A miscalculation of what a $20 billion regional housing bond could generate annually triggered the threat of legal action against the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority Aug. 2.
Regional Measure 4 is meant to bridge the financing gap that many developers face when trying to secure funding for housing, especially for below-market-rate units, and would be funded by property owners across all nine Bay Area counties. In June, BAHFA officially voted to add the measure to the November ballot, but it didn’t take long to receive notice that its estimates were incorrect.
The original ballot measure question asked voters whether to adopt the $20 billion bond measure, which would generate $670 million each year while bonds are outstanding. But the updated amount, approved during a recent BAHFA meeting Thursday, Aug. 8, would increase that figure from $670 million to about $911 million. According to the resolution, “a correction to the ballot question to delete ‘$670,000,000’ from the ballot question and replace it with ‘$910,976,423’ was approved unanimously.”
The bond would be funded by levying about $19 per $100,000 of assessed property and is estimated to provide about 70,000 affordable housing units across the region. San Mateo County would receive about $2 billion, with a minimum of 52% allocated for affordable housing production and 15% for preservation, per the Regional Housing Finance Act. However, BAHFA and the Association of Bay Area Governments can update those percentages with a two-third majority vote no earlier than five years after its passage. The funds could be allocated toward below-market-rate housing production for those earning up to 120% of the area’s median income, which, as of 2023, was about $210,000 for a four-person household in San Mateo County.
Interesting, an agency that cannot do simple math wants taxpayers to take out a loan for $20,000,000,000 (billion dollars) that will cost us $48 billion to pay off over the next 53 years. It's a no brainer, Vote NO on RM4.
Great advice, tarzantom. I will vote NO on RM4 and any other measure looking to take away more money from my pocket. Let’s also note that if these folks can’t figure out the amount generated, I’d posit that this estimated $48 billion payback is likely on the lower side, especially with our current economic conditions.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Interesting, an agency that cannot do simple math wants taxpayers to take out a loan for $20,000,000,000 (billion dollars) that will cost us $48 billion to pay off over the next 53 years. It's a no brainer, Vote NO on RM4.
Great advice, tarzantom. I will vote NO on RM4 and any other measure looking to take away more money from my pocket. Let’s also note that if these folks can’t figure out the amount generated, I’d posit that this estimated $48 billion payback is likely on the lower side, especially with our current economic conditions.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.