Rents in San Mateo — already among the nation’s most expensive — jumped again in July, marking the seventh straight month during which the cost of living locally increased, according a recent report.

Apartmentlist.com shows last month the city’s median rent for a single-bedroom unit rose to $3,540 and ticked up to $4,450 for a two-bedroom unit, marking an 0.8 percent hike from the month prior and a 2.5 percent jump from this time last year.

Recommended for you

Daily journal dollar bill generic image

Recommended for you

(10) comments

Seasoned Observer

2.5% increase in asking prices for rental units coming on the market and 3.8% inflation in the area so it looks like the recent wave of new construction is having the desired affect; rents are increasing at a rate lower than overall inflation in the region.

Eaadams

Seasoned Observer, that isn't how inflation math works. Shelter is only part of total number. It is impossible for inflation to equal housing increases, it it did it would mean zero in all other sectors

Hikertom

There is plenty of room to add significant amounts of housing in the existing urban area on the Peninsula. Strip malls, with large parking lots, and low density industrial areas with one story buildings are a good place to start. The strip mall is an obsolete concept that makes people car dependent. To reduce traffic we need lots of housing close to downtowns and public transportation. Housing close to public transportation and within a walkable distance from stores and restaurants doesn't increase traffic-- it reduces traffic.

Thomas Morgan

I don't think we can simply accept what is posted on a website since it lends itself to availability bias. The types of apartments on these sites clearly have more money to market their properties, and would exclude mom and pop landlords (which would bring the average down). The only valid way is to form a rental registry which require annual data be filed and updated.

vincent wei

A new report out from the Legislative Analyst's Office shows that the groundwork for the housing shortage was laid a long time ago, and it's going to be hard work undoing it.

If California had added 210,000 new housing units each year over the past three decades (as opposed to 120,000), California’s population would be much greater than it is today. We estimate that around 7 million additional people would be living in California. In some areas, particularly the Bay Area, population increases would be dramatic. For example, San Francisco’s population would be more than twice as large (1.7 million people versus around 800,000).The state probably would have to build as many as 100,000 additional units annually—almost exclusively in its coastal communities—to seriously mitigate its problems with housing affordability." And that's in addition to the 100,000 to 140,000 units that the Golden State is already planning to build.

If the state had done all that, California's housing prices still would have continued to grow and would still be higher than the rest of the country's now, but the disparity between them would have been less gaping. If California had done all that, the report says, the 2010 state median housing price would have been a solid 80 percent higher than the US median, instead of 200 percent higher, which is what actually happened.
https://la.curbed.com/2015/3/18/9979526/housing-crisis-los-angeles-construction

JordanG

Vincent, that study isn't new -- it's from 2015. It is a great study report though, with a very clear conclusion: we need to build a lot more housing at all income levels as quickly as possible.

Christopher Conway

Another article telling us that rents are going up and we must build more to solve the problem or it is going to be Armageddon for us. Question is, who is the Bay Area Council and why should we for a minute care what they think?

Seasoned Observer

Remember - these are asking rents, not necessarily the rents that every renter is paying. Many landlords are keeping their rents below market.

Eaadams

If government made decissions based on such intangibles there would be heck to pay. These things are tracked so we know where we are going and where we came from

Eaadams

2.5% and regional CPI is around 3.8%. If your raise isn't at least 4% you are being given a pay cut by your employer. Legalize housing or just decide you aren't a liberal progressive. This lack of housing is turning our society into a two class society. Goodbye from a renter who is absolutely terrified.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here