Though the San Mateo Union High School District’s fiscal outlook is relatively healthy over the immediate term, the projected threat of a economic downturn is a source of some concern for those managing the school system’s budget.

The district Board of Trustees discussed the budget during a workshop Thursday, May 16, when officials examined a spending plan showing expenditures outpacing income.

While the trend raises red flags, Liz McManus, district deputy superintendent for Business Services, noted a hearty reserve fund will help stave off any potential economic emergency while officials look to identify more efficient spending patterns.

“We have to be a little more fiscally prudent moving forward, that is where the district is,” said McManus.

The high school district is funded primarily by local property taxes which generated an expected $172.6 million, according a district budget report showing spending is expected to reach $175.1 million. A healthy reserve fund with $21 million will need to be drawn down to balance the books, according to the report.

McManus said the district’s spending imbalance is made worse by the lack of state funding available under Gov. Gavin Newsom, who appears less willing to allocate one-time money to school systems than his predecessor, former governor Jerry Brown.

Though the structural deficit exists, school board President Greg Land said officials will not be deterred from spending on programs which they believe can pay great dividends in advancing student achievement.

To that end, he noted the district maintains a $360,000 budget line item dedicated to financing innovation opportunities as an example of officials’ financial commitment to offering students cutting-edge programs.

But he balanced his overall perspective by suggesting a closer examination of existing programs for efficacy is in order to assure the district is getting the most bang for its buck.

“I think it is just being measured in what we want to try,” he said.

The need for fiscal conservatism is fueled to some degree by the threat of an economic slowdown, which could push down the historic amounts of property taxes received in recent years, said Land.

“The economy can turn and that can change things really quickly for school budgets,” he said.

McManus shared a similar perspective.

“You have to be prepared to move if there are changes for how you ride any kind of economic downturn out,” she said.

As officials examine programs to assure the investments are justified, McManus said the hearty reserve fund allows officials to pace themselves and likely avoid any rash decisions.

“We have adequate time to look at things and dig down and look at what we can do,” she said.

Looking ahead, McManus said officials also need to remain wary of the financial burden placed on the district by increased retirement and pension benefits for former employees.

“It’s going to impact school districts more and more as the numbers continue to increase,” she said.

Yet despite the future economic hazards, McManus said officials are disinterested in seeking support from voters for a tax measure which would help balance the budget. She suggested the district is not considering programmatic cuts either. Such efforts can be avoided due to the thoughtful budget development process favored by officials, she said.

“The board is always very fiscally responsible and wants to do the right thing by students and employees,” she said.

Land too said officials will steer clear of ballot measures or cost cuts to balance the budget, noting the district’s financial footing remains much more stable than many other surrounding school systems.

“I don’t think we are in the same positions as other districts,” he said. “I think we are in a much better position.”

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Christopher Conway

How much of the current debt is due to paying retired teachers and administrators benefits. Current money paying off old debt for work already done. This is the face of public education today, get used to it as it will only be getting worse.

BurlingameRocks

And how about the from the stats: California Spends $17.4 Billion Educating Illegals & Anchor Babies
According to the state budget, California spends $88.3 billion on primary education. Given the proportion of illegal aliens and anchor babies relative to the broader student body, we can conclude that illegal aliens and their children consume $17.4 billion in additional educational costs.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!