While grappling with constantly increasing construction costs, San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District officials were dealt another setback in their pursuit of building a new Foster City school.
The district Board of Trustees approved Thursday, Jan. 25, a variety of cost-cutting measures intended to trim the budget for the school construction now running nearly $11.5 million past initial projections.
Officials agreed to efforts designed to reduce the expected $41.5 project cost by about $3.5 million, most notably by deciding to hold off on construction of a campus wing designed to house five classrooms.
Board Vice President Audrey Ng acknowledged the difficulty of the decisions, noting the extensive outreach school officials have conducted to gather community support for the initial school design.
“It’s challenging to come back to the public and say ‘you know what? These things are more expensive than we expected, so we are going to have to trim things down,’” she said.
The cost-saving measures are invited through skyrocketing construction costs, as the project was initially budgeted at $30 million, according to a district report. The budget to redevelop the Charter Square shopping center into a school site jumped to $37 million last August, and grew even more expensive in recent months.
Ng attributed hikes in material and labor costs as the source of the district’s budget issues, noting the expenses have plagued all of the school system’s work financed with Measure X bond revenue.
“The costs of all our projects are increasing, that means the projects in San Mateo as well as Foster City,” she said.
The district is in the process of building new gyms at San Mateo middle schools, and the next phase of construction is slated to include development of a fourth Foster City elementary school at the corner of Shell and Beach Park boulevards. Officials have claimed the new campus is necessary to offset overcrowding, generated by ongoing enrollment growth.
Some of the overruns can be addressed through funds set aside to address cost hikes, said Ng, but the district’s coffers cannot accommodate the full scope of the most recent budget projection.
Small project amendments including changes to the air circulation systems, different materials and altered lighting systems, which can generate about $1 million in savings, according to the report.
Recommended for you
But a bulk of the reductions likely will come from shrinking the immediate scope of the project, by electing to hold off on building a campus wing designed to house five classrooms. Such an amendment could save $2.5 million, according to the report.
Ng said officials still plan to build the wing, which could accommodate about 125 students. The district will wait until state bond money designed to help pay for school construction is available to move ahead with that phase of the project, said Ng.
“Eventually we will do that cluster of five classrooms, but we see that as something we will do once we get funding from the state,” she said.
The cost-cutting measures are the most recent in a series of hurdles officials have encountered in their pursuit of the Foster City school.
Foster City officials have also been at odds with educators over the potential traffic, parking and noise issues generated by the project, leading to a series of talks designed to address the concerns.
The discussions followed Foster City Councilman Herb Perez suing to block the campus development, claiming school officials subverted the open bid process when agreeing to purchase the shopping center and construct the school for $61 million. The lawsuit was settled as school officials agreed to consider the city’s concerns regarding construction.
Looking ahead, Ng said officials will continue to keep close tabs on the project budget. Costs will likely become more clear once construction bids come back, she said.
She noted the challenges for officials tied to the cost cutting, characterizing the decisions as painful, but said the district was left with little choice in the pursuit of breaking ground on a badly-needed campus.
“It’s unfortunate, but we have to balance our budget,” she said.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

(3) comments
I question the real estate development expertise of most of our local, public officials.
What I can’t fathom is why some city leaders have been doing all in their power to block, impede and obstruct construction of this much needed school. One council member seems to have a personal agenda against the only school board member who lives in Foster City. It all seems to have devolve from two council members extreme interest in using part of the school site for teacher workforce housing—even thogh the district had not identified the need. The actions of the council and the city manager doing their dirty work is completely anathema to the best interests of our elementary school children. It’s time to ask these council members what their real agenda is?
Both San Mateo and Foster City should donate Public Works time to the School District to help them during their challenging time to help bid and manage the project. The public should be vigilant, loud, and critical of private sector service providers/consultants who omit information, and do not hold the public's interest in the highest regard. At the moment Westlake and Lusardi appear to be the most active, they are just as guilty, if not more guilty, of doing a poor job. If they do not clean up their act then they should not have future opportunities for public projects, and the private sector should be seriously concerned in hiring them for their own projects.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.