Editor,
I’m voting for Amourence Lee for City Council for a simple reason: She has a vision for an affordable, inclusive future for all San Mateans.
Editor,
I’m voting for Amourence Lee for City Council for a simple reason: She has a vision for an affordable, inclusive future for all San Mateans.
Plus, she puts in the work — overtime — nearly every day. Not only does Lee show up and do her homework for City Council meetings, she’s spent a ton of extra time during the pandemic sharing valuable information with residents about crucial resources: COVID-19 testing, how to get help with the rent, how to get grants and business loans, and even which restaurants are open downtown (she even made a map showing dining options).
Also, Lee’s campaign is funded almost entirely by locals. This is not true of all candidates. A discussion on Nextdoor revealed that Lisa Diaz Nash has benefited from well over $100,000 in contributions from the California Apartment Association, a Sacramento-based PAC for landlords. (You can check campaign donation sources here: https://www.southtechhosting.com/SanMateoCity/CampaignDocsWebRetrieval/).
There’s also a personal reason I’m voting for Amo Lee. For 23 years, I’ve lived in San Mateo’s North Central neighborhood, one of the most diverse, and economically most challenged, on the Peninsula — thanks to past years of redlining. During that time, I’ve noticed that the City Council and various city departments tend to overlook North Central. I am glad we have a North Central voice on the council, representing the diversity and the resilience of this beautiful community.
Dylan Tweney
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(15) comments
Past 20 years of redlining? Got any evidence of that? I think you are telling a pretty big fib there Dylan. Most people do not know that Amourence Lee was appointed as a council member and not elected. She is responsible for bringing a political agenda into our city hall that aligns with Black Lives Matter, the uber left who pound racial equity and social justice and are behind defund the police. If you want more parades down El Camino with malcontents outside our city, dressed in black and hiding their faces, Ms. Lee is for you. Amourence Lee does not represent the people of San Mateo, she is supported by left wing activists who want to bring fundamental change to our city and whose organizations hate America and our collective history.
CC--if Lee was appointed, then your real gripe should be with the current council who appointed her.
It is, but the council now doesn't listen to the people of San Mateo. Just look at their opposition to Y and then putting R on the ballot. It is time for the people of San Mateo to pay attention and replace those on the council with people who actually like ALL of us.
I didn't say redlining was in the past 20 years, but it's a well established fact that redlining was a practice on the SF Peninsula up to the early 1970s. San Mateo's North Central neighborhood was one of the few places where African Americans could buy houses. That's why it's more diverse today than other parts of the city, and I suspect it's why the neighborhood is consistently neglected by City Hall, Parks & Rec, and other departments. I for one am glad to have this overlooked neighborhood represented on City Council by a careful, hardworking, thoughtful leader.
Think North Central is ignored by the San Mateo City Council? Shoreview and Parkside are the most obviously neglected neighborhoods in San Mateo.
Wow. That sure doesn't describe the Amourence Lee that I know and that our county sheriff endorsed. And.... a great book that examines how our government segregated America, read Richard Rothstein's The Color of Law. Eye-opening!
Dylan
I guess it depends on which form 460 you look at if you look at 7/27 for Ms. Lee there are numerous donations from PA and So Cal. You claim entirely local, so another incorrect statement. Have a wonderful day.
You're misstating what I wrote, which is easy to check above. I said "almost entirely" funded by locals. Here are the facts: 49% of Amo's donor's live in the City of San Mateo and 71% live within San Mateo County. Compare that to Nash where only 27% of her donors live in the City of San Mateo and only 31% even live in the County of San Mateo.
29% is still a big number, and everyone's threshold will be different. For me that would need to be 90-95% to qualify for an almost entirely. Also no way to know how and what you are considering in your calculations.
Mr. Tweney. Regarding "I’m voting for Amourence Lee for City Council for a simple reason: She has a vision for an affordable, inclusive future for all San Mateans".....
I encourage you and others to really think/research about how you are voting and the outcome you are hoping to achieve. "The cure might be worse than the disease." Chris' comments should be heeded. This is a very serious matter.
The most important election in history. Many uneducated positions or people being voted for will not be able to be undone.
Recommended reading and education of the blueprint for what's happening now........read "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky.......the blueprint to overturn and take over America. More socialism, communism, BLM and antifa involvement and attacks.
I can appreciate you desire to be heard and issues solved. However, bringing in Ms. Lee's espoused ideas and remedies will only make things worse for all of us in the long run. Sugar coated solutions, snaring people in. Do not vote her in.
Funny...... Young conservatives flocked to Rules for Radicals as the go-to-guide for working against President Obama's agenda, and in many ways, their tactics worked. The "Tea Party" was guided by Alinsky's rules, and yes, they too were quite effective in getting their agenda enacted. So yes, Lou, I agree with your recommendation to read the book. Part of the back cover says "Like Thomas Paine before him, Alinsky was able to combine, both in his person and his writing, the intensity of political engagement with an absolute insistence on rational political discourse and adherence to the American democratic tradition."
The Tea Party did not use the Rules to Radicals guideline to protest Obama. Come on Craig, you are better than that. You seem to be a fan of Alinsky when he was one the greatest enemy this country has ever had.
When we first opened our shop in San Mateo, one of the first visitors was a member of the City Council and he brought us a pie. In the 11 years since we've gotten to know many members of the council, hard working decent people who want to make a difference in their community. Amourence Lee continues that tradition. When a disabled person told me she was about to be evicted, in the middle of this pandemic, one email to Amo was all it took to get that woman some help. When I reached out to the city to ask if they would, for the first time, raise the Rainbow Flag to celebrate LGBTQ+ Pride month, Amo was on board and helped make it happen. The current and former Mayor were on hand for that special day. The next day they and I were back to peacefully march with hundreds of San Mateo neighbors seeking justice for people of color in the wake of yet another tragic killing of a black man.
San Mateo is fortunate to have good candidates running in this race, people who want to serve our city, pretty selflessly given the benefits! Go to their web sites, look at who endorses them, look at their stated positions (not the made up shrieks of fear posted by some), look at their histories, and yes, look at where campaign funds come from. Then make up your mind. I support Amo Lee because I know her, like her, believe in her, and people I know, trust, and respect have endorsed her, including our county sheriff (the top cop in the county supports Amo).
When the Sherriff and the head to the POA endorse a proponent of Defund the Police you lose respect for the Sherriff and the leader of the POA. You know something stinks in Denmark when that is the case. You then start to realize the Sherriff and the head of the POA are political animals more than they care about the safety and security of the those people they are paid to protect. I am glad you have respect for our Sherriff Bolanos who was caught with then Sherriff Munks looking for the services in a house of ill repute. Having this Sherriff endorse Ms. Lee is everything you need to know about this election and why you need to not vote for her.
'Sheriff' has only one 'r' ...
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.