable housing developers and Peninsula Clean Energy, who have put significant time and energy into coming up with changes. She said at some point, the city needed to move away from gas as the default infrastructure option, given the health and environmental concerns.
“It’s on city councils across the Bay Area to pass something consistent, so developers have that certainty and consistency, and we don’t create misaligned incentives to move development from one city to another just to game reach codes,” Narita said.
Chair Adam Loraine favored looking at end dates and triggers for gas usage, given the importance of city priorities. He preferred more stringent electric reach codes for new and existing buildings, with some delayed implementation.
“I would like us to please consider an end-of-flow date for gas, as Half Moon Bay has done, as others are moving towards. Maybe it’s 2045. Maybe it’s 2030, given the mayor’s priority. Maybe it’s somewhere in between,” Loraine said.
Recommended for you
The city is making recommendations based on findings from the Bay Area Reach Codes team, a coalition of various government organizations like Peninsula Clean Energy, Silicon Valley Clean Energy, East Bay Community Energy and the San Mateo County Office of Sustainability. San Mateo is embarking on a new reach code process before the current one expires Dec. 31. This fall, the city will adopt new codes, lasting three years and starting Jan. 1, 2023.
According to a city staff report, transportation accounts for 50% of greenhouse gas emissions in San Mateo, followed by electricity and natural gas use in buildings at 34% of emissions.
The city is focusing on electric vehicle readiness in infrastructure and equipment during construction upgrades to meet future demand. This strategy includes more panels, circuits and outlets available in single-family homes, two-family townhomes, multifamily buildings and office buildings. Outlets could be installed during kitchen or laundry room renovations in single-family residents. The commissioners did not express interest in requiring electric heat pump water heating for existing single-family homes.
Commissioner Susan Rowinski remained worried about the burden of increased costs of switching to electric appliances for the elderly and working-class, such as heat pump water heaters in single-family residences. She noted rebates are often temporary or insufficient to ensure equity for those in need. Several people in her neighborhood are hesitant to submit permits for new work and are worried about additional costs. She wanted to persuade people to come into the fold and transition instead of forcing it upon them.
“I just can’t see how some of this is going to work out, given the availability of, or lack of availability of the rebates,” Rowinski said.
I recently started listening to the All In podcast, one interesting thing I found out is a by product of the natural gas is a component for fertilizers. I am wondering if we have a replacement for this otherwise food costs and availability will be severely impacted. There are clearly worse offenders to green house gas emissions that should be retired before natural gas. While I have a gas stove at home I do 90% of my oven cooking using a counter top toaster oven and heat my water using an electric kettle, I do not see the need to replace a stove that I would not use more than I do now just because the City tells me to do so.
Welcome to the world of a decision making process that is devoid of even exploring alternatives but caving in to group think. Notice that the reach codes are pushed by electricity-only suppliers such as Peninsula Clean Energy and others that are not subject to regulation other than to their respective Boards. Conversion should be voluntary and not forced onto us who do not have the means to start paying for hefty upgrades and skyrocketing utility bills. Regardless of these commission assertions, most electricity will still come from fossil-fueled generation so these ordinances are just another farce that will come to haunt us.
All electric buildings (and driving and cooking) are lower cost, healthier, safer, will generate jobs and is in the national security interest as we seek to go beyond the toxic influence of petro oligarchs. The UN's IPCC6 part 3 report says the end date for gas needs to be now, because the atmospheric pollution from fossil fuels has already filled the 1.5 degree available space. The challenge now is staying under two degrees to avoid 50% stronger droughts, fires, and floods. The challenge for any infrastructure and sustainability effort is how to get to a two degree definition in a timely manner.
The silliest argument ever. Most oil is actually used for clothing and other daily needs besides combustion. Do you really believe that household natural gas usage is going to save the planet? Please elaborate on lower cost as you must have been dreaming of AOC and the already discredited IPCC6 report.
Here we go again… Hey SMISC, where is all this magic electricity going to come from? Are you hoping Newsom will authorize another 5, or more, gas generating plants in CA to supply electricity? It's easy to ignore how the sausage is made, as long as it’s made in some other county. Maybe power companies can set tiered limits for electricity usage for each county, similar to what they do for households. These higher rates can then be sent to the counties which must endure the gas generating plants polluting their air. I know, I know, pollution isn’t contained in a geographic area, but do folks pushing for electrification know this?
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
Natural gas heating and cooking are really nice when there is a loss of electricity.
I recently started listening to the All In podcast, one interesting thing I found out is a by product of the natural gas is a component for fertilizers. I am wondering if we have a replacement for this otherwise food costs and availability will be severely impacted. There are clearly worse offenders to green house gas emissions that should be retired before natural gas. While I have a gas stove at home I do 90% of my oven cooking using a counter top toaster oven and heat my water using an electric kettle, I do not see the need to replace a stove that I would not use more than I do now just because the City tells me to do so.
Welcome to the world of a decision making process that is devoid of even exploring alternatives but caving in to group think. Notice that the reach codes are pushed by electricity-only suppliers such as Peninsula Clean Energy and others that are not subject to regulation other than to their respective Boards. Conversion should be voluntary and not forced onto us who do not have the means to start paying for hefty upgrades and skyrocketing utility bills. Regardless of these commission assertions, most electricity will still come from fossil-fueled generation so these ordinances are just another farce that will come to haunt us.
All electric buildings (and driving and cooking) are lower cost, healthier, safer, will generate jobs and is in the national security interest as we seek to go beyond the toxic influence of petro oligarchs. The UN's IPCC6 part 3 report says the end date for gas needs to be now, because the atmospheric pollution from fossil fuels has already filled the 1.5 degree available space. The challenge now is staying under two degrees to avoid 50% stronger droughts, fires, and floods. The challenge for any infrastructure and sustainability effort is how to get to a two degree definition in a timely manner.
The silliest argument ever. Most oil is actually used for clothing and other daily needs besides combustion. Do you really believe that household natural gas usage is going to save the planet? Please elaborate on lower cost as you must have been dreaming of AOC and the already discredited IPCC6 report.
Here we go again… Hey SMISC, where is all this magic electricity going to come from? Are you hoping Newsom will authorize another 5, or more, gas generating plants in CA to supply electricity? It's easy to ignore how the sausage is made, as long as it’s made in some other county. Maybe power companies can set tiered limits for electricity usage for each county, similar to what they do for households. These higher rates can then be sent to the counties which must endure the gas generating plants polluting their air. I know, I know, pollution isn’t contained in a geographic area, but do folks pushing for electrification know this?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.