When Hector Alvarado, a husband and father residing in Redwood City, fell ill with COVID-19 in early September, his initial response was to isolate himself away from his wife and children, locking himself in his children’s’ bedroom. Within days, eight of his coworkers, his wife, her parents and her sister all tested positive for the virus. 

“It’s not a cold. It’s not the flu. It’s something completely different,” said Alvarado. “We take so many precautions [now] because we don’t want anyone to experience this.”  

Alvarado believes he became infected on Aug. 31, when a trusted client visited his office at a construction company where masks are mandated. The client entered the building without a mask, making Alvarado the first of his co-workers to contract the virus which they all took home to their families. 

Before being diagnosed Sept. 7, Alvarado’s attempt to protect his family through self isolation failed, resulting in his wife experiencing even more severe symptoms than him. A 10-day fever, stomach complications, intense migraines and dehydration eventually caused her to faint twice, sending her to the hospital for treatment. 

Now that he and his family have recovered from the virus, excluding some short-term mental health challenges and insomnia experienced by his wife and boss, Alvarado said taking proper precautions to protect everyone around him has become vital. 

Alvarado’s story, shared during a virtual media briefing Thursday, is one of thousands, said San Mateo County Deputy Health Officer Dr. Curtis Chan. As the county nears 13,000 infections, predominantly among communities of color, health experts and county officials gathered virtually to highlight the COVID-19 disparities experienced by underserved communities and how officials have worked to mitigate concerns. 

To date, 6,505 Latino residents have tested positive for the highly infectious respiratory disease with an additional 1,276 Asian residents testing positive, accounting for well over half of all 12,878 infections in the county. Dr. Kenneth Tai, the chief medical officer at North East Medical Services who spoke during the event, noted an internal study revealed those who speak Spanish or Vietnamese are four times as likely to test positive for the virus compared to other language groups.    

And while people of color are most likely to catch the virus, frequently attributed to providing essential work, Deputy County Manager Justin Mates noted early testing efforts exposed access disparities as well. With one static testing site stationed at the San Mateo County Event Center meant to serve nearly 800,000 residents, many communities faced physical barriers in efficiently getting to and from the site. 

“One of the big priorities for us has been trying to lower the barriers to access for testing for all of our residents, for all corners of our residents,” said Mates, noting the county has doubled testing rates over the past two months.  

The county now provides multiple testing sites including the stationary site at the event center, a rotating site which pops up in Daly City, North Fair Oaks, Half Moon Bay, San Bruno and East Palo Alto and more targeted neighborhood testing which frequently isn’t listed online. 

Fears of testing positive also served as a barrier, said Mates, because many residents shared concerns for losing income, hours or their job completely. In response, the county launched an assistance program through the Mental Health Association, offering financial, food and housing support to those who test positive for the virus and are contacted through contact tracers.

Chan also implored residents to “trust contact tracers,” noting information gathered is never provided to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. Addressing data privacy concerns when being tested through a state or county funded Verily Inc. site, Mates also said the company is required to notify users of how data is being used and to make data anonymous when sharing to other agencies. 

“We have conversations with [Verily officials] all the time about making sure they are appropriately protecting users’ data,” said Mates. “These are concerns that we’re sensitive to. … The concerns of privacy do have to be balanced against the value that testing vendors like Verily bring to the table.” 

Recognizing the distrust felt by some communities, the county has also partnered with 34 nonprofits from all over the county to inform residents of what resources are available. The same messengers have also been tapped to spread the county’s message about not gathering during the holidays, a major concern as COVID-19 cases surge across the state. 

The county’s new daily case rate has doubled within a week, jumping from 4.1 new cases per 100,000 residents to over 10 with an adjusted case count of 5.7, forcing the county back into the more restrictive red tier within the state’s reopening framework. The surge has mostly been attributed to gatherings among younger community members ages 20 to 49. Health officials have said the trend is true across ethnic divides. 

On Tuesday, Chief of Health Louise Rogers also said it was possible the county could be moved into the most restrictive purple tier and, if it did, new restrictions could be announced by the end of this week or the beginning of next week. Deputy Chief of Health Srija Srinivasan said on Thursday that the margin between the red and purple tier for a county the size of San Mateo is thin. 

(650) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Scott McVicker

(Stage lights up.)

The Reader's Digest version...

A man got sick and those around him also got sick. They all recovered (as do 99%+ of all similarly infected). Wild assumptions were made about the origin. Nobody thought to recall that these face muzzles do not block viruses (think bumble bee through a chain link fence).

(Cue pre-recording of the virus narrative. Fade to black.)

John Baker

If 1% of the people in the US died, that would mean about 3.3 million deaths not a small fact.

Here's your pre-recording: Enough with the BS against masks. A virus doesn't float around freely; It lives on small particles of moisture that are coughed or sneezed out and are indeed wide enough for masks to block. My mask doesn't protect ME, it protects YOU, and when you don't where one, you're putting ME at risk.

Terence Y

Mr. Baker – maybe you could provide a response to the recent ACP DANMASK-19 study, among others, indicating face masks do not work and are potentially dangerous. Or provide particle sizes for COVID vs. the particle size that N95 masks will stop. Or the particle size that ubiquitous disposable filter masks will stop. If COVID is smaller, then are masks really effective? Mr. McVicker has provided an analogy that COVID is much smaller than mask pore size. Or are masks just a placebo? I’m not against wearing masks – if somebody wants to wear a mask, they should do so. The placebo effect has been shown to be beneficial for some people.

Scott McVicker

Let's look at the total number of U.S. deaths based on an 8.8/1000 death rate. Total population is 328.2M. Annual deaths = 2.88M. Now google COVID deaths in the U.S. = 250,000 (N.Y. Times)...not discerning between people who tested positive and those who, it is assumed, died exclusively FROM the virus.

So, 250K people COVID, 2.63M from everything else. Ratio 250K/328.2M. The result = 0.076%. Nowhere near 1%. Thank you for playing.

RE: Masks. A simple way to view this is by assuming nobody wears masks. How does a virus enter your body? Did YOU have to inhale it? Yes. So, if you were trying to protect yourself, you would erect a barrier to inhaling it. Would you choose a mask that states – right on the packaging – that they filter out viruses? Review this (the photo at 1:26): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D91nK6R3ZSs

Bad luck if this is the type you are wearing.

As to the ME versus YOU position, the virus narrative has been crafted to create social pressure which leads to conformity/obedience. So the simple explanation above is turned completely around...and somehow, others (the public) are responsible for YOUR safety. See how your description blames ME if you get the virus? See how this narrative pushes the concept of vaccination? They wish to inoculate OTHERS for YOUR safety.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!