Editor,
Most media have given ample space to a certain demographic that keeps on hammering on racism and white privilege. It is time that these same media allow for a different perspective of this complicated but mostly biased reporting.
Editor,
Most media have given ample space to a certain demographic that keeps on hammering on racism and white privilege. It is time that these same media allow for a different perspective of this complicated but mostly biased reporting.
In the last week, the DJ had two opinion pieces by representatives of the NAACP who both perpetuated stories out of context about the deplorable perils that Black folks face. Without asking, they also dragged in the non-monolithic brown demographic, possibly to fortify more sympathy for their subjective points.
There are many Black politicians and educators who do not subscribe to the worn out mantra of the NAACP. Why would these same NAACP leaders support school systems and major city administrations that are run by selected minority demographics that continue to hamper the progress of the constituents that they pretend to represent?
Please note that neither author offered any solutions other than blaming everyone else for the disastrous systems that their agenda itself foisted upon the referenced population. The vast majority of black on black murders occur in cities run by Black politicians. School districts in our large cities are mostly run by Black administrators. Yet, Black students, according to the Department of Education, are consistently scoring well below the acceptable norm in terms of reading and math skills. These authors lack introspection. Yes, much needs and can be done but we all need to start with being honest about root causes. That is an inconvenient truth.
Dirk van Ulden
Belmont
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
Agreed, Mr. van Ulden. We seem to be subjected to more lecturing than action from these NAACP representatives. Just today, we have yet another letter supporting these “representatives.” As usual, there are no solutions, just the usual gibberish about “systemic change.” I do note that in these three letters, no mention of the death and destruction wrought by BLM in our streets. As for police reform, maybe the Bay Area can be like Seattle, where almost 250 police officers have left their jobs as of last year. I wonder if people with so called “white privilege” are actually doing more for blacks than the NAACP.
The NAACP thinks that they have us on a roll but I believe the tide is turning. Especially galling is to see the ambulance chasers, who are now zilionaires, with crocodile tears crying all the way to the bank. They are just milking the system and are not doing squat to help the communities from whence the victim came.
It seems the NAACP would rather have an issue than solving the problem.
Hello, Dirk
Thanks for submitting an insightful letter in reaction to the guest perspective pieces focused on police and the use of lethal force associated with Blacks being killed.
Most Americans (about 75%) support voter IDs. Yet, the Biden administration suggests you are racist if you do.
Most Americans (over 80%) support a secure border, Yet, the Biden administration suggests you are racist if you do.
And I believe most Americans agree with Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) when he says, "America is not a racist country." So, coming full circle... I'm sure most Americans agree that there must be accountability whenever a police officer uses his or her service weapon in the line of duty. Is there anyone who thinks otherwise?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.