Editor,
Having had a long career in special, academic and public libraries in three states, I know how critical library services are to the preservation of democracy, and how integrally interconnected they are to school services.
Editor,
Having had a long career in special, academic and public libraries in three states, I know how critical library services are to the preservation of democracy, and how integrally interconnected they are to school services.
At this particular time in America’s history, ensuring the continuing integrity of our democracy is especially important. To reduce either of these services in any way is a travesty, threatens the intellectual infrastructure of our nation and seems totally in sync with the regressive changes coming from Washington, D.C.
At the very least, libraries might be challenged to hold the line, retaining the current year’s budget. Those of us in library management during the ’80s, ’90s and early 2000s had ample opportunity to master the art of “making do” with what we had. It meant learning how to work smarter, and to shuffle allocated funds about to support critical programs and services. Every organization can trim the fat, and it seems to me that the Redwood Council should try to involve all city departmental management in a discussion of, and trouble-shooting process for, solving this budgetary problem (“City weighs budget cuts,” in the Feb. 28 edition of the Daily Journal).
That said, to anyone familiar with Redwood City’s bucolic past, the rapid pace of development and mass construction that has been going on suggests that tax revenues should have been escalating sufficiently to keep pace with budgetary requirements.
What is wrong with this picture?
Trish Taylor
Redwood City
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Agree with you on the importance of libraries Trish. Big supporter. The reason this picture doesn't make sense to you is that the increase in revenues and the strong local economy should provide the ability to spend more, certainly not make cuts. However, as budgets are saddled with a higher and higher amounts needed to fund previous obligations such as pensions and healthcare for retirees. It is crowding out things that the community desires including libraries. To make the story even worse, this is happening when revenues are strong and the economy is pumping. What happens when the economy slows and revenues drop? the obligations to public employees will only be going up and up, making money for other budgetary items shrink or get the axe altogether. Local, state and federal government budgets are going to be eaten up by public employees who have retired and leaving less money for everything else. You are not alone in RWC, it is happening everywhere and unfortunately, this dynamic has only just begun, it is only going to get much worse.
Christopher: Pleased to read that at least one person out there has done their homework and understands the financial dynamics in play. Kudos to you for doing so.
I find these proposed services cuts extremely distressing!
For the last 10 years I have watched the city landscape be transformed by the use of eminent domain to add tens of thousands of housing units. The population of Redwood City has been on a steady increase. With the increase in population, we long-term residents have seen the increase in traffic congestion, limited parking and cutbacks in water availability, in a general decline in quality of life.
What we have not seen use any new land resources being created for Parks and Recreation (not counting the noisiest dog park in the world). As the city leaders continue to make available every foot of available land in the city limits to developers, one would think that this would lead to a better community for us. Yet here we are looking at cutbacks in our basic services! I believe it is time to challenge city leadership on their development centric approach to changing the landscape of Redwood City.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.