Rents in San Mateo — already among the nation’s most expensive — jumped again in July, marking the seventh straight month during which the cost of living locally increased, according a recent report.
Apartmentlist.com shows last month the city’s median rent for a single-bedroom unit rose to $3,540 and ticked up to $4,450 for a two-bedroom unit, marking an 0.8 percent hike from the month prior and a 2.5 percent jump from this time last year.
While Rentcafe.com shows lower costs, suggesting the average rent for studio through three-bedroom unit was $3,255 last month, it considers San Mateo the nation’s fourth most expensive market behind Manhattan, San Francisco and Boston.
With the high cost of living continually rising, some business experts are questioning the lasting repercussions for a region where those on the lower rungs of the income level are frequently priced out.
“What we have seen is a definite change in the mix of our economy,” said Matt Regan, of the Bay Area Council. “We’re seeing a lot more activity and lot more hiring and growth expansion at the top of the economy and a lot of displacement at the lower end. … It remains to be seen if that is a sustainable growth model. But I would argue that is a very dangerous experiment to engage in.”
Regan, representing the business advocacy group, makes the point that the Bay Area’s economy as a whole is likely not threatened, as job creation continues to outpace the rest of the nation and the value produced locally rivals that of other developed countries.
More concerning, he said, is the trend toward a top-heavy region, comprised mostly of the wealthy and those who can afford astronomically expensive rents and mortgages while the rest leave to seek more affordable parts of the state and nation.
“As we continue to grow and well-educated and ambitious people come to this economy and live in the Bay Area, they are displacing existing residents who are lower on the income scale,” he said.
The only remedy Regan said is building more housing, of which he claims the Bay Area generally and Peninsula specifically has not done nearly enough.
“It’s not sustainable from a societal or environmental perspective,” he said. “We need to do a better job of building housing in the Bay Area to accommodate our economic growth.”
The Rentcafe report argues the imbalance between housing supply and demand exists not just locally but across the nation, resulting in rates rising throughout the United States.
“Seasonal demand and increased activity are offsetting the wave of new apartments opened this year so far, translating into an even, but moderately strong yearly growth across all apartment sizes,” according to the report.
As a result, the national average rent jumped to an all-time high of $1,409 in July, up 2.8 percent from this time last year, according to a survey of the nation’s 250 largest cities.
The report also illustrates the ripple effect of the Bay Area’s cost of living, as Sacramento, Stockton and Fresno were among the nation’s top five mid-size cities to show the most aggressive growth last year. Rents in each city grew by an average of 5.6 percent since last year, outpaced only by Tampa, Florida, where rents jumped 6 percent over the same period of time. Of the three state cities, the most expensive is Sacramento, where average rents jumped to $1,337, according to the report.
The Bay Area is much more expensive, as the median rents among the 10 largest cities floated to $2,505 last month, according to the Apartmentlist report.
Some critics advise caution when taking in national rent reports, suggesting the websites stick to surveying newer units, pushing the median prices higher than a true reflection of the market. To that end, a quick Craigslist search reveals one-bedroom units in San Mateo renting for around $2,500 per month, while others float as high as about $4,000.
Ultimately though, the Apartmentlist report succinctly details the challenges facing those on the local rental market.
“Compared to most large cities across the country, San Mateo is less affordable for renters,” according to the report.
(10) comments
2.5% increase in asking prices for rental units coming on the market and 3.8% inflation in the area so it looks like the recent wave of new construction is having the desired affect; rents are increasing at a rate lower than overall inflation in the region.
Seasoned Observer, that isn't how inflation math works. Shelter is only part of total number. It is impossible for inflation to equal housing increases, it it did it would mean zero in all other sectors
There is plenty of room to add significant amounts of housing in the existing urban area on the Peninsula. Strip malls, with large parking lots, and low density industrial areas with one story buildings are a good place to start. The strip mall is an obsolete concept that makes people car dependent. To reduce traffic we need lots of housing close to downtowns and public transportation. Housing close to public transportation and within a walkable distance from stores and restaurants doesn't increase traffic-- it reduces traffic.
I don't think we can simply accept what is posted on a website since it lends itself to availability bias. The types of apartments on these sites clearly have more money to market their properties, and would exclude mom and pop landlords (which would bring the average down). The only valid way is to form a rental registry which require annual data be filed and updated.
A new report out from the Legislative Analyst's Office shows that the groundwork for the housing shortage was laid a long time ago, and it's going to be hard work undoing it.
If California had added 210,000 new housing units each year over the past three decades (as opposed to 120,000), California’s population would be much greater than it is today. We estimate that around 7 million additional people would be living in California. In some areas, particularly the Bay Area, population increases would be dramatic. For example, San Francisco’s population would be more than twice as large (1.7 million people versus around 800,000).The state probably would have to build as many as 100,000 additional units annually—almost exclusively in its coastal communities—to seriously mitigate its problems with housing affordability." And that's in addition to the 100,000 to 140,000 units that the Golden State is already planning to build.
If the state had done all that, California's housing prices still would have continued to grow and would still be higher than the rest of the country's now, but the disparity between them would have been less gaping. If California had done all that, the report says, the 2010 state median housing price would have been a solid 80 percent higher than the US median, instead of 200 percent higher, which is what actually happened.
https://la.curbed.com/2015/3/18/9979526/housing-crisis-los-angeles-construction
Vincent, that study isn't new -- it's from 2015. It is a great study report though, with a very clear conclusion: we need to build a lot more housing at all income levels as quickly as possible.
Another article telling us that rents are going up and we must build more to solve the problem or it is going to be Armageddon for us. Question is, who is the Bay Area Council and why should we for a minute care what they think?
Remember - these are asking rents, not necessarily the rents that every renter is paying. Many landlords are keeping their rents below market.
If government made decissions based on such intangibles there would be heck to pay. These things are tracked so we know where we are going and where we came from
2.5% and regional CPI is around 3.8%. If your raise isn't at least 4% you are being given a pay cut by your employer. Legalize housing or just decide you aren't a liberal progressive. This lack of housing is turning our society into a two class society. Goodbye from a renter who is absolutely terrified.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.